Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
The pro-touchdown arguments presuppose that Jennings a) had possession as he crossed the plane and b) maintained it. If he did not have possession of the ball (e.g., if it was moving in his hands), then getting his feet down in the end zone doesn't constitute a touchdown. Furthermore, the entire argument regarding Jennings' breaking of the plan is rendered moot by the fact that official ruled that he was in the act of falling, and from the screen shots that have been posted, it appears that was the correct call. Therefore, by rule, he must maintain possession all the way to the ground, even if he fell out of bounds. The ground may not be able to cause a fumble, but it sure can cause an incomplete pass.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago



Also why IMO it is to close to overturn. Only if the Ref hadn't made that stupid going to the ground comment.

"IronMan" wrote:


Why is it stupid? He was going to the ground. That is the rule.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Because the ball was out before he was going to the ground so that nullifies the rule even applying.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
In that case, shouldn't the correct call been a fumble out of the end zone, the result being that the Bears received possession on the Packers' 20-yard line?
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago

In that case, shouldn't the correct call been a fumble out of the end zone, the result being that the Bears received possession on the Packers' 20-yard line?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Nope. By what I have pointed out, the ball was moving when the right foot first touched. As he moved the ball into his body, gaining possession his left foot made contact (1st foot). before his right foot touched again, the defender knocked the ball lose. So he never had possession for it to be a fumble.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
So the correct call in your opinion was incomplete pass. I can buy that.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago
So if a player has possession of the ball, takes 2 steps, then goes down and loses the ball its an incomplete pass?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

So if a player has possession of the ball, takes 2 steps, then goes down and loses the ball its an incomplete pass?

"cheeseheads123" wrote:

Depends on the referee. I did some research and its inconsistent.

Some days, it would be a TD.
Some days, it won't be a catch at all.


We could debate it til we're blue in the face, bottom line, the rule is not upheld consistently.
UserPostedImage
TheEngineer
15 years ago

In that case, shouldn't the correct call been a fumble out of the end zone, the result being that the Bears received possession on the Packers' 20-yard line?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



I don't think it's possible to have a TD catch fumbled out of bounds in the endzone if the player crosses the plane, or has made the reception in the endzone. In either scenario, possession is established first before a fumble must occur; if possession is established within the endzone a TD must result as the play is dead immediately.

I also do not believe Jennings bobbled it - he caught it at a weird angle, then shifts it to a more natural position. At no point does the ball bounce around in his hand.
blank
mi_keys
15 years ago
The way I remember it, and I really want to go back and watch a replay of it, was that Jennings caught it and took two steps before being stripped on the third and fumbling. In which case it is a catch and a touchdown. It would have been a fumble if it had been anywhere outside the end zone in the field of play (by the way, for those of you asking if it was a fumble, I hope you're making a joke).

The thing everyone is getting caught up on is that everyone is saying two feet down equals a touchdown. No it doesn't. You don't have to get two feet down, you have to make a football move, which taking two STEPS is (I believe I've even seen one step considered a football move). If anyone is watching the Arizona-San Fran game right now, you'll recall that the second Arizona fumble was a catch and fumble because he was stripped as he took his second strip by Willis (beautiful play btw).

The issue with going to ground is if you catch it and you are being tackled as you catch it as was the case with that Oakland receiver. That situation is nothing like Jennings as we've pointed out that Jennings was actually still running. For the argument that the defender touched Jennings shortly after catching it and therefore meaning he was going down I ask this: if a receiver catches a pass and as soon as he does a defender jumps on his back, he then runs with the ball for 20 steps and falls to the ground, losing the ball when he lands, is that incomplete? Clearly that would not be the case because he was not going down in spite of the contact and he made a football move after the catch.

That said, if Jennings bobbled it the entire time leading up to the strip (which I don't believe he did, but again I want to see the replay) then it would be incomplete. If not, it should have been ruled a touchdown.
Born and bred a cheesehead
TheEngineer
15 years ago
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2009121302/2009/REG14/packers@bears#tab:watch 

and watch the video entitled: NFL Scoreboard: Packers-Bears highlights.

At the 25 second mark.
blank
Fan Shout
beast (11h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (11h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (21h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (21h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (23h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.