DakotaT
14 years ago
What's the demographics in Wisconsin? Is it more urban or rural? How many cities other than Milwaukee, Madison, and Green Bay are over 100,000 people. I ask this because Cheesey made a point about Wisconsin being taken back by the Republicans. It seems to me there would be more democrats in Wisconsin.

One of my co-workers and I were arguing about the ramifications of what is going on. He's a big right winger and I told him the GOP went too far with this and it's going to cost them in the next election. We also got into it about other states and their state employees and how so many are in trouble with their budgets and state employees will be taking a big blow to benefits, wages, and jobs just to get closer to balancing books.

ND is running off the chart surpluses and our legislators are using the national theatre against us. We'll still get moderate raises and no hits to benefits this time, but our defined benefit plan needs and infusion of cash, which is where the argument lies on who's responsible. We have been very lucky to have been unscathed by these hard times. VR chalks it up to Fed pork, but I say it's oil revenue.
UserPostedImage
Porforis
14 years ago
@djcubes:

Regarding the video, only shady thing here is that the "officers" won't identify themselves.


As for the rest, it's apparent that this lady's just trying to be a pain in the ass. The last part, about "considering anyone a threat"... Why is that scary in the context provided? Is it scary when everyone that goes into the U.S. Capitol building gets sent through a metal detector? Is it scary that the U.S. Secret Service are TRAINED to identify threats from ANYONE and anything? Why should the DOJ building not be allowed to have security, and if they're allowed to have security, why is it "scary" that one must keep their mind open to the possibility of anybody being a threat?


It's really interesting that you're quick to label people with cameras asking people to take protest signs off of a war memorial as dicks, whereas someone that's being more passive aggressive is simply "not asking good questions". Especially this bit:

Which is exactly my problem with this video. It's completely obvious he's just trying to put a bad face on the all the protesters with this video. If he really cared about the memorial why didn't he just respectfully ask them to take them down and stated his reasons? He didn't have to bring a camera and attack the people that made an ignorant mistake.

"djcubez" wrote:



Your next post in that topic  eases back a little bit but you still do little but attack the person with the camera for trying to record and beef up something that he sees as an injustice. Why is this a bad thing in that scenario but not bad in this scenario, apart from you agreeing more with the politics in this scenario?

As I've said before, the more we condone slimy politics the more slimy politics we'll get. This should be applied to all behavior... If we try to justify bad behavior just because the outcome favors us, all we're doing is making the world one tiny bit worse. Can't we all just try to take the high road and admit that the world's not just about us?
porky88
14 years ago

What's the demographics in Wisconsin? Is it more urban or rural? How many cities other than Milwaukee, Madison, and Green Bay are over 100,000 people. I ask this because Cheesey made a point about Wisconsin being taken back by the Republicans. It seems to me there would be more democrats in Wisconsin.

One of my co-workers and I were arguing about the ramifications of what is going on. He's a big right winger and I told him the GOP went too far with this and it's going to cost them in the next election. We also got into it about other states and their state employees and how so many are in trouble with their budgets and state employees will be taking a big blow to benefits, wages, and jobs just to get closer to balancing books.

ND is running off the chart surpluses and our legislators are using the national theatre against us. We'll still get moderate raises and no hits to benefits this time, but our defined benefit plan needs and infusion of cash, which is where the argument lies on who's responsible. We have been very lucky to have been unscathed by these hard times. VR chalks it up to Fed pork, but I say it's oil revenue.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Wisconsin is pretty much a swing state every year, though it has been trending more blue than red. I know Republicans think 2010 was a turning point for them. It very well could be.

Still, I don't think the Republicans helped themselves in the short-term with their actions. My guess is they'll take hits in 2012. Keep in mind; 2010 was amazing for them. It will be next to impossible to top that, but also because there will be a higher turnout in 2012. Higher turnout favors democrats in elections.

Unions back Democrats in Wisconsin, so the Republicans did hit their biggest political enemy hard with this. It will help them out raise democratic candidates. Theyre going to have to hope their spending is so insurmountable that the democrats fail to compete. That might work, but this also probably motivated union member to get out and vote. Two years is along time though.

Remember, Walkers a new governor, so it is hard to say what the ramifications will be like for him. He is losing the public argument though. I posted the link earlier in the thread, but he is not winning public support. All you have to do is look at Scott Rasmussen's poll. He is a right-wing leaning pollster and he has Walker's disapproval rating above 50%. On any poll, that is an awful number for a newly elected official. On a poll that should favor you, it is downright scary bad.

Lucky for Walker, he still has a full term to go, so he could recover from this. There is talk of recall, but that would take a year and I don't think anything will come from it in the end.
vikesrule
14 years ago

.... We have been very lucky to have been unscathed by these hard times. VR chalks it up to Fed pork, but I say it's oil revenue.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Ah, here we go again my North Dakotan mooching at the trough amigo.

Discounting DC (everyone knows what leeches are there), looky see which of the 50 states is at the head of the Pig Trough...aka #1 welfare state.
Surprise, surprise...

States Receiving Most in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:

1. D.C. ($6.17)
2. North Dakota ($2.03)
3. New Mexico ($1.89)
4. Mississippi ($1.84)
5. Alaska ($1.82)
6. West Virginia ($1.74)


And which states pay for it

States Receiving Least in Federal Spending Per Dollar of Federal Taxes Paid:

1. New Jersey ($0.62)
2. Connecticut ($0.64)
3. New Hampshire ($0.68)
4. Nevada ($0.73)
5. Illinois ($0.77)
6. Minnesota ($0.77)
7. Colorado ($0.79)
8. Massachusetts ($0.79)
9. California ($0.81)
10. New York ($0.81)


As far as oil production...shit, Dorothy and Toto's state produces more oil than the mooches in North Dakota.

Oil Production by state

# 1 Alaska: 664,931
# 2 Texas: 392,867
# 3 California: 240,206
# 4 Louisiana: 83,411
# 5 New Mexico: 64,236
# 6 Oklahoma: 62,502
# 7 Wyoming: 51,619
# 8 Kansas: 33,858
# 9 North Dakota: 31,154
# 10 Montana: 24,724


Here is a little Beatles tune for ya DT that reminds me of North Dakotan's penchant for.....well....you know....

[youtube]sXdKlpBOvs0[/youtube]
DakotaT
14 years ago
VR, your oils stats are outdated as we are now #3 behind Alaska and Texas; but being a Viking fan you are use to inflating anything to try and boost your argument.

As for Pork, I know our scumbag millionaire farmers have perfectly formed trucker hats to the shape of the mailbox. But we now have 2 Republican Congressman in way over their capabilities and I'm expecting the farm subsidy program to take a hit.

Also, I've been getting my ass smoked by everybody and their dog because I stand up against the right and you sit there like a big ole pussy left winger not getting involved. I am not impressed and frankly would not count on you in a brawl my friend.
UserPostedImage
vegOmatic
14 years ago

There is talk of recall, but that would take a year and I don't think anything will come from it in the end.

"porky88" wrote:



They tried a recall on Feingold a few years back and it failed. The only way a recall on Walker will work is if they get help from out of state.

One thing that people don't understand from the TV and newspapers is a percentage of the people at the capital are being bussed in from Illinois and Michigan. Unions have the ability to bring in bodies. They'll have to bring in bodies to canvas for recall signatures and if they do, then Wisconsin is being tainted with outsiders. Also, with the university right there, you have the usual young reactionaries who have yet learn to think for themselves.

In other words, the "movement" isn't as big as it seems. The hard left is up in arms but they'll take any issue they can and blow it out of proportion, same as the hard right toward the left.

I was in Madison last Saturday and saw the demonstrations for myself. If I have time I should write about it. It was eye opening as to what is really happening versus what the newspapers are printing. It's my opinion the mainstream is being suckered by poor reporting by the media.
blank
DakotaT
14 years ago
Veg - you have to be a Wisconsin citizen to stand up to what you believe in? Madison is the setting, big deal. Changing a person's work contract mid or late career is wrong in the public and private sector. When a person who puts in 30 years at a private firm and then gets let go on some bull shit dreamed up by tight asses that don't want to pay his pension - that's wrong. At least a union stands up for that person. Pretty big moral dilemma we have going on no matter how you feel about the size of government.

We can't all be business owners - there has to be a work force. How that work force is treated says a lot about a civilization. The unions were instrumental in modern labor laws. The labor unions are hardly without faults, but even workers in the private sector owe some gratitude to them. And collective bargaining is a major tool in how they go about protecting workers.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago

As for the rest, it's apparent that this lady's just trying to be a pain in the ass. The last part, about "considering anyone a threat"... Why is that scary in the context provided? Is it scary when everyone that goes into the U.S. Capitol building gets sent through a metal detector? Is it scary that the U.S. Secret Service are TRAINED to identify threats from ANYONE and anything? Why should the DOJ building not be allowed to have security, and if they're allowed to have security, why is it "scary" that one must keep their mind open to the possibility of anybody being a threat?

"Porforis" wrote:



It's scary because our country is getting taken over by fear. That fear is also causing us to lose our rights. We also have to face higher security measures that tend to be a pain in the ass and don't do squat but make people feel safer. Do you know what rights we lost in the Patriot Act? We lost those rights mainly because "anyone in the country can be considered a threat to national security." Anyone can be and will be considered a terrorist now. And it's the mentality that that "security" personnel has that got us there.

It's really interesting that you're quick to label people with cameras asking people to take protest signs off of a war memorial as dicks, whereas someone that's being more passive aggressive is simply "not asking good questions". Especially this bit:

Which is exactly my problem with this video. It's completely obvious he's just trying to put a bad face on the all the protesters with this video. If he really cared about the memorial why didn't he just respectfully ask them to take them down and stated his reasons? He didn't have to bring a camera and attack the people that made an ignorant mistake.

"Porforis" wrote:



Your next post in that topic  eases back a little bit but you still do little but attack the person with the camera for trying to record and beef up something that he sees as an injustice. Why is this a bad thing in that scenario but not bad in this scenario, apart from you agreeing more with the politics in this scenario?

"djcubez" wrote:



They are two completely different scenarios.

In the one video the guy was antagonizing a group of peaceful protesters over an unfortunate offensive mistake. No one was violating the law here. I can almost guarantee you the protesters would never take action like that if they knew the consequences beforehand. Yet despite that the guy with the camera tries to make them out to be the devil. I definitely had a problem with that. The biggest difference in this case is that everyone here is a citizen and no one is representing an authority or the government.

In this video the woman had a right to be there and some unnamed personnel were telling her to leave. If she has to leave a public place she deserves an explanation and she wasn't getting one. She wasn't harassing a group of people that made a mistake. She was harassing people who were portraying themselves as government or authority figures. Yet by not identifying themselves they wouldn't follow the law as commonly applied to authority figures. It's a giant difference because the people she was antagonizing were knowingly doing something wrong or illegal. You said it yourself:

Regarding the video, only shady thing here is that the "officers" won't identify themselves.

"Porforis" wrote:



The penalty for impersonating a police officer  is a Class 6 Felony, punishable by fines up to $100,000 and/or prison time.

EDIT: After further research it seems that it's only a felony if you commit another crime whilst impersonating an officer. Otherwise I think it's misdemeanor with up to a year in prison. It was hard to find info on this though.



Also if you read my post I didn't give the woman a great endorsement either:

The tactics of the woman recording the video are pretty blatant and she doesn't ask very good questions but the responses by the men are even more interesting.



With all that said I'll completely agree that I'm wishy-washy on politics. The reason is because "new" information is always coming to light. I'll form an opinion and represent it. Then someone will disagree and state their opinion. Instead of immediately clashing I take some time to consider what they said and some of the time I can understand where they're coming from. Then my opinion is reformed bringing in the new logic. Other times I get defensive. It's an information gathering process.

As I've said before, the more we condone slimy politics the more slimy politics we'll get. This should be applied to all behavior... If we try to justify bad behavior just because the outcome favors us, all we're doing is making the world one tiny bit worse. Can't we all just try to take the high road and admit that the world's not just about us?

"Porforis" wrote:



The problem is that the world is about "us" only because everyone lives in their own world. I don't live in the same "world" as you even though we both live on planet Earth. Our perceptions of everything around us help create the "world" that each individual lives in. Not to get all philosophical on you.

To be honest this whole situation has no direct consequence for me. I'm in my last semester at college and about to graduate. I could move out of the country in a few months for all I care. The tuition hikes, the collective bargaining cancellation, the pension lowering, etc., none of this affects me. However I hate to see people crushed this bad for no apparent reason. I try to use logic most of the time to discern situations and in a few of these scenarios I fail to see the logic. That's what makes me upset. That for no apparent logical reason people are losing their jobs and their rights. And in the cases where I find logic, I find it illogical how it's being practiced.

The thing is I'm from Madison and live in Milwaukee so it's very close to home. I know a lot of people protesting in Madison now. I come from a pretty liberal background even though I try to be as moderate as possible. I see people I know hurting. It bothers me.

I'm not trying to attack you either. You ask reasonable questions. It's just impossible to get people to agree in situations where there's no clear right or wrong answer.
djcubez
14 years ago


One thing that people don't understand from the TV and newspapers is a percentage of the people at the capital are being bussed in from Illinois and Michigan. Unions have the ability to bring in bodies. They'll have to bring in bodies to canvas for recall signatures and if they do, then Wisconsin is being tainted with outsiders. Also, with the university right there, you have the usual young reactionaries who have yet learn to think for themselves.

"vegOmatic" wrote:



I don't understand why you used the word "tainted." This isn't a border war here. Like DakotaT said Madison just happens to be the setting for a struggle that's happening nationwide. In numerous other states they're attempting to push forward bills with similar union-busting stipulations. I also happen to know people from Madison that are protesting. It's like you're trying to make it seem that no one in Wisconsin is actually against this bill which is far from the truth.

Also I don't know if I should take offense to your "young reactionaries" quip. I happen to be a similar age to a lot of those young people but I'm pretty sure I can think for myself. However there's black sheep in every group so I don't doubt that there are some college-aged protesters that don't know exactly what's going on. But at least they want to do something about it lol.

In other words, the "movement" isn't as big as it seems.



I think the movement is as big as it seems. I can't log onto any social networking site without seeing a post or status related to this issue. It's the biggest issue Wisconsin has had in my life.

The hard left is up in arms but they'll take any issue they can and blow it out of proportion, same as the hard right toward the left.



Finally something we can agree on.

I was in Madison last Saturday and saw the demonstrations for myself. If I have time I should write about it. It was eye opening as to what is really happening versus what the newspapers are printing. It's my opinion the mainstream is being suckered by poor reporting by the media.



The bolded part I agree with. But it's in more ways than one. All the media looks for is a story. They look for controversy. They don't want to cover anything that isn't going to create a stir. I was reading an article the other day about how CNN skipped reporting on a police union that was protesting right in front of them to report on something that would stir up controversy. Let me find that article. Found it .

Yesterday, I personally got to see the media's negligence in action, as a CNN crew ignored a large solidarity protest of police officers to instead wander to the edge of another small gathering and shoot from a distance. At about 5 p.m., a long line of protesters carrying "Deputies for Democracy" and "Cops for Labor" signs loudly made its way around the capitol. The CNN news crew literally did not even acknowledge the demonstrators as they marched past, American flag and all.

About 20 minutes later, the CNN crew meandered up toward the police line where a small group of protesters were peacefully facing the police guarding the doors. The CNN crew set up 25 feet away and shot, at best, three minutes of video, and then turned around and went back to their trucks, 200 yards away across the street, by all the other media trucks.



There's a lot more in the article with pictures.
Porforis
14 years ago

It's scary because our country is getting taken over by fear. That fear is also causing us to lose our rights. We also have to face higher security measures that tend to be a pain in the ass and don't do squat but make people feel safer. Do you know what rights we lost in the Patriot Act? We lost those rights mainly because "anyone in the country can be considered a threat to national security." Anyone can be and will be considered a terrorist now. And it's the mentality that that "security" personnel has that got us there.

"djcubez" wrote:



Why bring up the patriot act now? We're in agreement as far as that goes, but the notion that this lady was exposed to security above and beyond what's been in place for 100+ years is pretty silly. Doesn't really have anything to do with this video as far as I see it.

In the one video the guy was antagonizing a group of peaceful protesters over an unfortunate offensive mistake. No one was violating the law here.

"djcubez" wrote:



Hey, surely you'll err on the side of caution when it comes to assuming good intentions in other videos with clear bias. And this lady was violating the law if she was illegally parked here. Obviously an incredibly minor offense, but hey.

I can almost guarantee you the protesters would never take action like that if they knew the consequences beforehand. Yet despite that the guy with the camera tries to make them out to be the devil.

"djcubez" wrote:



Why's that? Do you know these people? Or are you just deciding to not condemn them because we don't have all the facts? Again, clearly you'd take the same stance in other videos if the political spectrum involved were reversed.

I definitely had a problem with that. The biggest difference in this case is that everyone here is a citizen and no one is representing an authority or the government.

"djcubez" wrote:



I'll agree with you on this one.

In this video the woman had a right to be there and some unnamed personnel were telling her to leave.

"djcubez" wrote:



Again, you're siding with the lady here despite having no evidence to back up her side of the story and no evidence to suggest that this was in fact a free, public parking ramp and parking spot. Or that it was a private spot she paid for.

If she has to leave a public place she deserves an explanation and she wasn't getting one. She wasn't harassing a group of people that made a mistake. She was harassing people who were portraying themselves as government or authority figures. Yet by not identifying themselves they wouldn't follow the law as commonly applied to authority figures.

"djcubez" wrote:



Again, I'll grant you that their behavior was not perfect at all, but again we don't have all the facts about who they were, what they were doing there, or the events leading up to this confrontation. But again, it seems like you're instantly siding with her on the count that this was in fact a public parking area, or she was not aware that it was not a public parking area.

Also if you read my post I didn't give the woman a great endorsement either:

The tactics of the woman recording the video are pretty blatant and she doesn't ask very good questions but the responses by the men are even more interesting.

"djcubez" wrote:



I'm sorry, but all you're doing is shrugging your shoulders and saying "hey, she's not perfect". You're taking a much, much more aggressive and combative stance towards the other parties involved despite all my above points. Sure, you're not endorsing her but if you agree with her intentions (to show the public shady activities going on) I can't see how your statement can't be interpreted as a "hey, what are you gonna do?" sort of thing.

With all that said I'll completely agree that I'm wishy-washy on politics. The reason is because "new" information is always coming to light. I'll form an opinion and represent it. Then someone will disagree and state their opinion. Instead of immediately clashing I take some time to consider what they said and some of the time I can understand where they're coming from. Then my opinion is reformed bringing in the new logic. Other times I get defensive. It's an information gathering process.

"djcubez" wrote:



I do appreciate you explaining your thought process, I'm of the opinion that the world is a bad place primarily because of people's inability or unwillingness to see things from others' points of view. You can certainly still disagree with someone after trying to see things from their perspective, but if you refuse to even entertain their side of things, that's an awfully self-centered way of thinking. As much as I often hate to admit it, my opinion is not always right. It's simply my opinion.

The problem is that the world is about "us" only because everyone lives in their own world. I don't live in the same "world" as you even though we both live on planet Earth. Our perceptions of everything around us help create the "world" that each individual lives in. Not to get all philosophical on you.

To be honest this whole situation has no direct consequence for me. I'm in my last semester at college and about to graduate. I could move out of the country in a few months for all I care. The tuition hikes, the collective bargaining cancellation, the pension lowering, etc., none of this affects me. However I hate to see people crushed this bad for no apparent reason. I try to use logic most of the time to discern situations and in a few of these scenarios I fail to see the logic. That's what makes me upset. That for no apparent logical reason people are losing their jobs and their rights. And in the cases where I find logic, I find it illogical how it's being practiced.

The thing is I'm from Madison and live in Milwaukee so it's very close to home. I know a lot of people protesting in Madison now. I come from a pretty liberal background even though I try to be as moderate as possible. I see people I know hurting. It bothers me.

I'm not trying to attack you either. You ask reasonable questions. It's just impossible to get people to agree in situations where there's no clear right or wrong answer.

"djcubez" wrote:



This sort of thing is why I still bother debating politics. When I'm singling you out like I did above, it's not a personal attack, just an attempt to try to get you to spot what I perceive to be a series of errors in thinking. I do really appreciate you responding to me and while I'm sure we'll never agree with eachother, at least we've explained our viewpoints without resorting to accusations and personal attacks. Who knows, maybe the next time we look at a news story we'll see things a little bit differently. ;)

A little bit of an off-note, I spent 21 of my 24 years in Wisconsin, my first 18 in La Crosse and years 19-21 in Milwaukee. In fact, I still work for a company based in Milwaukee even though I now live in Indiana.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6h) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (6h) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.