Thursday Night Season Opener· Page 3

macbob
Veteran Member

13 years ago

It hasn't always been a playoff team. Miami had not made the playoffs in 2005 but played the Steelers in the opening game 2006.

That said, my bets on the Vikings, with the network hyping Brett Favre's return to Lambeau after once again coming out of retirement...

The game loses interest 5 mins into the 1st quarter with the Packers up 21-0, when CM3 plants B F, breaking every boner in his body... :tongue:

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#22

The Vikings. I want to rub it in to Vikesrule, then say "I told you so" when the Vikings get beaten by 30+ points. Their OL sucks. Formo's in denial.

"vikesrule" wrote:

It is my most fervent wish ZS, that in your next life, you are reincarnated as a Dallas Cowboys cheerleader.
...derail over....carry on.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

It is my most fervent wish, that when we all come back in the next life'; you and Formo come back as my sons so I can beat some sense into you, daily.

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#23

I chose Da Bears.
There will be no games canceled.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#24

It is my most fervent wish, that when we all come back in the next life'; you and Formo come back as my sons so I can beat some sense into you, daily.

"DakotaT" wrote:

Nah. Vikesrule and Formo will be Packer fans in their next lives. God's punished them enough already, especially Formo with his MIL issues. Vikings fan + Formo's MIL = more punishment than even Idi Amin deserves.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

beast
Select Member

13 years ago

#25

So are the Packers playing the Falcons next season? If so I'm sure the NFL would like to keep hyping the performance of Rodgers in that playoff game... and they split record of 1-1 last year...

"Toddy" wrote:

Yeah but in Atlanta. Would have been a great opening matchup if we were playing them at home.

The Packers are playing the Bears, Lions, Vikings, Saints, Bucs, Rams, Broncos and Raiders at home next season. Out of those the Bears and the Saints are the only games worthy of opening night. Would rarther see us play the Saints as it would probably be more high scoring and exciting.

"beast" wrote:

Do bad, I think the Falcons might be an interesting choice.

I don't want to see the Bears at the opener... I prefer it to be a more relaxed game and not as an important game as a division game...

The Raiders might be an interesting choice as well... you know with CB Nnamdi Asomugha following Woodson footsteps and leaving the Raiders and signing with the Packers :thumbleft:

The Rams, Lions, and viklings are undeserving of a prime time game.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:

Seeing as the Lions out muscled and pushed the Packers around the last time they played each other I'm not sure I'd be saying that about the Lions...

The Buccaneers did not make the playoffs and had a good record by playing the NFC West.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:

The Falcons, Saints, Seahawks and Bucs all got help from playing the NFC West and Panthers at least 6 times... and that's half of the NFC playoff teams...

RaiderPride
Senior Member

13 years ago

#26

The AFC teams Denver and Oakland are undeserving.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:

Undeserving?

Oh Yes... Forbid a franchise with such a storied history like the Raiders from having the opportunity to play The Packers in Prime Time.

Every team starts next season tied for first.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#27

The AFC teams Denver and Oakland are undeserving.

"RaiderPride" wrote:

Undeserving?

Oh Yes... Forbid a franchise with such a storied history like the Raiders from having the opportunity to play The Packers in Prime Time.

Every team starts next season tied for first.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:

Why not mention the Bronco's in your rebuttal? Is it because they've won 2 Super Bowls in the last 15 years, which is two more than the Raiders in the same amount of time?

jdlax
Member

13 years ago

#28

"macbob" wrote:

I know the guy apparently was slinging dong shots around, but how many boners can a guy have at once? 😛

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#29

Every team starts next season tied for first.

"RaiderPride" wrote:

Except the Vikings. They are tied for last.

Stevetarded
Registered

13 years ago

#30

Every team starts next season tied for first.

"wpr" wrote:

Except the Vikings. They are tied for last.

"RaiderPride" wrote:

No, the Lions aren't that bad anymore.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (5h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (6h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (13h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS