beast
2 years ago

Matt Ryan looks like to be a Colt before end of tomorrow -- per rumors.

Falcons get
Packers 28th overall (660)
QB Jordan Love

Packers get
Falcons 8th overall (1,400)

Based on DrafTek  valuation, this is saying Jordan Love is basically worth 24th overall pick. (Love was drafted 26th overall in 2020)

That being said, Packers probably have to trade the 22nd overall (780) pick instead of 28th. That would then value Love at 30th overall value.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Love isn't getting a huge pick right now... he hasn't proven anything.

Falcons are reportedly going after Marcus Mariota, which both he and the Falcons head coach spend time on the Titans together.

UserPostedImage
dhazer
2 years ago
First off I say we dont trade any of our first 4 picks and we keep Love as we will need someone to cover when Rodgers goes down or retires. I have no clue why you guys keep saying trade Love when we still need him. Also pretty much every team has their QB now with all the trades and FA signings. Plus you still have Jimmy G out there for a trade. I say we draft Williams and come back with Burks or Dotson. I wish they would get the guy that can fly aka a Ty Hill type and I think Williams is that guy.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be šŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago
If we trade, do it for a pick next year, and move up at least 10-15 spots.
ā€œWinning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a whileā€¦you do them right all the time.ā€
2 years ago
This is in another thread but it may be more appropriate here:

Subject to us not signing or trading for a top WR, my draft recommendation would be something like this.

First, we are not going to get London at 22ā€¦.no chance. He projected between 11-15. I have only seen him past 20 in one projection. Also, perhaps not Wilson or Williams and maybe not Olaveā€¦they project 13-21. Therefore, it would be prudent to trade up to make sure you get one of those guys. Also, I would LOVE to have Williams AL, but I donā€™t know how long it would take for him to get healthy.

Using the point system for trades which seems to be the way to ā€˜keep it realā€™, I would package pick 22 and pick 53 together, which totals 1160 points. That puts us at pick 12 or 13, where I would hope to get London or Wilson, if not, then Williams. Then, I still have the pick 28 in the first round, where I would select an OT, perhaps Cross-MissSU, Penning-IA, or Smith-Tulsa.

Go Packers!!!!
Mucky Tundra
2 years ago
If I were trade up, I would only trade up from #28 a few spots by giving up a 4th rounder to grab the last remaining player from a group of several that I would have wanted to grab at #22.
ā€œNah. I like having the island. Itā€™s pretty cool...not too many visitorsā€
UserPostedImage
"Iā€™ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
2 years ago

This is in another thread but it may be more appropriate here:

Subject to us not signing or trading for a top WR, my draft recommendation would be something like this.

First, we are not going to get London at 22ā€¦.no chance. He projected between 11-15. I have only seen him past 20 in one projection. Also, perhaps not Wilson or Williams and maybe not Olaveā€¦they project 13-21. Therefore, it would be prudent to trade up to make sure you get one of those guys. Also, I would LOVE to have Williams AL, but I donā€™t know how long it would take for him to get healthy.

Using the point system for trades which seems to be the way to ā€˜keep it realā€™, I would package pick 22 and pick 53 together, which totals 1160 points. That puts us at pick 12 or 13, where I would hope to get London or Wilson, if not, then Williams. Then, I still have the pick 28 in the first round, where I would select an OT, perhaps Cross-MissSU, Penning-IA, or Smith-Tulsa.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 



I have been thinking about this post and the earlier one. A lot of what you say makes sense.

A few comments. If there is a rush on WRs then GB can flip and take a look at another position that is being ignored. Perhaps EDGE or OT. Skyy Moore, George Pickens and Treylon Burks are getting top 25 attention too. You just never know when a GM thinks one of these guys is a better fit for their scheme and takes them ahead of the more touted receivers.

There will be a few teams that panic and grab a QB even though this is a weak year for QBs. That's going to let players the Packers are more interested in fall.

I was looking at a big board that CBS put together. In the top 30 they have 7 WR, 5 CB, 5 EDGE and 4 OT they can't all be gone.

If their board is anything like the Packers real board I can see the #22 pick being a OT and pick 28 being an EDGE rusher. They will circle back and pick up a WR in the 2nd round. The main reason being the difference between WR6 and WR12 is not as great as OT4 and OT8. The same for the EDGE rushers who are available in the 1st and second rounds.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago
High picks are too hard to come by. Get two players, or trade back a few spots and get three.
ā€œWinning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a whileā€¦you do them right all the time.ā€
Nonstopdrivel
2 years ago

If I were trade up, I would only trade up from #28 a few spots by giving up a 4th rounder to grab the last remaining player from a group of several that I would have wanted to grab at #22.

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 


This is so vague that I donā€™t have the slightest clue what youā€™re driving at. Or is this a purely a discussion of general draft-day mechanics and tactics?
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
2 years ago

This is so vague that I donā€™t have the slightest clue what youā€™re driving at. Or is this a purely a discussion of general draft-day mechanics and tactics?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I thought this thread was which draft picks would you be willing to trade to move up.

To clarify my previous post, imagine GB having an equal rating/grade on a DL, OT, OLB/Edge and WR. Green Bay nabs the DL first at #22. At #23, the OT is drafted and at #25 the WR is drafted. At this point, Green Bay trades the #28 and a 4th rounder to get the #26 draft pick and drafts the OLB/Edge since they don't think he'll last until their pick at #28.
ā€œNah. I like having the island. Itā€™s pretty cool...not too many visitorsā€
UserPostedImage
"Iā€™ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Fan Shout
bboystyle (now) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (9m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (30m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (38m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (50m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
now / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.