zombieslayer
12 years ago
Some of you seem to think it's the end of the world if Finley doesn't come back.

Let's set the record straight. We won the SB without him.

With Finley out of the line-up, 🇦🇷 spreads the ball around more. He doesn't focus so much on Finley. Our O last year wasn't as good points wise, but it stayed on the field. It was still an elite O. It just wasn't the #1 O.

The focus on the off season needs to be on D, not O. I was wrong this year to think that the O could have carried this team all the way. I see it now.

D needs to be the #1 priority. If Finley wants too much money, let him walk. We'll need to spend that $$$ on D.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
blueleopard
12 years ago

Some of you seem to think it's the end of the world if Finley doesn't come back.

Let's set the record straight. We won the SB without him.

With Finley out of the line-up, 🇦🇷 spreads the ball around more. He doesn't focus so much on Finley. Our O last year wasn't as good points wise, but it stayed on the field. It was still an elite O. It just wasn't the #1 O.

The focus on the off season needs to be on D, not O. I was wrong this year to think that the O could have carried this team all the way. I see it now.

D needs to be the #1 priority. If Finley wants too much money, let him walk. We'll need to spend that $$$ on D.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
Rios39
12 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 




We need an immediate impact from this draft. Much like the one we drafted Raji and traded for Clay. We need to draft for some need this year. When you are building up, gotta always draft best player available. But in the first few rounds THIS year we need to draft for need..Defense then OL and then after that we can focus on best player available, we have had success with lower round draft picks too.
blank
DoddPower
12 years ago

We need an immediate impact from this draft. Much like the one we drafted Raji and traded for Clay. We need to draft for some need this year. When you are building up, gotta always draft best player available. But in the first few rounds THIS year we need to draft for need..Defense then OL and then after that we can focus on best player available, we have had success with lower round draft picks too.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 




Eh, drafting for need will more often than not end up in busts. A GM has to largely draft BPA unless of course BPA and need are almost one and the same. If a team has too many elite players, some type of trade can likely be pulled off for a proven player, or just improve the team by allowing the better players to take over for average or serviceable players. If one is attempting to specifically fill a need, it should likely be done via free agency.

One way to "draft for need" I suppose is by trading up and getting a guy that absolutely fills the hole and is incredibly talented. That's risky to start trading away picks, but it could be effective. Perhaps, as you stated, we will see something like that again this year. Or ever better, some type of magic trade for Flynn/Finley/James Jones. It should be an interesting season. I expect to be in serious contention for the super bowl next season.

Wouldn't JJ Watt look nice in green and gold? heh heh.
zombieslayer
12 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



Let's not forget the 2009 draft when 🇹🇹 grabbed 2 first rounders, with the expectations that both would be studs. One of them will be a perennial Pro Bowler (CM3) and the other is pretty good (but unfortunately overrated).

You CAN get guys with immediate impact from drafts. Plus, let's not rule out 🇹🇹 making a trade.

So the question I have for you is purely hypothetical. Let's say YOU are Ted, and another team wants Finley. They offer a studly defender for Finley. Do you pull the trigger?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rios39
12 years ago

Eh, drafting for need will more often than not end up in busts. A GM has to largely draft BPA unless of course BPA and need are almost one and the same. If a team has too many elite players, some type of trade can likely be pulled off for a proven player, or just improve the team by allowing the better players to take over for average or serviceable players. If one is attempting to specifically fill a need, it should likely be done via free agency.

One way to "draft for need" I suppose is by trading up and getting a guy that absolutely fills the hole and is incredibly talented. That's risky to start trading away picks, but it could be effective. Perhaps, as you stated, we will see something like that again this year. Or ever better, some type of magic trade for Flynn/Finley/James Jones. It should be an interesting season. I expect to be in serious contention for the super bowl next season.

Wouldn't JJ Watt look nice in green and gold? heh heh.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



Well I don't we can go in and say "Ok we need a LB, a DE, a safety, a CB and draft 1-4 rounds like that. But I think you draft the best defensive player that would fit our scheme and make an impact right away. LB, DE whatever... I don't really see a CB as a first round pick unless he's crazy good.

After the 2nd round you get into a situation of needing best player available no matter what position.
blank
DakotaT
12 years ago
You move Wood to safety with Burnett, Davon House gets moved up to nickel corner. You use the first and second picks on either an OLB or DE. Always use your free agent money for your own players first, so we sign up Finley a keep the offense in tact. I doubt Mario Williams is an option for Green Bay, but our Dline does need some restocking. But priority number one has to be finding Clay's bookend, cause we can't play this defense without that player.
UserPostedImage
porky88
12 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 


The Packers are not making a splash in free agency unless somebody actually wants to play in Green Bay for a lesser price. That probably won't happen, so I agree that bringing back Finley is probably the biggest move the Packers will make in terms of free agency.

However, I disagree with the Packers not drafting for impact in the draft. They constantly grab rookies and plug them in as starters. It hasn't happen as much this year because the team is better than year's past, but I would not be shocked to see two rookies starting on the defensive side of the football next year. Remember, Bryan Bulaga started as a rookie and Morgan Burnett would've started as a rookie if he didn't get hurt. We'll have rookie starters next season, especially with a fairly strong draft.
GoPack1984
12 years ago
I see Finley getting the franchise tag if they don't work out a deal. I don't think there is anyway he isn't a Packer next year. I agree with blueleopard that he opens up routes for the other receivers. If the receivers were having trouble getting open yesterday (and they were), just imagine how hard it will be for them with no Finley. He's too valuable to let go.
blank
Rios39
12 years ago
Finleys latest Tweet while out to the movies.


JermichaelF88 Jermichael Finley
Damn I just dropped the popcorn. Lol
4 minutes ago
blank
Fan Shout
beast (22h) : The way Ballentine leg bent, I wouldn't be surprised if misses games
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : Corey Ballentine and Edgerrin Cooper still not practicing.
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : Basically, today is Friday for Packers.
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : Jaire Alexander & Romeo Doubs continue to practice.
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : Sharpe and Holmgren are Hall of Fame finalists.
beast (3-Dec) : I completely agree with you... I'm shocked that he's listed as practicing of any kind without be cleared of the protocol
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : I thought once practicing, they were out of protocol. so it is news to me
beast (3-Dec) : Even LaFleur is saying "I don’t know all the nuances of that. They just tell me when he’s cleared.”
beast (3-Dec) : Interesting that a player can BOTH be limited practicing and also in the concussion protocols... even LaFleur is saying "I don’t know all th
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : And the reason I think it is BS, is Bill isn't going to pine for a job that's not available. He respects the whole coaching people thing
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : I think it's BS. Jets thought win now with Rodgers, not happening.
beast (3-Dec) : The rumor could be BS... but supposedly Belichick wouldn't like the Cowboys because then he'd have Jerry Jones butting in all the time
beast (3-Dec) : And Belichick wants an owner that will be hands off and let a head coach fully steer the boat, and supposedly Jaguars owner is hands off
beast (3-Dec) : Jaguars job because it's the closest job that might be available near his house in Jupiter Florida. And Belichick wants an owner that....
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : No reason to want Jaguars job, or Rodgers.
Zero2Cool (3-Dec) : Doubs still in protocol
Mucky Tundra (3-Dec) : That's an...interesting rumor
beast (3-Dec) : Rumor, Bill Belichick is eyeing both the Jaguars and Aaron Rodgers for 2025... who knows if he'll be able to get either
beast (3-Dec) : Based on numbers, Broncos and Browns had a wild one
beast (3-Dec) : Alexander and Doubs were back at practice
Mucky Tundra (2-Dec) : hey where's the game day thread for the Lions?
Mucky Tundra (2-Dec) : Should we though?
Zero2Cool (2-Dec) : Edgerrin Cooper, Corey Ballentine and Elgton Jenkins miss Monday practice
Zero2Cool (2-Dec) : We should talk Fantasy Football.
Zero2Cool (2-Dec) : No.
beast (2-Dec) : Will Rodgers keep copying Brett and join the Vikings next?
packerfanoutwest (2-Dec) : Rodgers needs to retire tomorrow
Mucky Tundra (2-Dec) : And you're still winning easily because I started all the wrong guys
buckeyepackfan (1-Dec) : MVS another td catch for The Saints
buckeyepackfan (1-Dec) : Tucker killing me in our FFL 2 missed Fg's 1 missed pat. lol
Zero2Cool (1-Dec) : Kickin ain't easy.
beast (1-Dec) : Anders Carlson hasn't missed a FG since Packers released him, including 50+ yarders... but has missed a couple of extra points
Mucky Tundra (1-Dec) : Justin Tucker with a missed PAT, what's going on with him this year?
Mucky Tundra (1-Dec) : That and just missing some games that were toss ups based on the Vegas line
Mucky Tundra (1-Dec) : Regarding pfow and Pick'em, I think he leaned too hard on "Everyone is picking Team A so I'll pick Team B"
beast (1-Dec) : I think Packers 1st playoff game might be Packers @ Seahawks, which we'll have in the regular season in two weeks
beast (1-Dec) : Yeah, Cardinals got me all excited for nothing... they choked. As of right now, we might get a playoff preview in 2 weeks
beast (1-Dec) : Did packerfanoutwest self-sabotage his pick'em? Doing so well, then this week
beast (1-Dec) : Did packerfanoutwest self-sabotage his pick'em? Doing so well, then this week
Mucky Tundra (1-Dec) : Also, shame on Arizona! Could have done us a solid by beating Minnesota
Mucky Tundra (1-Dec) : Just bring it dork!1!!
Zero2Cool (1-Dec) : I will fight you!!
Mucky Tundra (1-Dec) : you mean you weren't already? :P
Zero2Cool (1-Dec) : Christmas Tree and lawn thingies are up. Time to turn into Grinch now!
Mucky Tundra (29-Nov) : Mahomes Magic baby! *cough*
TheKanataThrilla (29-Nov) : KC the luckiest team in the league
Zero2Cool (29-Nov) : Frigging host issues for site again
beast (29-Nov) : For the first time in their long history, the Bears fire their head coach mid-season. Which comes after three very close in-division losses.
Zero2Cool (29-Nov) : At the game now. Kampman and Cullen Jenkins are here.
buckeyepackfan (29-Nov) : Happy Thanksgiving Packer Fans! Gonna celebrate with some grilled Dolphin later!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

3-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

30-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.