dyeah_gb
2 years ago
If there was a team willing to give three firsts for Rodgers during the offseason and Gute decided to extend him instead, he needs to be fired andcwalked out of the building. He probably thought it was the no risk move but that has blown up in his face. Pack could of had the same record right now under Love and I would be okay because the team would have been clearly rebuilding. Instead the team completely sucks and hasnt even started the rebuild. That it is his fault.

This is not a hindsight thing. Look at the posts during the offseason and you will see plenty of us knew it was obvious to take that deal if it was actually offered.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
go.pack.go.
2 years ago
I don’t know if he needs to be fired yet, but he needs to be held accountable for some poor decisions. The most glaring weakness on this team (WR) has been ignored all offseason, and even up to the trade deadline. Sure he picked up Watkins, but it’s obvious that he sucks. Not good enough.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago

If there was a team willing to give three firsts for Rodgers during the offseason and Gute decided to extend him instead, he needs to be fired andcwalked out of the building. He probably thought it was the no risk move but that has blown up in his face. Pack could of had the same record right now under Love and I would be okay because the team would have been clearly rebuilding. Instead the team completely sucks and hasnt even started the rebuild. That it is his fault.

This is not a hindsight thing. Look at the posts during the offseason and you will see plenty of us knew it was obvious to take that deal if it was actually offered.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 



Maybe that's what it is. Because of that deal, they want Aaron to retire. I suppose they could still trade him in the offseason.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
dhazer
2 years ago

I don’t know if he needs to be fired yet, but he needs to be held accountable for some poor decisions. The most glaring weakness on this team (WR) has been ignored all offseason, and even up to the trade deadline. Sure he picked up Watkins, but it’s obvious that he sucks. Not good enough.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



I am so confused are you one of those trolls or what? Last time I checked they drafted 3 wide receivers this offseason. They tried to trade for Darren Waller twice, tried to trade for Juedy and Claypool along with Hockenson. But I guess that is his fault noone would dance with him. Just like it's his fault OBJ chose the Rams over the Packers.

And about the Rodgers trade it came out that Rodgers was the backup plan for the Broncos as they wanted the younger player. So just think we could be worse off and be like Denver in cap hell (as we are) but also gave up a ton of picks to do it lol.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
2 years ago

I am so confused are you one of those trolls or what? Last time I checked they drafted 3 wide receivers this offseason. They tried to trade for Darren Waller twice, tried to trade for Juedy and Claypool along with Hockenson. But I guess that is his fault noone would dance with him. Just like it's his fault OBJ chose the Rams over the Packers.

And about the Rodgers trade it came out that Rodgers was the backup plan for the Broncos as they wanted the younger player. So just think we could be worse off and be like Denver in cap hell (as we are) but also gave up a ton of picks to do it lol.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Drafted 3 receivers, yes. A 2nd rounder (who can’t stay healthy), a 4th rounder, and a 7th rounder. To assume any of these guys would come in and be a #1 receiver is ridiculous. To assume Watkins would be a #1 is even more absurd, and they should’ve known Lazard is not a #1. So they knew going into this year that we had no #1.

Yeah they made some calls, but they didn’t offer enough for any of those guys obviously. Just calling isn’t enough.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago

Drafted 3 receivers, yes. A 2nd rounder (who can’t stay healthy), a 4th rounder, and a 7th rounder. To assume any of these guys would come in and be a #1 receiver is ridiculous. To assume Watkins would be a #1 is even more absurd, and they should’ve known Lazard is not a #1. So they knew going into this year that we had no #1.

Yeah they made some calls, but they didn’t offer enough for any of those guys obviously. Just calling isn’t enough.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



On the other hand, maybe they are done catering to Aaron Rodgers.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
go.pack.go.
2 years ago

On the other hand, maybe they are done catering to Aaron Rodgers.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Why sign him to a big contract and then decide they’re done with him?
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago

Why sign him to a big contract and then decide they’re done with him?

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Because Love wasn't ready, and Aaron was creating drama to extort the team.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
2 years ago
Damn Packers fans are some bitches... three great and amazing seasons and then one bad season and they're crying like babies... just one bad season...


Also, it would be smarter to compare the Russell Wilson trade, than three first picks.


And if anyone needs to be fired, it's the play callers ... Barry absolutely sucks at adjusting and while it's not being talked about, apparently LaFleur and Rodgers can't force themselves to consistently run the ball even though the passing game is clearly rebuilding right now ...


Packers probably would of won some of these games if they didn't forget about the basics like running the ball....

And just this game... Packers failed at a two pointer, failed to kick a FG, and were in FG range at the end of the game but needed a TD because they failed to get those earlier points... play calling along left three kicks (2 FG and 1 PAT) which would be 7 points... and they lost by six, so that's the game...

It really is little things like that adding up that are killing the Packers, which are not Gutes fault, unless you think he should of fired LaFleur after winning 13 games three straight years in a row....


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago

Damn Packers fans are some bitches... three great and amazing seasons and then one bad season and they're crying like babies... just one bad season...


Also, it would be smarter to compare the Russell Wilson trade, than three first picks.


And if anyone needs to be fired, it's the play callers ... Barry absolutely sucks at adjusting and while it's not being talked about, apparently LaFleur and Rodgers can't force themselves to consistently run the ball even though the passing game is clearly rebuilding right now ...


Packers probably would of won some of these games if they didn't forget about the basics like running the ball....

And just this game... Packers failed at a two pointer, failed to kick a FG, and were in FG range at the end of the game but needed a TD because they failed to get those earlier points... play calling along left three kicks (2 FG and 1 PAT) which would be 7 points... and they lost by six, so that's the game...

It really is little things like that adding up that are killing the Packers, which are not Gutes fault, unless you think he should of fired LaFleur after winning 13 games three straight years in a row....

Originally Posted by: beast 


Sick of going for it on 4th down. Thats TWO of these games we lost that we would have won if we had taken the 3 points. Not difficult.

Not sure Aaron wants to win anyway. He looked good throwing the ball today, made it all the way down and then missed the throwing lane so bad he clanked it off a dude's helmet? Really?

Look like old school Aaron, until it's time to score. I'm not buying that. Thete's no way we lost this game legitimately. Way too many opportunities. We had to go out of our way to lose this.

Front office is tanking on Aaron, Aaron is tanking on the team. We need someone with balls like Ted Thompson.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (6h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (12h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.