Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"go.pack.go." wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.
blank
JordyNelson87
14 years ago
Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
longtimefan
14 years ago


Every NFL team has a training staff, and they're all fairly small. If the Packers had like 4 or 5 guys on IR, I bet Barnett would've stayed. This isn't the case. There's 17 players on IR, and you have to add the 53 players already on the team, and the players we have on the Practice Squad. That's more than 75 men the training staff has to take care of, and the injuries that take less time to cure are the ones they tend to first--that way they can get them back on the field.

So you're Nick Barnett, and you know you won't be back until next season, and not only will your teammates not pay much attention to you, but neither will the doctors.

He had to go home.

"blueleopard" wrote:



Mark Tacuh on IR Nov 12th, he has stuck around, seems the staff has time for him?

Nick Oct 15th, since it was a month before Tauch wouldnt the logical reason be that the staff had time for him too??

So your theory that the staff didnt have time is false IMO
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



He has a LOT of off the field issues? Like what? I don't recall him ever getting in trouble off the field.
UserPostedImage
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"go.pack.go." wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.

"go.pack.go." wrote:


He has a LOT of off the field issues? Like what? I don't recall him ever getting in trouble off the field.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

what??!?! You have not heard about the situation with his agent, or should I say agents. I think Wilde mentioned it a lot on the radio last year about how the team was worried about him. Lots of red flags!
blank
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"JordyNelson87" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.
blank
blueleopard
14 years ago


Every NFL team has a training staff, and they're all fairly small. If the Packers had like 4 or 5 guys on IR, I bet Barnett would've stayed. This isn't the case. There's 17 players on IR, and you have to add the 53 players already on the team, and the players we have on the Practice Squad. That's more than 75 men the training staff has to take care of, and the injuries that take less time to cure are the ones they tend to first--that way they can get them back on the field.

So you're Nick Barnett, and you know you won't be back until next season, and not only will your teammates not pay much attention to you, but neither will the doctors.

He had to go home.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Mark Tacuh on IR Nov 12th, he has stuck around, seems the staff has time for him?

Nick Oct 15th, since it was a month before Tauch wouldnt the logical reason be that the staff had time for him too??

So your theory that the staff didnt have time is false IMO

"blueleopard" wrote:



That is probably the worst rebuttal anybody can ever make.

Tauscher? Seriously? You're gonna mention that guy? He went to school in Wisconsin. HE LIVES IN WISCONSIN.

Not to mention his CAREER IS OVER. If my career was over, I'd love to go on free plane rides to watch the Packers from the sideline.

Tauscher is somebody we should've ditched two years ago, and it's pretty obvious that the reason why he's with the Pack is the free plane rides and Packer games.

The training staff literally has no reason to be watching Tauscher. He ain't coming back next year.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
porky88
14 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.

"JordyNelson87" wrote:



If youre talking about raw talent, I dont think there has been a better receiving TE to come around than Jermichael Finley has. His ability exceeds even Tony Gonzalez. All of Finleys problems have to do with off the field actions and work ethic. Durability is also an issue that concerns me, but there are not 10 TEs with better receiving ability or athleticism than Finley. There might be 10 better players because of other variables, which could include work ethic and maturity. In terms of ability, Finley is special.
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"porky88" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



If youre talking about raw talent, I dont think there has been a better receiving TE to come around than Jermichael Finley has. His ability exceeds even Tony Gonzalez. All of Finleys problems have to do with off the field actions and work ethic. Durability is also an issue that concerns me, but there are not 10 TEs with better receiving ability or athleticism than Finley. There might be 10 better players because of other variables, which could include work ethic and maturity. In terms of ability, Finley is special.

"JordyNelson87" wrote:


He said ever....which includes the greats...Winslow, Casper, etc.
blank
Greg C.
14 years ago
Yet another thread with a misleading title. (This one is courtesy of Mike Florio, but maybe we shouldn't just repeat what Florio writes. Rodgers was not asked about the picture and said nothing about the picture, and even the players who stuck with the team were not originally going to be in the picture, so the two things are not connected except in Florio's fevered imagination.)

Anyway, I'm not sure why Aaron weighed in on this issue of players on IR. He has a good touch with the media, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now. Maybe he needed to say what he said in order to assert his leadership to his teammates or something. But you would think that at this point he would want to throw a wet blanket over anything that has to do with the players on IR, whether or not it has to do with Picturegate. One thing that seems likely is that Nick Barnett has sealed his fate and will not be invited back next year. Too bad. I used to like him.
blank
Fan Shout
dfosterf (5h) : Taylor Elgersma is going to be very hard to hide.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Matthew Golden=DAWG (so load the wagons!!) !!!!!
dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4m / Around The NFL / dhazer

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isaiah

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.