beast
2 years ago

Matt Ryan looks like to be a Colt before end of tomorrow -- per rumors.

Falcons get
Packers 28th overall (660)
QB Jordan Love

Packers get
Falcons 8th overall (1,400)

Based on DrafTek  valuation, this is saying Jordan Love is basically worth 24th overall pick. (Love was drafted 26th overall in 2020)

That being said, Packers probably have to trade the 22nd overall (780) pick instead of 28th. That would then value Love at 30th overall value.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Love isn't getting a huge pick right now... he hasn't proven anything.

Falcons are reportedly going after Marcus Mariota, which both he and the Falcons head coach spend time on the Titans together.

UserPostedImage
dhazer
2 years ago
First off I say we dont trade any of our first 4 picks and we keep Love as we will need someone to cover when Rodgers goes down or retires. I have no clue why you guys keep saying trade Love when we still need him. Also pretty much every team has their QB now with all the trades and FA signings. Plus you still have Jimmy G out there for a trade. I say we draft Williams and come back with Burks or Dotson. I wish they would get the guy that can fly aka a Ty Hill type and I think Williams is that guy.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be šŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago
If we trade, do it for a pick next year, and move up at least 10-15 spots.
ā€œWinning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a whileā€¦you do them right all the time.ā€
2 years ago
This is in another thread but it may be more appropriate here:

Subject to us not signing or trading for a top WR, my draft recommendation would be something like this.

First, we are not going to get London at 22ā€¦.no chance. He projected between 11-15. I have only seen him past 20 in one projection. Also, perhaps not Wilson or Williams and maybe not Olaveā€¦they project 13-21. Therefore, it would be prudent to trade up to make sure you get one of those guys. Also, I would LOVE to have Williams AL, but I donā€™t know how long it would take for him to get healthy.

Using the point system for trades which seems to be the way to ā€˜keep it realā€™, I would package pick 22 and pick 53 together, which totals 1160 points. That puts us at pick 12 or 13, where I would hope to get London or Wilson, if not, then Williams. Then, I still have the pick 28 in the first round, where I would select an OT, perhaps Cross-MissSU, Penning-IA, or Smith-Tulsa.

Go Packers!!!!
Mucky Tundra
2 years ago
If I were trade up, I would only trade up from #28 a few spots by giving up a 4th rounder to grab the last remaining player from a group of several that I would have wanted to grab at #22.
ā€œNah. I like having the island. Itā€™s pretty cool...not too many visitorsā€
UserPostedImage
"Iā€™ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

This is in another thread but it may be more appropriate here:

Subject to us not signing or trading for a top WR, my draft recommendation would be something like this.

First, we are not going to get London at 22ā€¦.no chance. He projected between 11-15. I have only seen him past 20 in one projection. Also, perhaps not Wilson or Williams and maybe not Olaveā€¦they project 13-21. Therefore, it would be prudent to trade up to make sure you get one of those guys. Also, I would LOVE to have Williams AL, but I donā€™t know how long it would take for him to get healthy.

Using the point system for trades which seems to be the way to ā€˜keep it realā€™, I would package pick 22 and pick 53 together, which totals 1160 points. That puts us at pick 12 or 13, where I would hope to get London or Wilson, if not, then Williams. Then, I still have the pick 28 in the first round, where I would select an OT, perhaps Cross-MissSU, Penning-IA, or Smith-Tulsa.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



I have been thinking about this post and the earlier one. A lot of what you say makes sense.

A few comments. If there is a rush on WRs then GB can flip and take a look at another position that is being ignored. Perhaps EDGE or OT. Skyy Moore, George Pickens and Treylon Burks are getting top 25 attention too. You just never know when a GM thinks one of these guys is a better fit for their scheme and takes them ahead of the more touted receivers.

There will be a few teams that panic and grab a QB even though this is a weak year for QBs. That's going to let players the Packers are more interested in fall.

I was looking at a big board that CBS put together. In the top 30 they have 7 WR, 5 CB, 5 EDGE and 4 OT they can't all be gone.

If their board is anything like the Packers real board I can see the #22 pick being a OT and pick 28 being an EDGE rusher. They will circle back and pick up a WR in the 2nd round. The main reason being the difference between WR6 and WR12 is not as great as OT4 and OT8. The same for the EDGE rushers who are available in the 1st and second rounds.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago
High picks are too hard to come by. Get two players, or trade back a few spots and get three.
ā€œWinning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a whileā€¦you do them right all the time.ā€
Nonstopdrivel
2 years ago

If I were trade up, I would only trade up from #28 a few spots by giving up a 4th rounder to grab the last remaining player from a group of several that I would have wanted to grab at #22.

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 


This is so vague that I donā€™t have the slightest clue what youā€™re driving at. Or is this a purely a discussion of general draft-day mechanics and tactics?
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
2 years ago

This is so vague that I donā€™t have the slightest clue what youā€™re driving at. Or is this a purely a discussion of general draft-day mechanics and tactics?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I thought this thread was which draft picks would you be willing to trade to move up.

To clarify my previous post, imagine GB having an equal rating/grade on a DL, OT, OLB/Edge and WR. Green Bay nabs the DL first at #22. At #23, the OT is drafted and at #25 the WR is drafted. At this point, Green Bay trades the #28 and a 4th rounder to get the #26 draft pick and drafts the OLB/Edge since they don't think he'll last until their pick at #28.
ā€œNah. I like having the island. Itā€™s pretty cool...not too many visitorsā€
UserPostedImage
"Iā€™ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (3h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (5h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (6h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (7h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! šŸ˜
Zero2Cool (7h) : Thank you
wpr (7h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (7h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (7h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (7h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (8h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (8h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (8h) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (8h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (8h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

8h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.