Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"go.pack.go." wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.
blank
JordyNelson87
14 years ago
Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
longtimefan
14 years ago


Every NFL team has a training staff, and they're all fairly small. If the Packers had like 4 or 5 guys on IR, I bet Barnett would've stayed. This isn't the case. There's 17 players on IR, and you have to add the 53 players already on the team, and the players we have on the Practice Squad. That's more than 75 men the training staff has to take care of, and the injuries that take less time to cure are the ones they tend to first--that way they can get them back on the field.

So you're Nick Barnett, and you know you won't be back until next season, and not only will your teammates not pay much attention to you, but neither will the doctors.

He had to go home.

"blueleopard" wrote:



Mark Tacuh on IR Nov 12th, he has stuck around, seems the staff has time for him?

Nick Oct 15th, since it was a month before Tauch wouldnt the logical reason be that the staff had time for him too??

So your theory that the staff didnt have time is false IMO
go.pack.go.
14 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



He has a LOT of off the field issues? Like what? I don't recall him ever getting in trouble off the field.
UserPostedImage
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"go.pack.go." wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.

"go.pack.go." wrote:


He has a LOT of off the field issues? Like what? I don't recall him ever getting in trouble off the field.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

what??!?! You have not heard about the situation with his agent, or should I say agents. I think Wilde mentioned it a lot on the radio last year about how the team was worried about him. Lots of red flags!
blank
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"JordyNelson87" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.
blank
blueleopard
14 years ago


Every NFL team has a training staff, and they're all fairly small. If the Packers had like 4 or 5 guys on IR, I bet Barnett would've stayed. This isn't the case. There's 17 players on IR, and you have to add the 53 players already on the team, and the players we have on the Practice Squad. That's more than 75 men the training staff has to take care of, and the injuries that take less time to cure are the ones they tend to first--that way they can get them back on the field.

So you're Nick Barnett, and you know you won't be back until next season, and not only will your teammates not pay much attention to you, but neither will the doctors.

He had to go home.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Mark Tacuh on IR Nov 12th, he has stuck around, seems the staff has time for him?

Nick Oct 15th, since it was a month before Tauch wouldnt the logical reason be that the staff had time for him too??

So your theory that the staff didnt have time is false IMO

"blueleopard" wrote:



That is probably the worst rebuttal anybody can ever make.

Tauscher? Seriously? You're gonna mention that guy? He went to school in Wisconsin. HE LIVES IN WISCONSIN.

Not to mention his CAREER IS OVER. If my career was over, I'd love to go on free plane rides to watch the Packers from the sideline.

Tauscher is somebody we should've ditched two years ago, and it's pretty obvious that the reason why he's with the Pack is the free plane rides and Packer games.

The training staff literally has no reason to be watching Tauscher. He ain't coming back next year.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
porky88
14 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.

"JordyNelson87" wrote:



If youre talking about raw talent, I dont think there has been a better receiving TE to come around than Jermichael Finley has. His ability exceeds even Tony Gonzalez. All of Finleys problems have to do with off the field actions and work ethic. Durability is also an issue that concerns me, but there are not 10 TEs with better receiving ability or athleticism than Finley. There might be 10 better players because of other variables, which could include work ethic and maturity. In terms of ability, Finley is special.
Lynn_Dickey
14 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"porky88" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



If youre talking about raw talent, I dont think there has been a better receiving TE to come around than Jermichael Finley has. His ability exceeds even Tony Gonzalez. All of Finleys problems have to do with off the field actions and work ethic. Durability is also an issue that concerns me, but there are not 10 TEs with better receiving ability or athleticism than Finley. There might be 10 better players because of other variables, which could include work ethic and maturity. In terms of ability, Finley is special.

"JordyNelson87" wrote:


He said ever....which includes the greats...Winslow, Casper, etc.
blank
Greg C.
14 years ago
Yet another thread with a misleading title. (This one is courtesy of Mike Florio, but maybe we shouldn't just repeat what Florio writes. Rodgers was not asked about the picture and said nothing about the picture, and even the players who stuck with the team were not originally going to be in the picture, so the two things are not connected except in Florio's fevered imagination.)

Anyway, I'm not sure why Aaron weighed in on this issue of players on IR. He has a good touch with the media, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now. Maybe he needed to say what he said in order to assert his leadership to his teammates or something. But you would think that at this point he would want to throw a wet blanket over anything that has to do with the players on IR, whether or not it has to do with Picturegate. One thing that seems likely is that Nick Barnett has sealed his fate and will not be invited back next year. Too bad. I used to like him.
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6h) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (20h) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (20h) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : pro bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : it was always after the SB.....
beast (10-Feb) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (10-Feb) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : ok now for the Pro Bowl Game in Hawaii
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : If I was Philly I would try to end it instead of punting it
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : VICTORY! We have (moral) victory!
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Hey they mentioned that we 3-peted
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : seems to me the 49ers should have traded Aiyuk when they had the chance
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : if the Eagles get it down to the 1, do they Tush Push or give it to Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : 49ers have a money problem if they want to sign their QB
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Wait for real? Didn't he just get an extension two years ago?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : 49ers gonna trade Deebo. Interesting
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Replays always never seem to show the holdings
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Great throw by Hurts
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Where Carter falls prey to bad off the field influences (to be clear, not saying he'd clip someone though)
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Had Carter not gone to Philly were they already had a lot of old college friends, he ends up in a similar spot to Aaron Hernandez
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : I think some of his coaches told scouts to stay away
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : the street racing incident+conditioning and motivation problems
beast (10-Feb) : Then Carter was street racing, where the other car crashed and people died... and other teams were scared to pick Carter for some reason
beast (10-Feb) : I think the Saints traded up, giving their next year 1st to the Eagles, and then they sucked and Eagles got the 10th overall pick
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : wtf Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Getting Carter and Nolan Smith in the first round in 2023 was pretty darn good
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : for some reason i'm thinking of a draft where the Eagles where in the mid 20s and a top player fell all the way to them
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think so. I would need to look it up. Think it may have been Carolina's pick.
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : i'm not sure who i'm thinking of now
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : oh fuck me i messed that up
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Jordan Davis was 13th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Carter was 9th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles had 15th and 10th selections, moved to 13 and 9 to get Davis and Carter back to back
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles traded up for Carter, didn't they?
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Obviously he was a huge risk but getting a top 5 talent on the dline in the mid 20s is fortuitous
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Jalen Carter falling into their lap certainly helps
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : And we could only wish to have this type of D
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : It's not like Philly has had low draft picks, but has managed to get themselves a top notch pass rush. We spend so much draft capital of D
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : another crap halftime show
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think it is over, but then I think of Atlanta and want Philly to go in with the same intensity in the second half
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : And with a Pass Rush that might as well be on a milk cartoon and no Jaire
Martha Careful (10-Feb) : I cant help but feel good about how well the Packers D played in Philly during the playoffs
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
14h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

7-Feb / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.