umair_010
a year ago

Seriously? What does this even mean?

I lay out potential options I see other trams utilize and this is the garbage stated in response? Do we talk ball here anymore or just a cesspool of attempts to one up someone for a pathetic giggle?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




I already stated what I think the problem is. The coaching staff needs to get wiped out. They made zero adjustments In this losing streak. It's pretty clear now that our former qb was carrying a lot of the weight. Well now that he's gone it's starting to show. We can't even evaluate Love because absolutely everything around him is hogwash.
umair_010
a year ago

I already stated what I think the problem is. The coaching staff needs to get wiped out. They made zero adjustments In this losing streak. It's pretty clear now that our former qb was carrying a lot of the weight. Well now that he's gone it's starting to show. We can't even evaluate Love because absolutely everything around him is hogwash.

Originally Posted by: umair_010 



It's the same mistakes week in and week out. Time to clean house. Even if we get top draft picks it won't make an ounce of difference. You need good people running the show.
beast
a year ago

I am sure Beast will correct me here, but our offense, like SF, is based on a (wide) zone blocking scheme. Everything is set up off this scheme....play action, screens, and pass blocking.

You can't simply change schemes mid season, you need to get players who can effectively play within your system.

Clearly, we do not have the OLine that can excel or succeed in the system.

Moreover, we cannot pick up a 3rd & 1 or 4th and 1 to save our souls because we just don't have any road grader Olinemen.

This is on Gutey and the player personnel team.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


Well since you mentioned me... I would say mostly correct, but not everything is based on scheme, as all teams also run a little bit of everything. Just maybe a lot more of certain types of things.

I think the harder part of adding players is learning the different terminology, and chemistry a d things to that effect, though every player is different, such as supposedly QB Chad Pennington went to the Dolphins and learned the entire playbook in less than a week. But most can't do that.

But absolutely yes, the wide zone scheme.e generally takes pressure off of the QB... but pressure doesn't just go away, it's just shared with more players, usually the RB and OL.

That being said, I'm not sure this OL can do well in any scheme, just not talented enough.

Our guards have been hurt since the Detroit game.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


I think they were injured before the Lions game, and Runyan MIGHT be healthy again, or at least he played one game back at his normal level.

The more I hear the more it seems scheme is miminal. It's like defense 3-4 base but teams rarely use base relatively to sub packages. Offenses aren't much different. And clearly what they're doing isn't working so why not try something different? I'm not being insane here by saying out our LG coming off ACL to RT. I'm not saying out a stud permiter CB inside. Im saying instead of whatever blocking scheme they've trotted out there, maybe try a scheme where you just get in the defenders way rather than just watch the guy walk around ya.

I'm just asking for some effort rather than the same ramble ramble every week with the same failures over and over again. If you got a headache, stop hitting your head against the wall.

I'm not saying go from West Coast offense to Run n Gun from top to bottom. I'm saying find something SIMPLE that the guys can execute and build off it.

Something. Anything. Teams change/modify schemes all the time. Hell, 2010 Packers defense did half way through the season!! It can be done. It has been done.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Yes, I believe LaFleaur wants to run a TE/FB system like Shanahan, but he's never had the TE/FB to do it and therefore has gone with more 3 WRs.

Meaning that just because they want the scheme one way, they still run lots of other stuff (going to your sub packages point).


Also to your point, has anyone been seeing some simple slant patterns? If you run it right, guys should be able to occasionally pick up extremely easy 5 yards, either to get a first down OR turn 1st and 10 into 2nd and 5.
UserPostedImage
Martha Careful
a year ago

...That being said, I'm not sure this OL can do well in any scheme, just not talented enough.
...
Yes, I believe MLF wants to run a TE/FB system like Shanahan, but he's never had the TE/FB to do it and therefore has gone with more 3 WRs.

Originally Posted by: beast 

1. Agreed....this line has been overrated for years. And people thought we could get a #2 or #3 for Nijman?!?! We couldn't get a bad of dirty jocks for him!!

I think we might be experiencing a bit of the Peter Principle with Stenovich. He was a very good OL coach. OC, not so much.

2 We drafted the wrong Tight Ends. Musgrave blocking stinks and Kraft rarely sees the field so he must stink in practice. The DeGuara experiment seems to be over(and where is Van Ness btw) We should have drafted Mayer from ND



Go Packers!!!!
beast
a year ago

1. Agreed....this line has been overrated for years. And people thought we could get a #2 or #3 for Nijman?!?! We couldn't get a bad of dirty jocks for him!!

I think we might be experiencing a bit of the Peter Principle with Stenovich. He was a very good OL coach. OC, not so much.

2 We drafted the wrong Tight Ends. Musgrave blocking stinks and Kraft rarely sees the field so he must stink in practice. The DeGuara experiment seems to be over(and where is Van Ness btw) We should have drafted Mayer from ND

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


And there have been more successful OL picked after our OL picks.

TEs usually take at least 3 years to develop, and TEs are usually receivers in today's NFL. I know you don't want to accept that, but they're not nessarily looking for blocking as the number one priority.

You should consider Musgrave a WR, or you'll drive yourself crazy.

Kraft is the best blocker and is getting play because of it. He's still bad at it, but he's the best of the group. And they don't teach most TE to block in college, so they have to learn it a couple of years in the pros first.

I fully expect 10 years from now you'll still have a draft crush on Mayer. Though maybe you should start rooting for them to draft TE Bower this next year.

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
a year ago

1. Agreed....this line has been overrated for years. And people thought we could get a #2 or #3 for Nijman?!?! We couldn't get a bad of dirty jocks for him!!

I think we might be experiencing a bit of the Peter Principle with Stenovich. He was a very good OL coach. OC, not so much.

2 We drafted the wrong Tight Ends. Musgrave blocking stinks and Kraft rarely sees the field so he must stink in practice. The DeGuara experiment seems to be over(and where is Van Ness btw) We should have drafted Mayer from ND


Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 


Oline has some leg injuries right now. They will heal a little every week but we can't put new guys out there, because of the cap situation.

We'll get back to where we were, I hope.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Martha Careful
a year ago

I fully expect 10 years from now you'll still have a draft crush on Mayer. Though maybe you should start rooting for them to draft TE Bower this next year.

Originally Posted by: beast 

 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Go Packers!!!!
nerdmann
a year ago
Packers lost Bakhtiari, but there's been some leg injuries, especially after the Detroit game. 63 is just a rookie, thrust into competition. Well, second year guy.

[YOUTUBE]
?si=pJ-hta6usTzFJQFL
[/YOUTUBE]
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
dfosterf
a year ago
They haven't even tried Caleb Jones at right tackle and putting Zach Tom on the inside. Seems worth trying.
nerdmann
a year ago

They haven't even tried Caleb Jones at right tackle and putting Zach Tom on the inside. Seems worth trying.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 


Traded Rasul Douglas.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (2h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (2h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (13h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (18h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (21h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.