beast
2 years ago

Matt Ryan looks like to be a Colt before end of tomorrow -- per rumors.

Falcons get
Packers 28th overall (660)
QB Jordan Love

Packers get
Falcons 8th overall (1,400)

Based on DrafTek  valuation, this is saying Jordan Love is basically worth 24th overall pick. (Love was drafted 26th overall in 2020)

That being said, Packers probably have to trade the 22nd overall (780) pick instead of 28th. That would then value Love at 30th overall value.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Love isn't getting a huge pick right now... he hasn't proven anything.

Falcons are reportedly going after Marcus Mariota, which both he and the Falcons head coach spend time on the Titans together.

UserPostedImage
dhazer
2 years ago
First off I say we dont trade any of our first 4 picks and we keep Love as we will need someone to cover when Rodgers goes down or retires. I have no clue why you guys keep saying trade Love when we still need him. Also pretty much every team has their QB now with all the trades and FA signings. Plus you still have Jimmy G out there for a trade. I say we draft Williams and come back with Burks or Dotson. I wish they would get the guy that can fly aka a Ty Hill type and I think Williams is that guy.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago
If we trade, do it for a pick next year, and move up at least 10-15 spots.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
2 years ago
This is in another thread but it may be more appropriate here:

Subject to us not signing or trading for a top WR, my draft recommendation would be something like this.

First, we are not going to get London at 22….no chance. He projected between 11-15. I have only seen him past 20 in one projection. Also, perhaps not Wilson or Williams and maybe not Olave…they project 13-21. Therefore, it would be prudent to trade up to make sure you get one of those guys. Also, I would LOVE to have Williams AL, but I don’t know how long it would take for him to get healthy.

Using the point system for trades which seems to be the way to ‘keep it real’, I would package pick 22 and pick 53 together, which totals 1160 points. That puts us at pick 12 or 13, where I would hope to get London or Wilson, if not, then Williams. Then, I still have the pick 28 in the first round, where I would select an OT, perhaps Cross-MissSU, Penning-IA, or Smith-Tulsa.

Go Packers!!!!
Mucky Tundra
2 years ago
If I were trade up, I would only trade up from #28 a few spots by giving up a 4th rounder to grab the last remaining player from a group of several that I would have wanted to grab at #22.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

This is in another thread but it may be more appropriate here:

Subject to us not signing or trading for a top WR, my draft recommendation would be something like this.

First, we are not going to get London at 22….no chance. He projected between 11-15. I have only seen him past 20 in one projection. Also, perhaps not Wilson or Williams and maybe not Olave…they project 13-21. Therefore, it would be prudent to trade up to make sure you get one of those guys. Also, I would LOVE to have Williams AL, but I don’t know how long it would take for him to get healthy.

Using the point system for trades which seems to be the way to ‘keep it real’, I would package pick 22 and pick 53 together, which totals 1160 points. That puts us at pick 12 or 13, where I would hope to get London or Wilson, if not, then Williams. Then, I still have the pick 28 in the first round, where I would select an OT, perhaps Cross-MissSU, Penning-IA, or Smith-Tulsa.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



I have been thinking about this post and the earlier one. A lot of what you say makes sense.

A few comments. If there is a rush on WRs then GB can flip and take a look at another position that is being ignored. Perhaps EDGE or OT. Skyy Moore, George Pickens and Treylon Burks are getting top 25 attention too. You just never know when a GM thinks one of these guys is a better fit for their scheme and takes them ahead of the more touted receivers.

There will be a few teams that panic and grab a QB even though this is a weak year for QBs. That's going to let players the Packers are more interested in fall.

I was looking at a big board that CBS put together. In the top 30 they have 7 WR, 5 CB, 5 EDGE and 4 OT they can't all be gone.

If their board is anything like the Packers real board I can see the #22 pick being a OT and pick 28 being an EDGE rusher. They will circle back and pick up a WR in the 2nd round. The main reason being the difference between WR6 and WR12 is not as great as OT4 and OT8. The same for the EDGE rushers who are available in the 1st and second rounds.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago
High picks are too hard to come by. Get two players, or trade back a few spots and get three.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Nonstopdrivel
2 years ago

If I were trade up, I would only trade up from #28 a few spots by giving up a 4th rounder to grab the last remaining player from a group of several that I would have wanted to grab at #22.

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 


This is so vague that I don’t have the slightest clue what you’re driving at. Or is this a purely a discussion of general draft-day mechanics and tactics?
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
2 years ago

This is so vague that I don’t have the slightest clue what you’re driving at. Or is this a purely a discussion of general draft-day mechanics and tactics?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I thought this thread was which draft picks would you be willing to trade to move up.

To clarify my previous post, imagine GB having an equal rating/grade on a DL, OT, OLB/Edge and WR. Green Bay nabs the DL first at #22. At #23, the OT is drafted and at #25 the WR is drafted. At this point, Green Bay trades the #28 and a 4th rounder to get the #26 draft pick and drafts the OLB/Edge since they don't think he'll last until their pick at #28.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (12h) : 49ers are underdogs at Packers, ending streak of 36 straight games as favorites
Zero2Cool (20h) : 49ers might be down their QB, DL, TE and LT?
packerfanoutwest (22-Nov) : Jaire Alexander says he has a torn PCL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : Even with the context it's ... what?
Mucky Tundra (20-Nov) : Matt LaFleur without context: “I don’t wanna pat you on the butt and you poop in my hand.”
beast (20-Nov) : We brought in a former Packers OL coach to help evaluate OL as a scout
beast (20-Nov) : Jets have been pretty good at picking DL
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He landed good players thanks to high draft slot. He isn't good.
Zero2Cool (20-Nov) : He can shove his knowledge up his ass. He knows nothing.
beast (20-Nov) : More knowledge, just like bring in the Jets head coach
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : What? Why? Huh?
beast (19-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers might to try to bring Douglas in through Milt Hendrickson/Ravens connections
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : The Jets fired Joe Douglas, per sources
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Jets are a mess......
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Pretty sure Jets fired their scouting staff and just pluck former Packers.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Jets sign Anders Carlson to their 53.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : When you cycle the weeks, the total over remains for season. But you get your W/L for that selected week. Confusing.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the total and percentage are the same as the previous weeks
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : the totals are accurate..nrvrtmind
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : I don't follow what you are saying. The totals are not the same as last week.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : ok so then wht are the totals the same as last week?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : NFL Pick'em is auto updated when NFL Scores tab is clicked
Martha Careful (19-Nov) : The offense was OK. Let's not forget the Bear defense is very very good.
packerfanoutwest (19-Nov) : Who updates the leaderboard on NFLPickem?
beast (19-Nov) : Has the Packers offense been worse since the former Jets coach joined the Packers?
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Offense gets his ass in gear, this could be good.
Zero2Cool (19-Nov) : Backup QB helped with three wins. Special Teams contributed to three wins.
bboystyle (18-Nov) : Lions played outside thats why. They scored 16 and 17 in the only 2 outside games this year
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : The rest of the NFL is catching up to Packers ... kicking is an issue throughout league
packerfanoutwest (18-Nov) : Packers DL Kenny Clark: We knew 'we were going to block' Bears' game-winning field goal attempt
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Lions seem to be throttling everyone, but only (only) got 24 lol maybe the rain is why
Zero2Cool (18-Nov) : Packers vs Lions game doesn't seem so bad.
beast (18-Nov) : Dennis Green "They are what we thought they were, and we let them off the hook!"
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : comment of the day Z2Cool "Bears better than we want to admit. Packers worse than we think. It's facts."
Mucky Tundra (17-Nov) : my worst case scenario: Bears fix their oline and get a coach like Johnson from the Lions and his scheme
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Bears get OL fixed amd we might have a problem
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Pretty sure they already have scouting reports on guys who aren't even starting for their college team. The future is now for me.
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : I tend to let Gute and Co. Worry about the future.
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
beast (17-Nov) : That's great news and Packers need to keep upgrading their OL, DL and DBs this off-season, so missing one guy doesn't kill them
buckeyepackfan (17-Nov) : Jaire and Evans Williams are both ACTIVE! Good news.
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : The badgers really need to change the whole offensive scheme. No draws no screens plus the quarterback is marginal
Cheesey (17-Nov) : If the Badgers had a decent QB, they would have won. The guy can't hit a wide open receiver
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : chop block
Martha Careful (17-Nov) : there was a very questionable job Block call that upon viewing replay was very borderline
beast (17-Nov) : How so? (I didn't watch)
Zero2Cool (17-Nov) : Badgers got hosed vs Oregon
packerfanoutwest (16-Nov) : damn,he hasn't played since week 2
Mucky Tundra (15-Nov) : poor guy can't catch a break
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.