DakotaT
13 years ago
What's the demographics in Wisconsin? Is it more urban or rural? How many cities other than Milwaukee, Madison, and Green Bay are over 100,000 people. I ask this because Cheesey made a point about Wisconsin being taken back by the Republicans. It seems to me there would be more democrats in Wisconsin.

One of my co-workers and I were arguing about the ramifications of what is going on. He's a big right winger and I told him the GOP went too far with this and it's going to cost them in the next election. We also got into it about other states and their state employees and how so many are in trouble with their budgets and state employees will be taking a big blow to benefits, wages, and jobs just to get closer to balancing books.

ND is running off the chart surpluses and our legislators are using the national theatre against us. We'll still get moderate raises and no hits to benefits this time, but our defined benefit plan needs and infusion of cash, which is where the argument lies on who's responsible. We have been very lucky to have been unscathed by these hard times. VR chalks it up to Fed pork, but I say it's oil revenue.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
13 years ago
@djcubes:

Regarding the video, only shady thing here is that the "officers" won't identify themselves.


As for the rest, it's apparent that this lady's just trying to be a pain in the ass. The last part, about "considering anyone a threat"... Why is that scary in the context provided? Is it scary when everyone that goes into the U.S. Capitol building gets sent through a metal detector? Is it scary that the U.S. Secret Service are TRAINED to identify threats from ANYONE and anything? Why should the DOJ building not be allowed to have security, and if they're allowed to have security, why is it "scary" that one must keep their mind open to the possibility of anybody being a threat?


It's really interesting that you're quick to label people with cameras asking people to take protest signs off of a war memorial as dicks, whereas someone that's being more passive aggressive is simply "not asking good questions". Especially this bit:

Which is exactly my problem with this video. It's completely obvious he's just trying to put a bad face on the all the protesters with this video. If he really cared about the memorial why didn't he just respectfully ask them to take them down and stated his reasons? He didn't have to bring a camera and attack the people that made an ignorant mistake.

"djcubez" wrote:



Your next post in that topic  eases back a little bit but you still do little but attack the person with the camera for trying to record and beef up something that he sees as an injustice. Why is this a bad thing in that scenario but not bad in this scenario, apart from you agreeing more with the politics in this scenario?

As I've said before, the more we condone slimy politics the more slimy politics we'll get. This should be applied to all behavior... If we try to justify bad behavior just because the outcome favors us, all we're doing is making the world one tiny bit worse. Can't we all just try to take the high road and admit that the world's not just about us?
porky88
13 years ago

What's the demographics in Wisconsin? Is it more urban or rural? How many cities other than Milwaukee, Madison, and Green Bay are over 100,000 people. I ask this because Cheesey made a point about Wisconsin being taken back by the Republicans. It seems to me there would be more democrats in Wisconsin.

One of my co-workers and I were arguing about the ramifications of what is going on. He's a big right winger and I told him the GOP went too far with this and it's going to cost them in the next election. We also got into it about other states and their state employees and how so many are in trouble with their budgets and state employees will be taking a big blow to benefits, wages, and jobs just to get closer to balancing books.

ND is running off the chart surpluses and our legislators are using the national theatre against us. We'll still get moderate raises and no hits to benefits this time, but our defined benefit plan needs and infusion of cash, which is where the argument lies on who's responsible. We have been very lucky to have been unscathed by these hard times. VR chalks it up to Fed pork, but I say it's oil revenue.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Wisconsin is pretty much a swing state every year, though it has been trending more blue than red. I know Republicans think 2010 was a turning point for them. It very well could be.

Still, I don't think the Republicans helped themselves in the short-term with their actions. My guess is they'll take hits in 2012. Keep in mind; 2010 was amazing for them. It will be next to impossible to top that, but also because there will be a higher turnout in 2012. Higher turnout favors democrats in elections.

Unions back Democrats in Wisconsin, so the Republicans did hit their biggest political enemy hard with this. It will help them out raise democratic candidates. Theyre going to have to hope their spending is so insurmountable that the democrats fail to compete. That might work, but this also probably motivated union member to get out and vote. Two years is along time though.

Remember, Walkers a new governor, so it is hard to say what the ramifications will be like for him. He is losing the public argument though. I posted the link earlier in the thread, but he is not winning public support. All you have to do is look at Scott Rasmussen's poll. He is a right-wing leaning pollster and he has Walker's disapproval rating above 50%. On any poll, that is an awful number for a newly elected official. On a poll that should favor you, it is downright scary bad.

Lucky for Walker, he still has a full term to go, so he could recover from this. There is talk of recall, but that would take a year and I don't think anything will come from it in the end.
vikesrule
13 years ago

.... We have been very lucky to have been unscathed by these hard times. VR chalks it up to Fed pork, but I say it's oil revenue.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Ah, here we go again my North Dakotan mooching at the trough amigo.

Discounting DC (everyone knows what leeches are there), looky see which of the 50 states is at the head of the Pig Trough...aka #1 welfare state.
Surprise, surprise...

States Receiving Most in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:

1. D.C. ($6.17)
2. North Dakota ($2.03)
3. New Mexico ($1.89)
4. Mississippi ($1.84)
5. Alaska ($1.82)
6. West Virginia ($1.74)


And which states pay for it

States Receiving Least in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:

1. New Jersey ($0.62)
2. Connecticut ($0.64)
3. New Hampshire ($0.68)
4. Nevada ($0.73)
5. Illinois ($0.77)
6. Minnesota ($0.77)
7. Colorado ($0.79)
8. Massachusetts ($0.79)
9. California ($0.81)
10. New York ($0.81)


As far as oil production...shit, Dorothy and Toto's state produces more oil than the mooches in North Dakota.

Oil Production by state

# 1 Alaska: 664,931
# 2 Texas: 392,867
# 3 California: 240,206
# 4 Louisiana: 83,411
# 5 New Mexico: 64,236
# 6 Oklahoma: 62,502
# 7 Wyoming: 51,619
# 8 Kansas: 33,858
# 9 North Dakota: 31,154
# 10 Montana: 24,724


Here is a little Beatles tune for ya DT that reminds me of North Dakotan's penchant for.....well....you know....

[youtube]sXdKlpBOvs0[/youtube]
DakotaT
13 years ago
VR, your oils stats are outdated as we are now #3 behind Alaska and Texas; but being a Viking fan you are use to inflating anything to try and boost your argument.

As for Pork, I know our scumbag millionaire farmers have perfectly formed trucker hats to the shape of the mailbox. But we now have 2 Republican Congressman in way over their capabilities and I'm expecting the farm subsidy program to take a hit.

Also, I've been getting my ass smoked by everybody and their dog because I stand up against the right and you sit there like a big ole pussy left winger not getting involved. I am not impressed and frankly would not count on you in a brawl my friend.
UserPostedImage
vegOmatic
13 years ago

There is talk of recall, but that would take a year and I don't think anything will come from it in the end.

"porky88" wrote:



They tried a recall on Feingold a few years back and it failed. The only way a recall on Walker will work is if they get help from out of state.

One thing that people don't understand from the TV and newspapers is a percentage of the people at the capital are being bussed in from Illinois and Michigan. Unions have the ability to bring in bodies. They'll have to bring in bodies to canvas for recall signatures and if they do, then Wisconsin is being tainted with outsiders. Also, with the university right there, you have the usual young reactionaries who have yet learn to think for themselves.

In other words, the "movement" isn't as big as it seems. The hard left is up in arms but they'll take any issue they can and blow it out of proportion, same as the hard right toward the left.

I was in Madison last Saturday and saw the demonstrations for myself. If I have time I should write about it. It was eye opening as to what is really happening versus what the newspapers are printing. It's my opinion the mainstream is being suckered by poor reporting by the media.
blank
DakotaT
13 years ago
Veg - you have to be a Wisconsin citizen to stand up to what you believe in? Madison is the setting, big deal. Changing a person's work contract mid or late career is wrong in the public and private sector. When a person who puts in 30 years at a private firm and then gets let go on some bull shit dreamed up by tight asses that don't want to pay his pension - that's wrong. At least a union stands up for that person. Pretty big moral dilemma we have going on no matter how you feel about the size of government.

We can't all be business owners - there has to be a work force. How that work force is treated says a lot about a civilization. The unions were instrumental in modern labor laws. The labor unions are hardly without faults, but even workers in the private sector owe some gratitude to them. And collective bargaining is a major tool in how they go about protecting workers.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
13 years ago

As for the rest, it's apparent that this lady's just trying to be a pain in the ass. The last part, about "considering anyone a threat"... Why is that scary in the context provided? Is it scary when everyone that goes into the U.S. Capitol building gets sent through a metal detector? Is it scary that the U.S. Secret Service are TRAINED to identify threats from ANYONE and anything? Why should the DOJ building not be allowed to have security, and if they're allowed to have security, why is it "scary" that one must keep their mind open to the possibility of anybody being a threat?

"Porforis" wrote:



It's scary because our country is getting taken over by fear. That fear is also causing us to lose our rights. We also have to face higher security measures that tend to be a pain in the ass and don't do squat but make people feel safer. Do you know what rights we lost in the Patriot Act? We lost those rights mainly because "anyone in the country can be considered a threat to national security." Anyone can be and will be considered a terrorist now. And it's the mentality that that "security" personnel has that got us there.

It's really interesting that you're quick to label people with cameras asking people to take protest signs off of a war memorial as dicks, whereas someone that's being more passive aggressive is simply "not asking good questions". Especially this bit:

Which is exactly my problem with this video. It's completely obvious he's just trying to put a bad face on the all the protesters with this video. If he really cared about the memorial why didn't he just respectfully ask them to take them down and stated his reasons? He didn't have to bring a camera and attack the people that made an ignorant mistake.

"Porforis" wrote:



Your next post in that topic  eases back a little bit but you still do little but attack the person with the camera for trying to record and beef up something that he sees as an injustice. Why is this a bad thing in that scenario but not bad in this scenario, apart from you agreeing more with the politics in this scenario?

"djcubez" wrote:



They are two completely different scenarios.

In the one video the guy was antagonizing a group of peaceful protesters over an unfortunate offensive mistake. No one was violating the law here. I can almost guarantee you the protesters would never take action like that if they knew the consequences beforehand. Yet despite that the guy with the camera tries to make them out to be the devil. I definitely had a problem with that. The biggest difference in this case is that everyone here is a citizen and no one is representing an authority or the government.

In this video the woman had a right to be there and some unnamed personnel were telling her to leave. If she has to leave a public place she deserves an explanation and she wasn't getting one. She wasn't harassing a group of people that made a mistake. She was harassing people who were portraying themselves as government or authority figures. Yet by not identifying themselves they wouldn't follow the law as commonly applied to authority figures. It's a giant difference because the people she was antagonizing were knowingly doing something wrong or illegal. You said it yourself:

Regarding the video, only shady thing here is that the "officers" won't identify themselves.

"Porforis" wrote:



The penalty for impersonating a police officer  is a Class 6 Felony, punishable by fines up to $100,000 and/or prison time.

EDIT: After further research it seems that it's only a felony if you commit another crime whilst impersonating an officer. Otherwise I think it's misdemeanor with up to a year in prison. It was hard to find info on this though.



Also if you read my post I didn't give the woman a great endorsement either:

The tactics of the woman recording the video are pretty blatant and she doesn't ask very good questions but the responses by the men are even more interesting.



With all that said I'll completely agree that I'm wishy-washy on politics. The reason is because "new" information is always coming to light. I'll form an opinion and represent it. Then someone will disagree and state their opinion. Instead of immediately clashing I take some time to consider what they said and some of the time I can understand where they're coming from. Then my opinion is reformed bringing in the new logic. Other times I get defensive. It's an information gathering process.

As I've said before, the more we condone slimy politics the more slimy politics we'll get. This should be applied to all behavior... If we try to justify bad behavior just because the outcome favors us, all we're doing is making the world one tiny bit worse. Can't we all just try to take the high road and admit that the world's not just about us?

"Porforis" wrote:



The problem is that the world is about "us" only because everyone lives in their own world. I don't live in the same "world" as you even though we both live on planet Earth. Our perceptions of everything around us help create the "world" that each individual lives in. Not to get all philosophical on you.

To be honest this whole situation has no direct consequence for me. I'm in my last semester at college and about to graduate. I could move out of the country in a few months for all I care. The tuition hikes, the collective bargaining cancellation, the pension lowering, etc., none of this affects me. However I hate to see people crushed this bad for no apparent reason. I try to use logic most of the time to discern situations and in a few of these scenarios I fail to see the logic. That's what makes me upset. That for no apparent logical reason people are losing their jobs and their rights. And in the cases where I find logic, I find it illogical how it's being practiced.

The thing is I'm from Madison and live in Milwaukee so it's very close to home. I know a lot of people protesting in Madison now. I come from a pretty liberal background even though I try to be as moderate as possible. I see people I know hurting. It bothers me.

I'm not trying to attack you either. You ask reasonable questions. It's just impossible to get people to agree in situations where there's no clear right or wrong answer.
djcubez
13 years ago


One thing that people don't understand from the TV and newspapers is a percentage of the people at the capital are being bussed in from Illinois and Michigan. Unions have the ability to bring in bodies. They'll have to bring in bodies to canvas for recall signatures and if they do, then Wisconsin is being tainted with outsiders. Also, with the university right there, you have the usual young reactionaries who have yet learn to think for themselves.

"vegOmatic" wrote:



I don't understand why you used the word "tainted." This isn't a border war here. Like DakotaT said Madison just happens to be the setting for a struggle that's happening nationwide. In numerous other states they're attempting to push forward bills with similar union-busting stipulations. I also happen to know people from Madison that are protesting. It's like you're trying to make it seem that no one in Wisconsin is actually against this bill which is far from the truth.

Also I don't know if I should take offense to your "young reactionaries" quip. I happen to be a similar age to a lot of those young people but I'm pretty sure I can think for myself. However there's black sheep in every group so I don't doubt that there are some college-aged protesters that don't know exactly what's going on. But at least they want to do something about it lol.

In other words, the "movement" isn't as big as it seems.



I think the movement is as big as it seems. I can't log onto any social networking site without seeing a post or status related to this issue. It's the biggest issue Wisconsin has had in my life.

The hard left is up in arms but they'll take any issue they can and blow it out of proportion, same as the hard right toward the left.



Finally something we can agree on.

I was in Madison last Saturday and saw the demonstrations for myself. If I have time I should write about it. It was eye opening as to what is really happening versus what the newspapers are printing. It's my opinion the mainstream is being suckered by poor reporting by the media.



The bolded part I agree with. But it's in more ways than one. All the media looks for is a story. They look for controversy. They don't want to cover anything that isn't going to create a stir. I was reading an article the other day about how CNN skipped reporting on a police union that was protesting right in front of them to report on something that would stir up controversy. Let me find that article. Found it .

Yesterday, I personally got to see the media's negligence in action, as a CNN crew ignored a large solidarity protest of police officers to instead wander to the edge of another small gathering and shoot from a distance. At about 5 p.m., a long line of protesters carrying "Deputies for Democracy" and "Cops for Labor" signs loudly made its way around the capitol. The CNN news crew literally did not even acknowledge the demonstrators as they marched past, American flag and all.

About 20 minutes later, the CNN crew meandered up toward the police line where a small group of protesters were peacefully facing the police guarding the doors. The CNN crew set up 25 feet away and shot, at best, three minutes of video, and then turned around and went back to their trucks, 200 yards away across the street, by all the other media trucks.



There's a lot more in the article with pictures.
Porforis
13 years ago

It's scary because our country is getting taken over by fear. That fear is also causing us to lose our rights. We also have to face higher security measures that tend to be a pain in the ass and don't do squat but make people feel safer. Do you know what rights we lost in the Patriot Act? We lost those rights mainly because "anyone in the country can be considered a threat to national security." Anyone can be and will be considered a terrorist now. And it's the mentality that that "security" personnel has that got us there.

"djcubez" wrote:



Why bring up the patriot act now? We're in agreement as far as that goes, but the notion that this lady was exposed to security above and beyond what's been in place for 100+ years is pretty silly. Doesn't really have anything to do with this video as far as I see it.

In the one video the guy was antagonizing a group of peaceful protesters over an unfortunate offensive mistake. No one was violating the law here.

"djcubez" wrote:



Hey, surely you'll err on the side of caution when it comes to assuming good intentions in other videos with clear bias. And this lady was violating the law if she was illegally parked here. Obviously an incredibly minor offense, but hey.

I can almost guarantee you the protesters would never take action like that if they knew the consequences beforehand. Yet despite that the guy with the camera tries to make them out to be the devil.

"djcubez" wrote:



Why's that? Do you know these people? Or are you just deciding to not condemn them because we don't have all the facts? Again, clearly you'd take the same stance in other videos if the political spectrum involved were reversed.

I definitely had a problem with that. The biggest difference in this case is that everyone here is a citizen and no one is representing an authority or the government.

"djcubez" wrote:



I'll agree with you on this one.

In this video the woman had a right to be there and some unnamed personnel were telling her to leave.

"djcubez" wrote:



Again, you're siding with the lady here despite having no evidence to back up her side of the story and no evidence to suggest that this was in fact a free, public parking ramp and parking spot. Or that it was a private spot she paid for.

If she has to leave a public place she deserves an explanation and she wasn't getting one. She wasn't harassing a group of people that made a mistake. She was harassing people who were portraying themselves as government or authority figures. Yet by not identifying themselves they wouldn't follow the law as commonly applied to authority figures.

"djcubez" wrote:



Again, I'll grant you that their behavior was not perfect at all, but again we don't have all the facts about who they were, what they were doing there, or the events leading up to this confrontation. But again, it seems like you're instantly siding with her on the count that this was in fact a public parking area, or she was not aware that it was not a public parking area.

Also if you read my post I didn't give the woman a great endorsement either:

The tactics of the woman recording the video are pretty blatant and she doesn't ask very good questions but the responses by the men are even more interesting.

"djcubez" wrote:



I'm sorry, but all you're doing is shrugging your shoulders and saying "hey, she's not perfect". You're taking a much, much more aggressive and combative stance towards the other parties involved despite all my above points. Sure, you're not endorsing her but if you agree with her intentions (to show the public shady activities going on) I can't see how your statement can't be interpreted as a "hey, what are you gonna do?" sort of thing.

With all that said I'll completely agree that I'm wishy-washy on politics. The reason is because "new" information is always coming to light. I'll form an opinion and represent it. Then someone will disagree and state their opinion. Instead of immediately clashing I take some time to consider what they said and some of the time I can understand where they're coming from. Then my opinion is reformed bringing in the new logic. Other times I get defensive. It's an information gathering process.

"djcubez" wrote:



I do appreciate you explaining your thought process, I'm of the opinion that the world is a bad place primarily because of people's inability or unwillingness to see things from others' points of view. You can certainly still disagree with someone after trying to see things from their perspective, but if you refuse to even entertain their side of things, that's an awfully self-centered way of thinking. As much as I often hate to admit it, my opinion is not always right. It's simply my opinion.

The problem is that the world is about "us" only because everyone lives in their own world. I don't live in the same "world" as you even though we both live on planet Earth. Our perceptions of everything around us help create the "world" that each individual lives in. Not to get all philosophical on you.

To be honest this whole situation has no direct consequence for me. I'm in my last semester at college and about to graduate. I could move out of the country in a few months for all I care. The tuition hikes, the collective bargaining cancellation, the pension lowering, etc., none of this affects me. However I hate to see people crushed this bad for no apparent reason. I try to use logic most of the time to discern situations and in a few of these scenarios I fail to see the logic. That's what makes me upset. That for no apparent logical reason people are losing their jobs and their rights. And in the cases where I find logic, I find it illogical how it's being practiced.

The thing is I'm from Madison and live in Milwaukee so it's very close to home. I know a lot of people protesting in Madison now. I come from a pretty liberal background even though I try to be as moderate as possible. I see people I know hurting. It bothers me.

I'm not trying to attack you either. You ask reasonable questions. It's just impossible to get people to agree in situations where there's no clear right or wrong answer.

"djcubez" wrote:



This sort of thing is why I still bother debating politics. When I'm singling you out like I did above, it's not a personal attack, just an attempt to try to get you to spot what I perceive to be a series of errors in thinking. I do really appreciate you responding to me and while I'm sure we'll never agree with eachother, at least we've explained our viewpoints without resorting to accusations and personal attacks. Who knows, maybe the next time we look at a news story we'll see things a little bit differently. ;)

A little bit of an off-note, I spent 21 of my 24 years in Wisconsin, my first 18 in La Crosse and years 19-21 in Milwaukee. In fact, I still work for a company based in Milwaukee even though I now live in Indiana.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (1h) : MarShawn Lloyd has appendicitis according to Matt LaFleur.
    Zero2Cool (14-Nov) : He probably plays DB.
    Zero2Cool (14-Nov) : I don't even know who that Don is
    packerfanoutwest (14-Nov) : What position does Lemon play ?
    dfosterf (14-Nov) : I read this am that Don Lemon quit x, so there's that
    Zero2Cool (13-Nov) : Seems some are flocking to BlueSky and leaving Tweeter. I wonder if BlueSky allows embeded lists
    beast (12-Nov) : He's a review guy
    Zero2Cool (12-Nov) : Jordy Nelson is still in the NFL.
    Zero2Cool (11-Nov) : Ok, will do.
    wpr (11-Nov) : Kevin, donate it to a local food pantry or whatever she wants to do with it. Thanks
    wpr (11-Nov) : Kevin,
    Zero2Cool (11-Nov) : Wayne, got your girl scout order.
    dfosterf (11-Nov) : I believe Zero was being sarcastic
    dfosterf (11-Nov) : Due to that rookie kicker Jake Bates that Zero said "he didn't want anyway". 58 yarder to tie the game, 52 yarder to win it. In fairness,
    Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Lions escape with a win
    Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : and now Goff looking better
    Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Goff with ANOTHER INT
    Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : and now Stroud throwing INTs
    Mucky Tundra (11-Nov) : Goff having an ATROCIOUS game
    wpr (11-Nov) : Happy birthday Corps. Ever faithful. Thanks dfosterf.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Nov) : stiff armed by Baker Mayfield for about 5-7 yards and still managed to get a pass off
    Mucky Tundra (10-Nov) : Nick Bosa
    wpr (8-Nov) : Jets are Packers (L)East
    Zero2Cool (8-Nov) : Jets released K Riley Patterson and signed K Anders Carlson to the practice squad.
    wpr (8-Nov) : Thanks guys
    Mucky Tundra (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday wpr!
    Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Anders Carlson ... released by 49ers
    dfosterf (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday!😊😊😊
    wpr (7-Nov) : Thanks Kevin.
    Zero2Cool (7-Nov) : Happy Birthday, Wayne! 🎉🎂🥳
    beast (7-Nov) : Edge Rushers is the same... it's not the 4-3 vs 3-4 change, it's the Hafley's version of the 4-3... as all 32 teams are actually 4-2
    Zero2Cool (6-Nov) : OLB to DE and player requests trade. Yet folks say they are same.
    beast (5-Nov) : In other news, the Green Bay Packers have signed Zero2Cool to update their website 😋 jk
    beast (5-Nov) : Might just re-sign the kicker we got
    beast (5-Nov) : Are there any kickers worth drafting next year?
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Preston Smith for Malik Willis
    Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Getting a 7th rounder from the Stillers
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : At least we get 7th round pick now!! HELLO NEW KICKER
    Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Steelers getting a premier lockdown corner!
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Packers are trading edge rusher Preston Smith to the Pittsburgh Steelers, per sources.
    Mucky Tundra (5-Nov) : Preston Smith traded to the Steelers!!!!
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : CB Marshon Lattimore to Commanders
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Bears are sending RB Khalil Herbert to the Bengals, per sources.
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : ZaDarius Smith continues his "north" tour.
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Let the Chiefs trade a 5th for him
    Zero2Cool (5-Nov) : Nearing 30, large contract, nope.
    Martha Careful (5-Nov) : any interest in Marshon Lattimore?
    Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : What does NFL do if they're over cap?
    Mucky Tundra (4-Nov) : They've been able to constantly push it out through extensions, void years etc but they're in the hole by 72 million next year I believe
    hardrocker950 (4-Nov) : Seems the Saints are always in cap hell
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    20m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    13-Nov / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    12-Nov / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    11-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    11-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    9-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / joepacker

    8-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    6-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.