Zero2Cool
12 years ago

I think the Packers will make a trade, but it will be out of the 1st round.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 


Yes sir, been saying this for awhile as well now. Unless, someone falls to the Packers kind of like Aaron Rodgers did.

I think instead of trading our players for a shot at a pass rusher, we should send our second rounder to Miami for Cameron Wake. He's pissed they won't give him a new contract. Last time we played the Fish, Wake turned our Bulaga whale into a flounder.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Bryan Bulaga IS a flounder. That's not a slam on Cameron Wake. He is good. I don't think the Packers will trade a 2nd round pick for a guy who's wanting a contract when they have several key core players needing contracts soon as well. Greg Jennings namely and they are probably going to re-do Aaron Rodgers soon, plus they have to re-sign Clay Matthews III.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
12 years ago


Bryan Bulaga IS a flounder. That's not a slam on Cameron Wake. He is good. I don't think the Packers will trade a 2nd round pick for a guy who's wanting a contract when they have several key core players needing contracts soon as well. Greg Jennings namely and they are probably going to re-do Aaron Rodgers soon, plus they have to re-sign Clay Matthews III.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Just so we have enough money to keep Clifton and Driver on the team so all the nostalgia boys have a visual to go along with their memories of what they use to be able to do. [sarcasm]

Christ, Wake would solve our pass rushing problem, but yeah we should just dick around with drafting potential instead of a sure thing. We got lucky with Matthews, but I doubt that happens again.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

Just so we have enough money to keep Clifton and Driver on the team so all the nostalgia boys have a visual to go along with their memories of what they use to be able to do. [sarcasm]

Christ, Wake would solve our pass rushing problem, but yeah we should just dick around with drafting potential instead of a sure thing. We got lucky with Matthews, but I doubt that happens again.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



How do Chad Clifton and Donald Driver get mentioned when I brought up core players such as Aaron Rodgers, Greg Jennings and Clay Matthews III? Clifton and Driver need their contracts reworked, especially Driver if he makes the final cut.

I understand Cameron Wake is more valuable to the Packers than a 2nd round pick, potentially, but what about the salary he's going to take? You can't spend your dollars twice, which means you sign Cameron Wake instead of ... ??? I think the only of those three mentioned the Packers could get by with out is Greg Jennings.

Again, you cannot spend the salary cap twice. Once you spend 100 million, you don't get to spend another 100 million. Last time I had to explain this was to my ex girlfriend after she wrote out the rent check, then went on a spending spree because "well honey the money was there... i dunno".
UserPostedImage
play2win
12 years ago

We won a SB because we played our best football down the stretch. That doesn't negate the fact that Green Bay's offense is more dangerous WITH Finley than without him. Do we really need to revisit the ways he is used in the offense and the matchup problems it creates for opposing defenses? That's SOOOO 2011.

I'll eat his drops -- which aren't unique, but rather unfortunately endemic of Green Bay skill position players -- if it means we get all the other bonuses. Yeah, his numbers aren't through the roof, but it we are also a buhjillion deep at receiving options. Finley is a stud.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



I love that song! Saw Radiohead in Phoenix last month.

Yeah, I understand where you are coming from. I know how he presents matchup problems. My thinking is that sometimes, or rather, most often, you have to give up something to get something.

I personally think we would be better served, adding 2 top flight pass rushers in this draft, and letting go of a guy who I like, but I think we can not only survive without, but in this case, possibly WIN OUT in this upcoming season. That's all. Finley is indeed a stud. Because of that, he would be very, very attractive to all of those teams in need of help at their skill positions.
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
I truly feel Jermichael Finley's drops were related to him trying to prove he can play a full season and trying to over perform during his contract year. I don't recall Finley having issues catching before. Finley was catching difficult passes, while dropping the easy ones and that there says it's a lack of concentration. He played a full season, has a new contract and I'm expecting him to solid this year for the Packers.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago

I truly feel Jermichael Finley's drops were related to him trying to prove he can play a full season and trying to over perform during his contract year. I don't recall Finley having issues catching before. Finley was catching difficult passes, while dropping the easy ones and that there says it's a lack of concentration. He played a full season, has a new contract and I'm expecting him to solid this year for the Packers.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I understand that. Now, let's just say Finley catches 100% of the passes in his hands in 2012. Still, I'd rather have an elite pass rusher than an elite TE. Our D fell from #2 to #19 last year. With Finley, our O rose from #6 to #1. The 2010 team > 2011 team and the difference was the lack of pass rush.

With hopes, I'm with Play2Win. I don't see it happening though unfortunately. Everyone wants to keep their elite pass rushers as the secret is out - you can beat an elite passing team with an elite pass rush. Everyone in the NFL knows that now.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DoddPower
12 years ago
As with many other elite QBs, I feel as if Aaron Rodger's could take a lesser receiving core and be almost as successful. Sacrifice a bit for the offense and put that money into having a top 5 defense and I think we would be a much better team. I understand it's much easier said than done, but it's just a thought. I know Thompson wants to surround Rodger's with weapons, which is great, but it shouldn't be at the expense of the defense. Thompson seems to be a WR guru, so I'm confident we could maintain a solid receiving core and have a potent offense without having huge salaries at every position. Sacrifice one weapon on offense and add an equal player to the defense and I think the Packers improve.

If it was only so easy as waving a magic wand. Is it Thursday yet (draft time)???
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

I understand that. Now, let's just say Finley catches 100% of the passes in his hands in 2012. Still, I'd rather have an elite pass rusher than an elite TE. Our D fell from #2 to #19 last year. With Finley, our O rose from #6 to #1. The 2010 team > 2011 team and the difference was the lack of pass rush.

With hopes, I'm with Play2Win. I don't see it happening though unfortunately. Everyone wants to keep their elite pass rushers as the secret is out - you can beat an elite passing team with an elite pass rush. Everyone in the NFL knows that now.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



I don't think I said an elite TE is more valuable than an elite pass rushing specialist. Not sure if you were implying that or not, either way, it's clear now.

As the comment above says, Aaron Rodgers can make lesser TE better. I wouldn't object to the proposed trade of a 2nd rounder for Cameron Wake. I'm saying it won't happen because of money. However, trading Finley for Wake is much more likely because you get some cap relief in trading Finley, right? I'm assuming he's on the books for about $7 million when I'm saying this, lol.
UserPostedImage
play2win
12 years ago
Zero2Cool, that is the other component that makes trading one of our existing players attractive for GB. A bit of cap relief will come in handy when trying to extend/resign Matthews, Jennings, Rodgers, Raji - all of whom I think we should try to keep. If that means we lose Finley or Jones, or both, and add a top DE or OLB in the draft, well that seems like a win-win.

I like Finley and Jones, both of them. I just am looking at it from a perspective of "what do we have that other teams want, that won't hurt us too badly to part with." Have to admit, even with Quarless out, we still have 3 TEs besides Finley. Most years we carried 3 on the roster until they shifted to 5 and ditched the extra RB/FB for special teams core players.

Not saying it has to happen either. We could conceivably land two or three great pass rushers without trade straight up if Ted can pick them right. I don't know how they have the players stacked either, and I wouldn't presume to know. Maybe there is no one worth making a move like this, but I kind of doubt that. If we go to camp with all of our WRs and let DD retire, wow. We will still be very, very formidable on O. Add the right players where we need them on D and we can make the run. Either way, I'll be happy, only as long as they add the pass rush we need. He has the picks and players to make many moves that would better insure we get who we want.
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
I don't know where you're going with that, but all I'm saying is, I'd rather the Packers drop $7 million a year on a solid pass rusher than an elite TE. Bringing up James Jones as trade bait when as a free agent no one wanted him, doesn't really do much for your angle, lol.

Good point on B.J. Raji, he's also a core player that will need to be resigned either this year or next. I had forgot about him.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : NFL moves Vikings-Rams playoff tilt to Arizona due to fires
Zero2Cool (2h) : Rams lose home field advantage for Monday game.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Notre Lame=Notre Dame, Luckeyes=Ohio State, Pedo St=Penn St
Zero2Cool (18h) : ... It clearly was not what we were supposed to be in, certainly."
Zero2Cool (18h) : Hafley says 3rd and 11 call there was a miscommunication.
Zero2Cool (19h) : The only team I know is Texas from that. Who are the other three?
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Stud
Zero2Cool (22h) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY
beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
20h / Around The NFL / beast

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.