I think that having a top returner is completely over-rated. If you have a terrible returner, that will hurt you, but I just think the importance people place on having one of those top guys is way over the top.
"dhazer" wrote:
I'm not so sure here Bozz, perfect example; look at the Bears. Hester as a returner they make the Super Bowl after that game they take him off returns and bam not even the playoffs. Then this year they finally put him back there and they make the NFC Championship game. If you have a scary return man he doesn't even have to touch the ball for him to make a difference. Look at how many times teams punted away from Hester and the Bears ended up with awesome field position.
It's also something a team has to waste practice time on defending which doesn't hurt.
"bozz_2006" wrote:
??
Hester on punt returns
2006 47 returns, Super Bowl
2007 42 returns, No Playoffs
2008 32 returns, No Playoffs
2009 24 returns, No Playoffs
2010 33 returns, NFC Championship
I really don't see your correlation here. It is more telling to look at their defense though.
2006 3rd Points Allowed, Super Bowl
2007 16th Points Allowed, No Playoffs
2008 16th Points Allowed, No Playoffs
2009 21st Points Allowed, No Playoffs
2010 4th Points Allowed, NFC Championship
Not that having a scary return man doesn't help but it's definitely overrated. There are thousands of returns every year and like 30 some TDs so even with a good returner a TD is not likely to happen. Now on punt returns the difference between Devin Hester (the best punt returner in history) and Tramon Williams (barely even top 20 in average) is only 9 yards. 9 yards for 20 some plays over an entire season is not worth going out of your way for (not that you could hope for a guy to replicate what Hester does even if you DID go out of your way).
The coverage aspects of special teams are far more important than the returner aspects.