zombieslayer
13 years ago
Some of you seem to think it's the end of the world if Finley doesn't come back.

Let's set the record straight. We won the SB without him.

With Finley out of the line-up, 🇦🇷 spreads the ball around more. He doesn't focus so much on Finley. Our O last year wasn't as good points wise, but it stayed on the field. It was still an elite O. It just wasn't the #1 O.

The focus on the off season needs to be on D, not O. I was wrong this year to think that the O could have carried this team all the way. I see it now.

D needs to be the #1 priority. If Finley wants too much money, let him walk. We'll need to spend that $$$ on D.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
blueleopard
13 years ago

Some of you seem to think it's the end of the world if Finley doesn't come back.

Let's set the record straight. We won the SB without him.

With Finley out of the line-up, 🇦🇷 spreads the ball around more. He doesn't focus so much on Finley. Our O last year wasn't as good points wise, but it stayed on the field. It was still an elite O. It just wasn't the #1 O.

The focus on the off season needs to be on D, not O. I was wrong this year to think that the O could have carried this team all the way. I see it now.

D needs to be the #1 priority. If Finley wants too much money, let him walk. We'll need to spend that $$$ on D.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
Rios39
13 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 




We need an immediate impact from this draft. Much like the one we drafted Raji and traded for Clay. We need to draft for some need this year. When you are building up, gotta always draft best player available. But in the first few rounds THIS year we need to draft for need..Defense then OL and then after that we can focus on best player available, we have had success with lower round draft picks too.
blank
DoddPower
13 years ago

We need an immediate impact from this draft. Much like the one we drafted Raji and traded for Clay. We need to draft for some need this year. When you are building up, gotta always draft best player available. But in the first few rounds THIS year we need to draft for need..Defense then OL and then after that we can focus on best player available, we have had success with lower round draft picks too.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 




Eh, drafting for need will more often than not end up in busts. A GM has to largely draft BPA unless of course BPA and need are almost one and the same. If a team has too many elite players, some type of trade can likely be pulled off for a proven player, or just improve the team by allowing the better players to take over for average or serviceable players. If one is attempting to specifically fill a need, it should likely be done via free agency.

One way to "draft for need" I suppose is by trading up and getting a guy that absolutely fills the hole and is incredibly talented. That's risky to start trading away picks, but it could be effective. Perhaps, as you stated, we will see something like that again this year. Or ever better, some type of magic trade for Flynn/Finley/James Jones. It should be an interesting season. I expect to be in serious contention for the super bowl next season.

Wouldn't JJ Watt look nice in green and gold? heh heh.
zombieslayer
13 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



Let's not forget the 2009 draft when 🇹🇹 grabbed 2 first rounders, with the expectations that both would be studs. One of them will be a perennial Pro Bowler (CM3) and the other is pretty good (but unfortunately overrated).

You CAN get guys with immediate impact from drafts. Plus, let's not rule out 🇹🇹 making a trade.

So the question I have for you is purely hypothetical. Let's say YOU are Ted, and another team wants Finley. They offer a studly defender for Finley. Do you pull the trigger?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rios39
13 years ago

Eh, drafting for need will more often than not end up in busts. A GM has to largely draft BPA unless of course BPA and need are almost one and the same. If a team has too many elite players, some type of trade can likely be pulled off for a proven player, or just improve the team by allowing the better players to take over for average or serviceable players. If one is attempting to specifically fill a need, it should likely be done via free agency.

One way to "draft for need" I suppose is by trading up and getting a guy that absolutely fills the hole and is incredibly talented. That's risky to start trading away picks, but it could be effective. Perhaps, as you stated, we will see something like that again this year. Or ever better, some type of magic trade for Flynn/Finley/James Jones. It should be an interesting season. I expect to be in serious contention for the super bowl next season.

Wouldn't JJ Watt look nice in green and gold? heh heh.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



Well I don't we can go in and say "Ok we need a LB, a DE, a safety, a CB and draft 1-4 rounds like that. But I think you draft the best defensive player that would fit our scheme and make an impact right away. LB, DE whatever... I don't really see a CB as a first round pick unless he's crazy good.

After the 2nd round you get into a situation of needing best player available no matter what position.
blank
DakotaT
13 years ago
You move Wood to safety with Burnett, Davon House gets moved up to nickel corner. You use the first and second picks on either an OLB or DE. Always use your free agent money for your own players first, so we sign up Finley a keep the offense in tact. I doubt Mario Williams is an option for Green Bay, but our Dline does need some restocking. But priority number one has to be finding Clay's bookend, cause we can't play this defense without that player.
UserPostedImage
porky88
13 years ago

We're not gonna spend $$$ on anything.

Everybody here knows that Ted builds around the draft. We're a good team. We're picking in the bottom 10. Those guys don't make a lot of money, especially in this post-lockout era where there are no more $50 mil guarantees.

Ted isn't going to draft with the expectation of his players making an immediate impact. So if we're going to invest on anything, it's the strength of this team.

I could be wrong and Ted might sign Mario Williams, but I'm not going to rely on that. And I could be wrong. After all, Bill Belichick built around the draft too... and then all of a sudden there was that one year where he signed Jason Taylor, Wes Welker, traded for Randy Moss, and all sorts of aggressive stuff; it's not out of the question.

If we get rid of Finley and spend money on places worth spending... fine. But if we get rid of Finley only to go about the same shit every year drafting players who won't be starters for another 3 years, then I'd be frustrated.

The window of opportunity is open NOW.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 


The Packers are not making a splash in free agency unless somebody actually wants to play in Green Bay for a lesser price. That probably won't happen, so I agree that bringing back Finley is probably the biggest move the Packers will make in terms of free agency.

However, I disagree with the Packers not drafting for impact in the draft. They constantly grab rookies and plug them in as starters. It hasn't happen as much this year because the team is better than year's past, but I would not be shocked to see two rookies starting on the defensive side of the football next year. Remember, Bryan Bulaga started as a rookie and Morgan Burnett would've started as a rookie if he didn't get hurt. We'll have rookie starters next season, especially with a fairly strong draft.
GoPack1984
13 years ago
I see Finley getting the franchise tag if they don't work out a deal. I don't think there is anyway he isn't a Packer next year. I agree with blueleopard that he opens up routes for the other receivers. If the receivers were having trouble getting open yesterday (and they were), just imagine how hard it will be for them with no Finley. He's too valuable to let go.
blank
Rios39
13 years ago
Finleys latest Tweet while out to the movies.


JermichaelF88 Jermichael Finley
Damn I just dropped the popcorn. Lol
4 minutes ago
blank
Fan Shout
dfosterf (8h) : I have some doubt about all that
dfosterf (8h) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.