Greg Jennings' Non-TD· Page 7

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

but maintaining is only pertinent if the player is falling, which I don't believe Jennings was.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

The one thing noone has brought up was Jennings reaction he didn't argue to much over the call. So i think he figured he dropped the ball thus incomplete.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

cheeseheads123
Member

15 years ago

#62

but maintaining is only pertinent if the player is falling, which I don't believe Jennings was.

"dhazer" wrote:

The one thing noone has brought up was Jennings reaction he didn't argue to much over the call. So i think he figured he dropped the ball thus incomplete.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

He has been complaining a lot lately i think it was just time that he realized he needs to stop lol.

bozz_2006
Registered

15 years ago

#63

agreed. if he would've held onto the ball like he should have it would have been a TD and a non-issue.

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#64

but maintaining is only pertinent if the player is falling, which I don't believe Jennings was.

"dhazer" wrote:

The one thing noone has brought up was Jennings reaction he didn't argue to much over the call. So i think he figured he dropped the ball thus incomplete.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

He immediately waved at the sideline and then hobbled over there. I think he was more concerned about his knee. Based on his reaction on the sideline, I don't believe he even knew they were ruling it an incomplete pass until he was over there.

IronMan
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#65

If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play, or in the end zone.

[youtube]z7QwZCIwMyc[/youtube]

This is really simple. I am dumbfounded why so many don't get it.

LambeauEast
Rookie

15 years ago

#66

I said it in the chat live, after botched replay, and I'll say it now...it was a touchdown!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#67

but maintaining is only pertinent if the player is falling, which I don't believe Jennings was.

"dhazer" wrote:

The one thing noone has brought up was Jennings reaction he didn't argue to much over the call. So i think he figured he dropped the ball thus incomplete.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

I notice that too, but I thought he didn't complain because he 'knew' it would be reviewed and found out as a touchdown. His comments after the game support that too.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#68

I think it was a non-catch. The Ref messed up with the replay announcement, but I don't think he got it. Watching the replay, the left foot is the first for possession, and as the 2nd foot is coming down, the defender knocked the ball lose. I think they got it right on the field. Close though.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#69

"IronMan" wrote:

This is really simple. I am dumbfounded why so many don't get it.

I'm dumbfounded on how anyone can think that play posted is close to the Jennings 'non' TD. I remembered it like this ... Jennings, one foot, two foot, around the time the third foot (he has THREE FEET!) touches down, the defender slaps the ball out while out of bounds and drags him down.

I could be wrong and as implied by IronMan, just dumb and can't simply 'get it', but that's how I remember it. And from reading the rules, looks like it should have been a touchdown.

IronMan
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#70

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

This is really simple. I am dumbfounded why so many don't get it.

"IronMan" wrote:

Yep, thats what happened. And thats an incomplete pass.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (now) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (11m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (22m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (32m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (52m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (19h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS