Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I think the Packers will make a trade, but it will be out of the 1st round.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


Yes sir, been saying this for awhile as well now. Unless, someone falls to the Packers kind of like Aaron Rodgers did.

I think instead of trading our players for a shot at a pass rusher, we should send our second rounder to Miami for Cameron Wake. He's pissed they won't give him a new contract. Last time we played the Fish, Wake turned our Bulaga whale into a flounder.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Bryan Bulaga IS a flounder. That's not a slam on Cameron Wake. He is good. I don't think the Packers will trade a 2nd round pick for a guy who's wanting a contract when they have several key core players needing contracts soon as well. Greg Jennings namely and they are probably going to re-do Aaron Rodgers soon, plus they have to re-sign Clay Matthews III.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago


Bryan Bulaga IS a flounder. That's not a slam on Cameron Wake. He is good. I don't think the Packers will trade a 2nd round pick for a guy who's wanting a contract when they have several key core players needing contracts soon as well. Greg Jennings namely and they are probably going to re-do Aaron Rodgers soon, plus they have to re-sign Clay Matthews III.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Just so we have enough money to keep Clifton and Driver on the team so all the nostalgia boys have a visual to go along with their memories of what they use to be able to do. [sarcasm]

Christ, Wake would solve our pass rushing problem, but yeah we should just dick around with drafting potential instead of a sure thing. We got lucky with Matthews, but I doubt that happens again.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Just so we have enough money to keep Clifton and Driver on the team so all the nostalgia boys have a visual to go along with their memories of what they use to be able to do. [sarcasm]

Christ, Wake would solve our pass rushing problem, but yeah we should just dick around with drafting potential instead of a sure thing. We got lucky with Matthews, but I doubt that happens again.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



How do Chad Clifton and Donald Driver get mentioned when I brought up core players such as Aaron Rodgers, Greg Jennings and Clay Matthews III? Clifton and Driver need their contracts reworked, especially Driver if he makes the final cut.

I understand Cameron Wake is more valuable to the Packers than a 2nd round pick, potentially, but what about the salary he's going to take? You can't spend your dollars twice, which means you sign Cameron Wake instead of ... ??? I think the only of those three mentioned the Packers could get by with out is Greg Jennings.

Again, you cannot spend the salary cap twice. Once you spend 100 million, you don't get to spend another 100 million. Last time I had to explain this was to my ex girlfriend after she wrote out the rent check, then went on a spending spree because "well honey the money was there... i dunno".
UserPostedImage
play2win
13 years ago

We won a SB because we played our best football down the stretch. That doesn't negate the fact that Green Bay's offense is more dangerous WITH Finley than without him. Do we really need to revisit the ways he is used in the offense and the matchup problems it creates for opposing defenses? That's SOOOO 2011.

I'll eat his drops -- which aren't unique, but rather unfortunately endemic of Green Bay skill position players -- if it means we get all the other bonuses. Yeah, his numbers aren't through the roof, but it we are also a buhjillion deep at receiving options. Finley is a stud.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



I love that song! Saw Radiohead in Phoenix last month.

Yeah, I understand where you are coming from. I know how he presents matchup problems. My thinking is that sometimes, or rather, most often, you have to give up something to get something.

I personally think we would be better served, adding 2 top flight pass rushers in this draft, and letting go of a guy who I like, but I think we can not only survive without, but in this case, possibly WIN OUT in this upcoming season. That's all. Finley is indeed a stud. Because of that, he would be very, very attractive to all of those teams in need of help at their skill positions.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I truly feel Jermichael Finley's drops were related to him trying to prove he can play a full season and trying to over perform during his contract year. I don't recall Finley having issues catching before. Finley was catching difficult passes, while dropping the easy ones and that there says it's a lack of concentration. He played a full season, has a new contract and I'm expecting him to solid this year for the Packers.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

I truly feel Jermichael Finley's drops were related to him trying to prove he can play a full season and trying to over perform during his contract year. I don't recall Finley having issues catching before. Finley was catching difficult passes, while dropping the easy ones and that there says it's a lack of concentration. He played a full season, has a new contract and I'm expecting him to solid this year for the Packers.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I understand that. Now, let's just say Finley catches 100% of the passes in his hands in 2012. Still, I'd rather have an elite pass rusher than an elite TE. Our D fell from #2 to #19 last year. With Finley, our O rose from #6 to #1. The 2010 team > 2011 team and the difference was the lack of pass rush.

With hopes, I'm with Play2Win. I don't see it happening though unfortunately. Everyone wants to keep their elite pass rushers as the secret is out - you can beat an elite passing team with an elite pass rush. Everyone in the NFL knows that now.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DoddPower
13 years ago
As with many other elite QBs, I feel as if Aaron Rodger's could take a lesser receiving core and be almost as successful. Sacrifice a bit for the offense and put that money into having a top 5 defense and I think we would be a much better team. I understand it's much easier said than done, but it's just a thought. I know Thompson wants to surround Rodger's with weapons, which is great, but it shouldn't be at the expense of the defense. Thompson seems to be a WR guru, so I'm confident we could maintain a solid receiving core and have a potent offense without having huge salaries at every position. Sacrifice one weapon on offense and add an equal player to the defense and I think the Packers improve.

If it was only so easy as waving a magic wand. Is it Thursday yet (draft time)???
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I understand that. Now, let's just say Finley catches 100% of the passes in his hands in 2012. Still, I'd rather have an elite pass rusher than an elite TE. Our D fell from #2 to #19 last year. With Finley, our O rose from #6 to #1. The 2010 team > 2011 team and the difference was the lack of pass rush.

With hopes, I'm with Play2Win. I don't see it happening though unfortunately. Everyone wants to keep their elite pass rushers as the secret is out - you can beat an elite passing team with an elite pass rush. Everyone in the NFL knows that now.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



I don't think I said an elite TE is more valuable than an elite pass rushing specialist. Not sure if you were implying that or not, either way, it's clear now.

As the comment above says, Aaron Rodgers can make lesser TE better. I wouldn't object to the proposed trade of a 2nd rounder for Cameron Wake. I'm saying it won't happen because of money. However, trading Finley for Wake is much more likely because you get some cap relief in trading Finley, right? I'm assuming he's on the books for about $7 million when I'm saying this, lol.
UserPostedImage
play2win
13 years ago
Zero2Cool, that is the other component that makes trading one of our existing players attractive for GB. A bit of cap relief will come in handy when trying to extend/resign Matthews, Jennings, Rodgers, Raji - all of whom I think we should try to keep. If that means we lose Finley or Jones, or both, and add a top DE or OLB in the draft, well that seems like a win-win.

I like Finley and Jones, both of them. I just am looking at it from a perspective of "what do we have that other teams want, that won't hurt us too badly to part with." Have to admit, even with Quarless out, we still have 3 TEs besides Finley. Most years we carried 3 on the roster until they shifted to 5 and ditched the extra RB/FB for special teams core players.

Not saying it has to happen either. We could conceivably land two or three great pass rushers without trade straight up if Ted can pick them right. I don't know how they have the players stacked either, and I wouldn't presume to know. Maybe there is no one worth making a move like this, but I kind of doubt that. If we go to camp with all of our WRs and let DD retire, wow. We will still be very, very formidable on O. Add the right players where we need them on D and we can make the run. Either way, I'll be happy, only as long as they add the pass rush we need. He has the picks and players to make many moves that would better insure we get who we want.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I don't know where you're going with that, but all I'm saying is, I'd rather the Packers drop $7 million a year on a solid pass rusher than an elite TE. Bringing up James Jones as trade bait when as a free agent no one wanted him, doesn't really do much for your angle, lol.

Good point on B.J. Raji, he's also a core player that will need to be resigned either this year or next. I had forgot about him.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21h / Community Welcome! / lijog

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.