DoddPower
8 years ago

Opium poppy seeds defined as "drugs" by the federal government. Otherwise known as a natural plant.

Heroin...It's natural so it's gotta be okay just like 7water Hemlock, which is also natural. Gets old reading how people who just wanna get high preach how it being natural makes it innocuous. No one was put on this earth to get drunk or high but it's amazing how many spend their short time here chasing just that.

Get help Sam.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I'm OK with any plant being legal. Synthesized drugs can be different, perhaps, but I am still pretty uncertain that the government should be spending it's time on such things. Moreover, pot is not heroin. I can go to a weed shop and buy all I want legally. I don't. Getting high has nothing to do with this. I can also go and get piss drunk wasted legally in many places if I want, but I don't do that either (well, at least very very few places, and only where such behavior is acceptable and expected). Typical weak argument. This is more about one's philosophy on the role of government, priorities, and utilization of limited resources, not about the legality of a plant, or a mushroom. Or even the world's oldest profession.
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Or even the world's oldest profession.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Dude, what does prostitution have to do with smoking weed, bro?
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

I'm OK with any plant being legal. Synthesized drugs can be different, perhaps, but I am still pretty uncertain that the government should be spending it's time on such things. Moreover, pot is not heroin. I can go to a weed shop and buy all I want legally. I don't. Getting high has nothing to do with this. I can also go and get piss drunk wasted legally in many places if I want, but I don't do that either (well, at least very very few places, and only where such behavior is acceptable and expected). Typical weak argument. This is more about one's philosophy on the role of government, priorities, and utilization of limited resources, not about the legality of a plant, or a mushroom. Or even the world's oldest profession.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Ironically, one of my strongest beliefs in life is Big Pharma is truly and literally Satan on this earth. The amount of people we have on legal and synthetic chemicals in this country is beyond crisis levels. Human beings are largely no longer human because their brains have been modified by the drugs they're put on, legally dispensed. Those who dispense these legal synthetic chemicals should be in jail for stealing from people the essence of being human. It's something to cry, fight, rally to change. Our world has lost itself due to things synthesized in some lab. People just don't see it.

However, as much of a homeopath as I am, nobody was put here to be drug controlled natural or unnatural just like u weren't sent here to ingest hemlock.

Deal with life in all it's ugliness instead of escaping through drugs and alcohol. I don't believe NFL players mostly smoke weed for pain. It's done for pleasure.

I think cannabis should have it's pain properties isolated and put in pill form. Ironic, that I'm for this kind of synthesis but... I've always contended that dopers have driven this legalization crusade under the guise of false pretenses. Put the pain relief in a pot pill and tell the dopers they can't get high from smoking. The legalization movement would die if people knew they couldn't smoke to get high. I'd just laugh thinking those dopers cried about how it was good for pain. Great. Here's your pot pain pill. You don't get to smoke it. Those dopers would revolt because it has always been about getting high. I will remain strongly against legalization because it's premise is a lie.

I should have noted that tax revenue is another cry of the dopers. Yup. Put it in an OTC pain pill and you'll get 10x the tax revenue generated, but, again, it's never been about pain management or tax revenue...The liars just wanna get high.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


steveishere
8 years ago

Ironically, one of my strongest beliefs in life is Big Pharma is truly and literally Satan on this earth. The amount of people we have on legal and synthetic chemicals in this country is beyond crisis levels. Human beings are largely no longer human because their brains have been modified by the drugs they're put on, legally dispensed. Those who dispense these legal synthetic chemicals should be in jail for stealing from people the essence of being human. It's something to cry, fight, rally to change. Our world has lost itself due to things synthesized in some lab. People just don't see it.

However, as much of a homeopath as I am, nobody was put here to be drug controlled natural or unnatural just like u weren't sent here to ingest hemlock.

Deal with life in all it's ugliness instead of escaping through drugs and alcohol. I don't believe NFL players mostly smoke weed for pain. It's done for pleasure.

I think cannabis should have it's pain properties isolated and put in pill form. Ironic, that I'm for this kind of synthesis but... I've always contended that dopers have driven this legalization crusade under the guise of false pretenses. Put the pain relief in a pot pill and tell the dopers they can't get high from smoking. The legalization movement would die if people knew they couldn't smoke to get high. I'd just laugh thinking those dopers cried about how it was good for pain. Great. Here's your pot pain pill. You don't get to smoke it. Those dopers would revolt because it has always been about getting high. I will remain strongly against legalization because it's premise is a lie.

I should have noted that tax revenue is another cry of the dopers. Yup. Put it in an OTC pain pill and you'll get 10x the tax revenue generated, but, again, it's never been about pain management or tax revenue...The liars just wanna get high.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Who cares though? Pretty much everything people want is driven by pleasure. People don't put seasoning on their food because they need it but because the taste gives them pleasure. If someone wants to put garlic salt in their fruit loops I don't give a shit even though that sounds disgusting to me. If someone wants to smoke a joint in their house because it makes them happy who cares. I enjoy a glass of bourbon here and there but I don't really feel like it's "helping me deal with the ugliness of life" or anything like that nevertheless I still find it pleasureable, same with beer or wine. It would be pretty annoying if someone tried to stop me from doing that just because they view my reasons differently.
nerdmann
8 years ago
Shields may very well have been a first round pick if he hadn't been busted with weed a week before the draft. That's how we got him as an UDFA.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
8 years ago

WHAT?!? 😕
You think police would turn a blind eye to a bust?
You must be smoking some very strong stuff!

[list=1]Only time I've heard the Police turn a blind eye is (sometimes) when

  • they think it was an honest and simple mistake
  • when the paperwork they'll have to do is worse than the offense
  • no government body is willing to pay for the person to be in jail
  • when that person is fairly politically connected[/list]

    Originally Posted by: beast 


  • Rumor has it he did just receive a suspicious looking package from Colorado...I'm just sayin.
    uffda udfa
    8 years ago

    Who cares though? Pretty much everything people want is driven by pleasure. People don't put seasoning on their food because they need it but because the taste gives them pleasure. If someone wants to put garlic salt in their fruit loops I don't give a shit even though that sounds disgusting to me. If someone wants to smoke a joint in their house because it makes them happy who cares. I enjoy a glass of bourbon here and there but I don't really feel like it's "helping me deal with the ugliness of life" or anything like that nevertheless I still find it pleasureable, same with beer or wine. It would be pretty annoying if someone tried to stop me from doing that just because they view my reasons differently.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    I understand what you're saying but garlic on cereal doesn't impair judgment. Getting high and drunk does. Over 50℅ of crime is committed due to the impact of drugs.

    People enjoy smoking cigs or cigars but that behavior impacts me so it's rightfully banned in public places. Your right for pleasure ends where it infringes on my rights. Having a public high on marijuana is a baffling thing to try and enable.

    People love cocaine, heroin, meth. .. just let them do it because it's pleasurable? No.

    I'm fine with people who want to use alcohol in very moderate amounts. More than that is disgraceful IMO. U R not here to be high or drunk...Murder. Steal. Etc. I don't care who enjoys it.

    Drunks wanna drink...Dopers wanna get high...And kids wanna eat junk food all day.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    uffda udfa
    8 years ago

    Shields may very well have been a first round pick if he hadn't been busted with weed a week before the draft. That's how we got him as an UDFA.

    Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



    Joe Whitt is the one who said Sam could've been a 1st rounder IF he'd been a DB longer at Miami.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    steveishere
    8 years ago

    I understand what you're saying but garlic on cereal doesn't impair judgment. Getting high and drunk does. Over 50℅ of crime is committed due to the impact of drugs.

    People enjoy smoking cigs or cigars but that behavior impacts me so it's rightfully banned in public places. Your right for pleasure ends where it infringes on my rights. Having a public high on marijuana is a baffling thing to try and enable.

    People love cocaine, heroin, meth. .. just let them do it because it's pleasurable? No.

    I'm fine with people who want to use alcohol in very moderate amounts. More than that is disgraceful IMO. U R not here to be high or drunk...Murder. Steal. Etc. I don't care who enjoys it.

    Drunks wanna drink...Dopers wanna get high...And kids wanna eat junk food all day.

    Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



    I'm not sure our laws though have really kept people who want to do those things from doing them. It's mostly just adding another layer of destruction to their lives while adding money and power to nasty cartels and dealers.
    uffda udfa
    8 years ago

    I'm not sure our laws though have really kept people who want to do those things from doing them. It's mostly just adding another layer of destruction to their lives while adding money and power to nasty cartels and dealers.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    You're right. They haven't. This is the kind of argument that grates me to no end.

    People still commit murder although it's not legal. Those who want to murder are going to murder. Based on this logically bereft argument that drugs should be legal because people are still going to do them should we then legalize murder? The fact that we have a morally bankrupt society that wants to go through life high doesn't mean it should be enabled. I don't want to deal with drunk and high people out wandering the streets. We have public intoxication laws to protect from that.

    Personally, I'll never understand what drives a person to want to get drunk or high. Life might suck but deal with it. I never meant to imply having a glass of bourbon meant you weren't. We all know the difference between someone who drinks to get buzzed or drunk vs. someone who just enjoys it. I would argue that if you took the buzz angle away from alcohol close to 100% would stop consuming it. Non alcoholic beverages only sell to recovering alcoholics and those who don't drink. Those who drink are seeking some form of mood alteration and that fits with escaping from life's ugliness.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (10h) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
    dfosterf (11h) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
    dfosterf (11h) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
    dfosterf (11h) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
    dfosterf (11h) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : In your face, HBO!
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : *years
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
    dfosterf (12h) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
    dfosterf (12h) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
    dfosterf (12h) : Maybe a low flying drone
    dfosterf (12h) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
    Mucky Tundra (15h) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
    dfosterf (15h) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Savion concussion ... not good.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    11h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.