gbguy20
  • gbguy20
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago



If someone could embed this for me that would be great. It's well worth the watch.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
I would say that this is really an excellent analysis. On a relative basis, it understates the problems of the offensive line, but is well worth the watch.

Thank you GBGUY20 for posting.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
dyeah_gb
6 years ago
That was a good analysis. A couple comments:

I disagree with him on the drag route to Adams. 17 was wide open where the deep pass had tight single coverage.

Does Philbin deserve some of the blame for the erratic offense?

It seems obvious to me that MM is done in GB. His only chance is a miraculous 180 degree change in the way this team plays. Whether the management is capable of finding a good replacement in his absence is TBD.


The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Smokey
6 years ago
GB's Head Coach has become both predictable and not one that uses his personal in the most productive way. Yes the trend is to pass more and run less, but that is not always the best game plan for every team. In fact sometimes less can be more. I'm talking about time of possession as well as the ball security that a running attack provides. A QB like Rodgers would not be the sole key focus of opposing defenses. A more balanced offense makes teams respect both the running and the passing games.

McCarthy's play calls have become too scripted and their opponents have memorized that script. I don't dislike Coach McCarthy, but a change at the end of this season would be welcome. The point is to take advantage of Rodgers talents while he is still GB's starting QB. Winning SBs with Rodgers must be GB's prime goal moving forward and not allowing personal relationships to interfere with that goal.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
6 years ago
Great analysis.

There's one thing I do wonder about, though. When he's talking about the Pack making it hard on themselves and shows those three plays at the goalline... I wonder if that's always Mike's work or just as much Rodgers himself.

It's pretty obvious that on 1st and 2, the O-line is run-blocking, none of the TEs run any kind of routes, but pick up D-linemen and Jones expects the hand-off and stops when he realises the ball is flying to Graham.

In other words, going to Graham on the fade when he's one-on-one is just an option Aaron has at the line, but that did look like a called run play by Mike.

Second down looks like a play-action pass play all the way.

Third down, again, looks like a pretty agressively run-blocking O-line and no pass-route for Jones. Could just be a very good play-action at the wrong time, but I do have the feeling Rodgers could, again, make a choice there.

That doesn't mean I think Mike is either a good or bad coach, but I do think that some of the blame he gets doesn't fully fall on his shoulders.

That said, the bigger point is very clear and the analysis is great. Would be great if they could get back to basics.

The thing that absolutely maddens me is that Mike's shown that he has it in him. The offensive gameplan he drew up for Flynn in that 2010 game against the Patriots, his first start ever, was amazing. We nearly outscored one of the best offenses in the league with our back-up QB.

I recall some good swing routes out of the back, slants, pretty quick curl routes etc. We ran the ball about as much as we threw it, although the talent level at RB was way lower than we have now with Jackson, Kuhn and Nance running it. We used a lot of check-downs to guys like Kuhn, Quinn Johnson, Nance, Quarless and Jackson. Something I've barely seen this year, as guys like Williams, Jones, Kendricks or Lewis are barely involved. I mean, I know Marcedis isn't the prototype pass-catching tight end from an athletic standpoint. Certainly not at his current age. But he is a smart guy who you can get the ball to, who can find some space and pick up 3-7 on a quick hit, rather than taking the sack and throwing away the ball again.
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

Would be great if they could get back to basics.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



Do we want the Packers go to basics or be more creative? I'm confused what fans what. Maybe both?

Maybe back to basics with creative play calling?
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago

Great analysis.

There's one thing I do wonder about, though. When he's talking about the Pack making it hard on themselves and shows those three plays at the goalline... I wonder if that's always Mike's work or just as much Rodgers himself.

It's pretty obvious that on 1st and 2, the O-line is run-blocking, none of the TEs run any kind of routes, but pick up D-linemen and Jones expects the hand-off and stops when he realises the ball is flying to Graham.

In other words, going to Graham on the fade when he's one-on-one is just an option Aaron has at the line, but that did look like a called run play by Mike.

Second down looks like a play-action pass play all the way.

Third down, again, looks like a pretty agressively run-blocking O-line and no pass-route for Jones. Could just be a very good play-action at the wrong time, but I do have the feeling Rodgers could, again, make a choice there.

That doesn't mean I think Mike is either a good or bad coach, but I do think that some of the blame he gets doesn't fully fall on his shoulders.

That said, the bigger point is very clear and the analysis is great. Would be great if they could get back to basics.

The thing that absolutely maddens me is that Mike's shown that he has it in him. The offensive gameplan he drew up for Flynn in that 2010 game against the Patriots, his first start ever, was amazing. We nearly outscored one of the best offenses in the league with our back-up QB.

I recall some good swing routes out of the back, slants, pretty quick curl routes etc. We ran the ball about as much as we threw it, although the talent level at RB was way lower than we have now with Jackson, Kuhn and Nance running it. We used a lot of check-downs to guys like Kuhn, Quinn Johnson, Nance, Quarless and Jackson. Something I've barely seen this year, as guys like Williams, Jones, Kendricks or Lewis are barely involved. I mean, I know Marcedis isn't the prototype pass-catching tight end from an athletic standpoint. Certainly not at his current age. But he is a smart guy who you can get the ball to, who can find some space and pick up 3-7 on a quick hit, rather than taking the sack and throwing away the ball again.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



This is all true, and yet the thing is, even with the offense pl;aying like crap, we STILL "woulda coulda shoulda" won. This team is finding ways to lose, mostly on offense and special teams.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
6 years ago
You know what I would like to see? How about the old Packer sweep! With Jones running the ball.
It seems a lot of the inside runs get stopped. Get Jones outside and into the secondary, and he will run over and through defenders.
Get some plays in the game that throws the defense off guard.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
6 years ago
The Packers could win 50-0 today all we would read about was.
"Well it was only The Dolphins"

I get it.

Many here want Mike gone

Mark Murphy had his chance, he blew it.

This story is so damn old and tiring.

Nothing is going to happen until the end of the year.

Turn it off if you don't want to see it.

Do you have to subject those of us who just want watch and talk Packer football to a constant stream of Mike Sucks he needs to be fired rhetoric?
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Cheesey
6 years ago
I get it, Buckeye.
I don’t know how old you are, but I lived through the 1970s and 80s.
I think many of the young Packer fans are so used to winning, that it is EXPECTED. They don’t understand that it’s not so easy to field a consistently winning team.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : Yeah, and I enjoyed your comments and just attempted to add to it. Sorry if I did it incorrectly.
wpr (6h) : Beast I never said Henderson was the salt of the earth. Nor even that he was correct. Just quoting the guy.
Zero2Cool (8h) : What did you do??
Zero2Cool (8h) : Whoa
beast (8h) : OMG the website is now all white, even some white on white text
beast (9h) : Henderson, who admits to taking cocaine during the Super Bowl against the Steelers, might dislike Bradshaw as he lost two Superbowls to him
wpr (28-May) : Hollywood Henderson said Bradshaw “is so dumb, he couldn't spell 'cat' if you spotted him the C and an A.”
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : Cooper stock=BUY BUY BUY
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : Also notes he’s playing with more confidence.
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : @AndyHermanNFL MLF says there was a time last year where Cooper was at 220 pounds. Now he’s at 240 and still flying around.
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : And don't even get me started on Frank Caliendos "impersonations"
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : I got tired of them being circle jerks with them overlaughing at each others jokes.
Zero2Cool (28-May) : It used to be must watch TV for me. now it's "meh" maybe to hear injury update
Mucky Tundra (28-May) : I haven't watched the pregame shows in years and I don't feel like I've missed a thing
Zero2Cool (28-May) : Love says knee affected him all season, groin injury didn't help matters.
Zero2Cool (28-May) : I used to enjoy him on FOX Pregame. Now it's like a frat party of former Patriots.
Zero2Cool (28-May) : LaFleur on Watson: “Christian is doing outstanding. I would say he’s ahead of schedule.”
Martha Careful (28-May) : Bradshaw is a dumb ass cracker. I am so tired of his "aw shucks" diatribe. He should shrivel up and go away.
buckeyepackfan (28-May) : He wad all butt hurt because Aaron duped the media saying he was immunized.
buckeyepackfan (28-May) : Bradshaw needs to retire. He's been ripping on Rodgers ever since the covid crap. He was all hury
Zero2Cool (28-May) : Terry Bradshaw doesn't want Rodgers in Pittsburgh lol wow
Zero2Cool (27-May) : one day contract, which he also feels is pointless, but if Packers came to him, he would
packerfanoutwest (27-May) : Aaron Rodgers talks possibility of retiring with Packers, just another rumor
dfosterf (27-May) : Go watch 2001
Zero2Cool (26-May) : 1984
dfosterf (26-May) : That movie sent a chill through many. 1968.
dfosterf (26-May) : "Open the pod bay doors, HAL"
buckeyepackfan (25-May) : Haven't we all seen thus movie? It doesn't end well!! Lol
Zero2Cool (25-May) : lol Anthropic’s new AI model turns to blackmail when engineers try to take it offline
dfosterf (25-May) : Claude Opus 4
dfosterf (25-May) : AI system resorts to blackmail when its developers threaten to take it offline
beast (22-May) : Colts Owner Jim Irsay has passed away
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Well, emailing should work now. After not working for almost a year. Oops.
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Brotherly Shove did not get enough votes.
Zero2Cool (20-May) : lol our email hasn't worked in months. 7 pages of unverified users
Zero2Cool (20-May) : MySpace Screaming Lord Byron ... Brett Favre.
Zero2Cool (19-May) : Packers have signed first-round pick Matthew Golden, leaving second-round tackle Anthony Belton as their only unsigned draft pick
beast (19-May) : Supposedly he has to take his image, and name off of it... but otherwise could keep selling wine if he wanted to.
Zero2Cool (19-May) : he giving up his win business?
beast (19-May) : Speaking of Woodson, sounds like he'll be a minority owner (0.1%) of the Browns
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Zero, regarding Woodson, that'd why I find the timing with Williams peculiar
dfosterf (15-May) : Ryan Hall y'all does a great job of tracking thesr
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Fear not!! I planned to do 33mi bike ride tomorrow morning, so ... yeah
Zero2Cool (15-May) : We got some dark clouds and nasty winds right bout now.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Madison they had hail 4pm.
dfosterf (15-May) : Sure looks like these tornadoes are headed towards Green Bay
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Woodson of Charles fame was reluctant and then loved it. that didn't really come out until post career
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : IE "We bought into the Bears and they let us down, we have no choice to seek alternatives"
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Or that Williams and his family are preparing an exit ramp if they don't like how things are going in a few years
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Either Williams thought it would make him look good (reluctant but then embraces the city and franchise)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

27-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-May / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

23-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

22-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

20-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.