wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

hahahaha I still don't buy it. We go 10-6 next year with a promise of a SB win the next season? That wouldn't suck, but it wouldn't be enough to satisfy me either. Take any individual game against anybody, even Seattle - the current flavor of the year; I just can't see the Packers not winning - assuming Aaron Rodgers is playing, and that is with the current crappy D, the marginal O Line, etc. Add some quality in a few key spots to that, and how could we not do a lot better than 10-6?

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



You are confusing a pretend Packer team at some point in the future with unknown players that would probably change every year with the current Packer team. Your comment is immaterial.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
10 years ago
Isn't putting up with a thread like this enough torture?
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

You are confusing a pretend Packer team at some point in the future with unknown players that would probably change every year with the current Packer team. Your comment is immaterial.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Wh-a-a-a-a-t? What are you trying to say? I'm talking about the Packers right now with Aaron Rodgers at QB, Eddie Lacy at RB, our quality group of WRs, Clay Matthews, and not a helluva lot else in terms of quality. Does anybody here actually see us as the underdog against ....... anybody with this bunch? I sure don't.

Fix Safety and improve a couple of other spots, and we have the best team in the league, bar none.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
sschind
  • sschind
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
10 years ago

I f get a "guaranteed SB every 5 years i would be willing to go 0-16 for the 4 years in between.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Actually WPR you hit my intent right on the head. I had originally intended to put a poll question in but I ran short on time. I didn't realize this part of my post was even posted so I didn't fully explain what I was looking for.

Initially my question was going to be If you could guarantee a SB win every 5 years what would you put up with in between?

The poll was going to be something like

4 years of sub 500 record
2 year just missing 2 years sub 500
4 years just missing playoffs (over 500)
4 years 1 and done
none, I'd rather have a team that was very good bet to make the playoffs every year and take my chances on what happens when we do. (Pretty much like we have now but not without improving our chances along the way)

I'm not sure if this would have made any difference in any responses.

Maybe I should have said 2 SB wins in a 10 year period. That would give hope for each season. Of course if we went back to back in the first 2 years the next 8 would suck, maybe even the next 16 before we hit on another BtB.

For a team like the Packers the way they are now, or how they should be providing they make a few upgrades this off season, I think a SB is a distinct possibility. I'd rather have a team that has a decent shot to win it every year. A team that realistically has a chance to beat any team they play (as opposed to an any given Sunday type chance.)

A guaranteed SB win every 5 years with no chance in between might look nice when tallying the championships 25 years from now but like others have said it would be rather boring or at least anticlimactic the years in between.

Its the off season and quite frankly I a little tired of the "which free agents would you like to see signed" along with the obligatory "TT won't sign them anyway so why bother" posts. Winning a Super Bowl or wishing on free agents or draft picks what we think in any case has no bearing on what will happen so in essence they are all just fantasy.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

Actually WPR you hit my intent right on the head. I had originally intended to put a poll question in but I ran short on time. I didn't realize this part of my post was even posted so I didn't fully explain what I was looking for.

Initially my question was going to be If you could guarantee a SB win every 5 years what would you put up with in between?

The poll was going to be something like

4 years of sub 500 record
2 year just missing 2 years sub 500
4 years just missing playoffs (over 500)
4 years 1 and done
none, I'd rather have a team that was very good bet to make the playoffs every year and take my chances on what happens when we do. (Pretty much like we have now but not without improving our chances along the way)

I'm not sure if this would have made any difference in any responses.

Maybe I should have said 2 SB wins in a 10 year period. That would give hope for each season. Of course if we went back to back in the first 2 years the next 8 would suck, maybe even the next 16 before we hit on another BtB.

For a team like the Packers the way they are now, or how they should be providing they make a few upgrades this off season, I think a SB is a distinct possibility. I'd rather have a team that has a decent shot to win it every year. A team that realistically has a chance to beat any team they play (as opposed to an any given Sunday type chance.)

A guaranteed SB win every 5 years with no chance in between might look nice when tallying the championships 25 years from now but like others have said it would be rather boring or at least anticlimactic the years in between.

Its the off season and quite frankly I a little tired of the "which free agents would you like to see signed" along with the obligatory "TT won't sign them anyway so why bother" posts. Winning a Super Bowl or wishing on free agents or draft picks what we think in any case has no bearing on what will happen so in essence they are all just fantasy.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I knew what you meant even if others didn't. just carrying the post until you had a chance to comment.
I doubt your additions would have changed anyone's opinion.
2 SB in back to back years and then 8 years of nothing would still add up the same but I would hate that.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
10 years ago
I Agree there is no guarantee - cough look at denver ...

Team did great and then 'lucky plays' there was no way for a comeback after all those 'mis-cues'

and when we won the SB - the odds were heavily stacked against us (vegas odds) ... IMO the main things that were not; were the fact that we never lost a game by that much and some of our guys either came back or came into their own toward the end.



Fan Shout
beast (7h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (12h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (15h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
54m / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.