zombieslayer
12 years ago
Some of you seem to think it's the end of the world if Finley doesn't come back.

Let's set the record straight. We won the SB without him.

With Finley out of the line-up, πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· spreads the ball around more. He doesn't focus so much on Finley. Our O last year wasn't as good points wise, but it stayed on the field. It was still an elite O. It just wasn't the #1 O.

The focus on the off season needs to be on D, not O. I was wrong this year to think that the O could have carried this team all the way. I see it now.

D needs to be the #1 priority. If Finley wants too much money, let him walk. We'll need to spend that $$$ on D.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
blueleopard
12 years ago

Some of you seem to think it's the end of the world if Finley doesn't come back.

Let's set the record straight. We won the SB without him.

With Finley out of the line-up, πŸ‡¦πŸ‡· spreads the ball around more. He doesn't focus so much on Finley. Our O last year wasn't as good points wise, but it stayed on the field. It was still an elite O. It just wasn't the #1 O.

The focus on the off season needs to be on D, not O. I was wrong this year to think that the O could have carried this team all the way. I see it now.

D needs to be the #1 priority. If Finley wants too much money, let him walk. We'll need to spend that $$$ on D.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
Rios39
12 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 




We need an immediate impact from this draft. Much like the one we drafted Raji and traded for Clay. We need to draft for some need this year. When you are building up, gotta always draft best player available. But in the first few rounds THIS year we need to draft for need..Defense then OL and then after that we can focus on best player available, we have had success with lower round draft picks too.
blank
DoddPower
12 years ago

We need an immediate impact from this draft. Much like the one we drafted Raji and traded for Clay. We need to draft for some need this year. When you are building up, gotta always draft best player available. But in the first few rounds THIS year we need to draft for need..Defense then OL and then after that we can focus on best player available, we have had success with lower round draft picks too.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 




Eh, drafting for need will more often than not end up in busts. A GM has to largely draft BPA unless of course BPA and need are almost one and the same. If a team has too many elite players, some type of trade can likely be pulled off for a proven player, or just improve the team by allowing the better players to take over for average or serviceable players. If one is attempting to specifically fill a need, it should likely be done via free agency.

One way to "draft for need" I suppose is by trading up and getting a guy that absolutely fills the hole and is incredibly talented. That's risky to start trading away picks, but it could be effective. Perhaps, as you stated, we will see something like that again this year. Or ever better, some type of magic trade for Flynn/Finley/James Jones. It should be an interesting season. I expect to be in serious contention for the super bowl next season.

Wouldn't JJ Watt look nice in green and gold? heh heh.
zombieslayer
12 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



Let's not forget the 2009 draft when πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή grabbed 2 first rounders, with the expectations that both would be studs. One of them will be a perennial Pro Bowler (CM3) and the other is pretty good (but unfortunately overrated).

You CAN get guys with immediate impact from drafts. Plus, let's not rule out πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή making a trade.

So the question I have for you is purely hypothetical. Let's say YOU are Ted, and another team wants Finley. They offer a studly defender for Finley. Do you pull the trigger?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ή πŸ‡²πŸ‡² πŸ‡¦πŸ‡·
Rios39
12 years ago

Eh, drafting for need will more often than not end up in busts. A GM has to largely draft BPA unless of course BPA and need are almost one and the same. If a team has too many elite players, some type of trade can likely be pulled off for a proven player, or just improve the team by allowing the better players to take over for average or serviceable players. If one is attempting to specifically fill a need, it should likely be done via free agency.

One way to "draft for need" I suppose is by trading up and getting a guy that absolutely fills the hole and is incredibly talented. That's risky to start trading away picks, but it could be effective. Perhaps, as you stated, we will see something like that again this year. Or ever better, some type of magic trade for Flynn/Finley/James Jones. It should be an interesting season. I expect to be in serious contention for the super bowl next season.

Wouldn't JJ Watt look nice in green and gold? heh heh.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



Well I don't we can go in and say "Ok we need a LB, a DE, a safety, a CB and draft 1-4 rounds like that. But I think you draft the best defensive player that would fit our scheme and make an impact right away. LB, DE whatever... I don't really see a CB as a first round pick unless he's crazy good.

After the 2nd round you get into a situation of needing best player available no matter what position.
blank
DakotaT
12 years ago
You move Wood to safety with Burnett, Davon House gets moved up to nickel corner. You use the first and second picks on either an OLB or DE. Always use your free agent money for your own players first, so we sign up Finley a keep the offense in tact. I doubt Mario Williams is an option for Green Bay, but our Dline does need some restocking. But priority number one has to be finding Clay's bookend, cause we can't play this defense without that player.
UserPostedImage
porky88
12 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 


The Packers are not making a splash in free agency unless somebody actually wants to play in Green Bay for a lesser price. That probably won't happen, so I agree that bringing back Finley is probably the biggest move the Packers will make in terms of free agency.

However, I disagree with the Packers not drafting for impact in the draft. They constantly grab rookies and plug them in as starters. It hasn't happen as much this year because the team is better than year's past, but I would not be shocked to see two rookies starting on the defensive side of the football next year. Remember, Bryan Bulaga started as a rookie and Morgan Burnett would've started as a rookie if he didn't get hurt. We'll have rookie starters next season, especially with a fairly strong draft.
GoPack1984
12 years ago
I see Finley getting the franchise tag if they don't work out a deal. I don't think there is anyway he isn't a Packer next year. I agree with blueleopard that he opens up routes for the other receivers. If the receivers were having trouble getting open yesterday (and they were), just imagine how hard it will be for them with no Finley. He's too valuable to let go.
blank
Rios39
12 years ago
Finleys latest Tweet while out to the movies.


JermichaelF88 Jermichael Finley
Damn I just dropped the popcorn. Lol
4 minutes ago
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Jets released K Riley Patterson and signed K Anders Carlson to the practice squad.
wpr (4h) : Thanks guys
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Happy Birthday wpr!
Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Anders Carlson ... released by 49ers
dfosterf (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday!😊😊😊
wpr (7-Nov) : Thanks Kevin.
Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday, Wayne! πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚πŸ₯³
beast (7-Nov) : Edge Rushers is the same... it's not the 4-3 vs 3-4 change, it's the Hafley's version of the 4-3... as all 32 teams are actually 4-2
Zero2Cool (6-Nov) : OLB to DE and player requests trade. Yet folks say they are same.
beast (5-Nov) : In other news, the Green Bay Packers have signed Zero2Cool to update their website πŸ˜‹ jk
beast (5-Nov) : Might just re-sign the kicker we got
beast (5-Nov) : Are there any kickers worth drafting next year?
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Preston Smith for Malik Willis
Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Getting a 7th rounder from the Stillers
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : At least we get 7th round pick now!! HELLO NEW KICKER
Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Steelers getting a premier lockdown corner!
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Packers are trading edge rusher Preston Smith to the Pittsburgh Steelers, per sources.
Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Preston Smith traded to the Steelers!!!!
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : CB Marshon Lattimore to Commanders
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Bears are sending RB Khalil Herbert to the Bengals, per sources.
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : ZaDarius Smith continues his "north" tour.
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Let the Chiefs trade a 5th for him
Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Nearing 30, large contract, nope.
Martha Careful (5-Nov) : any interest in Marshon Lattimore?
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : What does NFL do if they're over cap?
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : They've been able to constantly push it out through extensions, void years etc but they're in the hole by 72 million next year I believe
hardrocker950 (4-Nov) : Seems the Saints are always in cap hell
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Saints HC job is not an envious one; gonna be in cap hell for 3 years
Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : Dennis Allen has now been fired twice mid-season with Derek Carr as his starting QB
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Kuhn let go
beast (4-Nov) : I wonder if the Packers would have any interest in Z. Smith, probably not
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Shefter says Browns and Lions will figure out how to get a deal done for Za'Darius Smith..
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Packers are more likely to have 1,000 yard rusher than 4,000 yard passer
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : It's raining hard.
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : Packers inactives vs. Lions: CB Jaire Alexander S Evan Williams C Josh Myers Non-injury inactives: WR Malik Heath OL Travis Glover DE Bren
packerfanoutwest (3-Nov) : Malik Willis: My focus is helping the Packers win, not proving I can start elsewhere. But he could
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : I had Texans, but the loss of another WR flipped me
wpr (1-Nov) : I thought about taking the Jets but they've been a disaster. Losing to the Pats last week
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : Surprised more didn't pick Jets in Pick'em.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

18h / Around The NFL / beast

6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

5-Nov / GameDay Threads / Cheesey

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-Nov / Around The NFL / wpr

Headlines
Copyright Β© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comβ„’. All Rights Reserved.