gbguy20
  • gbguy20
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
6 years ago



If someone could embed this for me that would be great. It's well worth the watch.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
I would say that this is really an excellent analysis. On a relative basis, it understates the problems of the offensive line, but is well worth the watch.

Thank you GBGUY20 for posting.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
dyeah_gb
6 years ago
That was a good analysis. A couple comments:

I disagree with him on the drag route to Adams. 17 was wide open where the deep pass had tight single coverage.

Does Philbin deserve some of the blame for the erratic offense?

It seems obvious to me that MM is done in GB. His only chance is a miraculous 180 degree change in the way this team plays. Whether the management is capable of finding a good replacement in his absence is TBD.


The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Smokey
6 years ago
GB's Head Coach has become both predictable and not one that uses his personal in the most productive way. Yes the trend is to pass more and run less, but that is not always the best game plan for every team. In fact sometimes less can be more. I'm talking about time of possession as well as the ball security that a running attack provides. A QB like Rodgers would not be the sole key focus of opposing defenses. A more balanced offense makes teams respect both the running and the passing games.

McCarthy's play calls have become too scripted and their opponents have memorized that script. I don't dislike Coach McCarthy, but a change at the end of this season would be welcome. The point is to take advantage of Rodgers talents while he is still GB's starting QB. Winning SBs with Rodgers must be GB's prime goal moving forward and not allowing personal relationships to interfere with that goal.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
6 years ago
Great analysis.

There's one thing I do wonder about, though. When he's talking about the Pack making it hard on themselves and shows those three plays at the goalline... I wonder if that's always Mike's work or just as much Rodgers himself.

It's pretty obvious that on 1st and 2, the O-line is run-blocking, none of the TEs run any kind of routes, but pick up D-linemen and Jones expects the hand-off and stops when he realises the ball is flying to Graham.

In other words, going to Graham on the fade when he's one-on-one is just an option Aaron has at the line, but that did look like a called run play by Mike.

Second down looks like a play-action pass play all the way.

Third down, again, looks like a pretty agressively run-blocking O-line and no pass-route for Jones. Could just be a very good play-action at the wrong time, but I do have the feeling Rodgers could, again, make a choice there.

That doesn't mean I think Mike is either a good or bad coach, but I do think that some of the blame he gets doesn't fully fall on his shoulders.

That said, the bigger point is very clear and the analysis is great. Would be great if they could get back to basics.

The thing that absolutely maddens me is that Mike's shown that he has it in him. The offensive gameplan he drew up for Flynn in that 2010 game against the Patriots, his first start ever, was amazing. We nearly outscored one of the best offenses in the league with our back-up QB.

I recall some good swing routes out of the back, slants, pretty quick curl routes etc. We ran the ball about as much as we threw it, although the talent level at RB was way lower than we have now with Jackson, Kuhn and Nance running it. We used a lot of check-downs to guys like Kuhn, Quinn Johnson, Nance, Quarless and Jackson. Something I've barely seen this year, as guys like Williams, Jones, Kendricks or Lewis are barely involved. I mean, I know Marcedis isn't the prototype pass-catching tight end from an athletic standpoint. Certainly not at his current age. But he is a smart guy who you can get the ball to, who can find some space and pick up 3-7 on a quick hit, rather than taking the sack and throwing away the ball again.
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

Would be great if they could get back to basics.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



Do we want the Packers go to basics or be more creative? I'm confused what fans what. Maybe both?

Maybe back to basics with creative play calling?
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago

Great analysis.

There's one thing I do wonder about, though. When he's talking about the Pack making it hard on themselves and shows those three plays at the goalline... I wonder if that's always Mike's work or just as much Rodgers himself.

It's pretty obvious that on 1st and 2, the O-line is run-blocking, none of the TEs run any kind of routes, but pick up D-linemen and Jones expects the hand-off and stops when he realises the ball is flying to Graham.

In other words, going to Graham on the fade when he's one-on-one is just an option Aaron has at the line, but that did look like a called run play by Mike.

Second down looks like a play-action pass play all the way.

Third down, again, looks like a pretty agressively run-blocking O-line and no pass-route for Jones. Could just be a very good play-action at the wrong time, but I do have the feeling Rodgers could, again, make a choice there.

That doesn't mean I think Mike is either a good or bad coach, but I do think that some of the blame he gets doesn't fully fall on his shoulders.

That said, the bigger point is very clear and the analysis is great. Would be great if they could get back to basics.

The thing that absolutely maddens me is that Mike's shown that he has it in him. The offensive gameplan he drew up for Flynn in that 2010 game against the Patriots, his first start ever, was amazing. We nearly outscored one of the best offenses in the league with our back-up QB.

I recall some good swing routes out of the back, slants, pretty quick curl routes etc. We ran the ball about as much as we threw it, although the talent level at RB was way lower than we have now with Jackson, Kuhn and Nance running it. We used a lot of check-downs to guys like Kuhn, Quinn Johnson, Nance, Quarless and Jackson. Something I've barely seen this year, as guys like Williams, Jones, Kendricks or Lewis are barely involved. I mean, I know Marcedis isn't the prototype pass-catching tight end from an athletic standpoint. Certainly not at his current age. But he is a smart guy who you can get the ball to, who can find some space and pick up 3-7 on a quick hit, rather than taking the sack and throwing away the ball again.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



This is all true, and yet the thing is, even with the offense pl;aying like crap, we STILL "woulda coulda shoulda" won. This team is finding ways to lose, mostly on offense and special teams.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
6 years ago
You know what I would like to see? How about the old Packer sweep! With Jones running the ball.
It seems a lot of the inside runs get stopped. Get Jones outside and into the secondary, and he will run over and through defenders.
Get some plays in the game that throws the defense off guard.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
6 years ago
The Packers could win 50-0 today all we would read about was.
"Well it was only The Dolphins"

I get it.

Many here want Mike gone

Mark Murphy had his chance, he blew it.

This story is so damn old and tiring.

Nothing is going to happen until the end of the year.

Turn it off if you don't want to see it.

Do you have to subject those of us who just want watch and talk Packer football to a constant stream of Mike Sucks he needs to be fired rhetoric?
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Cheesey
6 years ago
I get it, Buckeye.
I don’t know how old you are, but I lived through the 1970s and 80s.
I think many of the young Packer fans are so used to winning, that it is EXPECTED. They don’t understand that it’s not so easy to field a consistently winning team.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / beast

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.