Lynn_Dickey
13 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"go.pack.go." wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.
blank
JordyNelson87
13 years ago
Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
longtimefan
13 years ago


Every NFL team has a training staff, and they're all fairly small. If the Packers had like 4 or 5 guys on IR, I bet Barnett would've stayed. This isn't the case. There's 17 players on IR, and you have to add the 53 players already on the team, and the players we have on the Practice Squad. That's more than 75 men the training staff has to take care of, and the injuries that take less time to cure are the ones they tend to first--that way they can get them back on the field.

So you're Nick Barnett, and you know you won't be back until next season, and not only will your teammates not pay much attention to you, but neither will the doctors.

He had to go home.

"blueleopard" wrote:



Mark Tacuh on IR Nov 12th, he has stuck around, seems the staff has time for him?

Nick Oct 15th, since it was a month before Tauch wouldnt the logical reason be that the staff had time for him too??

So your theory that the staff didnt have time is false IMO
go.pack.go.
13 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



He has a LOT of off the field issues? Like what? I don't recall him ever getting in trouble off the field.
UserPostedImage
Lynn_Dickey
13 years ago

I have heard ENOUGH from these IDIOTS. I can name a tone of teams that one SBs without a great tight-end. I can name a ton of great tight-ends without SBs. Barnett is overrated....that is fact. The defense got better statistically without him! In one of our biggest moments these guys put themselves first. I am done with them. As far as I am concerned, I hope they get cut!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"go.pack.go." wrote:



You want to cut Finley? That'd be the stupidest thing ever. He didn't even say anything bad.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

1) Finley has a LOT of off field issues...these will come back to haunt him/us. 2) He cannot keep his mouth shut. Yes, I am being harsh on Finley, but I just dont see the benefit of a great tighte-end. I would rather pay to get better o-lineman. Yeah, probably being harsh on Finley, but I stand by my barnett comments 100%.

"go.pack.go." wrote:


He has a LOT of off the field issues? Like what? I don't recall him ever getting in trouble off the field.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

what??!?! You have not heard about the situation with his agent, or should I say agents. I think Wilde mentioned it a lot on the radio last year about how the team was worried about him. Lots of red flags!
blank
Lynn_Dickey
13 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"JordyNelson87" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.
blank
blueleopard
13 years ago


Every NFL team has a training staff, and they're all fairly small. If the Packers had like 4 or 5 guys on IR, I bet Barnett would've stayed. This isn't the case. There's 17 players on IR, and you have to add the 53 players already on the team, and the players we have on the Practice Squad. That's more than 75 men the training staff has to take care of, and the injuries that take less time to cure are the ones they tend to first--that way they can get them back on the field.

So you're Nick Barnett, and you know you won't be back until next season, and not only will your teammates not pay much attention to you, but neither will the doctors.

He had to go home.

"longtimefan" wrote:



Mark Tacuh on IR Nov 12th, he has stuck around, seems the staff has time for him?

Nick Oct 15th, since it was a month before Tauch wouldnt the logical reason be that the staff had time for him too??

So your theory that the staff didnt have time is false IMO

"blueleopard" wrote:



That is probably the worst rebuttal anybody can ever make.

Tauscher? Seriously? You're gonna mention that guy? He went to school in Wisconsin. HE LIVES IN WISCONSIN.

Not to mention his CAREER IS OVER. If my career was over, I'd love to go on free plane rides to watch the Packers from the sideline.

Tauscher is somebody we should've ditched two years ago, and it's pretty obvious that the reason why he's with the Pack is the free plane rides and Packer games.

The training staff literally has no reason to be watching Tauscher. He ain't coming back next year.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
porky88
13 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.

"JordyNelson87" wrote:



If youre talking about raw talent, I dont think there has been a better receiving TE to come around than Jermichael Finley has. His ability exceeds even Tony Gonzalez. All of Finleys problems have to do with off the field actions and work ethic. Durability is also an issue that concerns me, but there are not 10 TEs with better receiving ability or athleticism than Finley. There might be 10 better players because of other variables, which could include work ethic and maturity. In terms of ability, Finley is special.
Lynn_Dickey
13 years ago

Finley is one of the best receivers I've ever seen....

"porky88" wrote:

really?!??! You have to be kidding, he's not even in the top ten of tight-ends that I've seen.

"Lynn_Dickey" wrote:



If youre talking about raw talent, I dont think there has been a better receiving TE to come around than Jermichael Finley has. His ability exceeds even Tony Gonzalez. All of Finleys problems have to do with off the field actions and work ethic. Durability is also an issue that concerns me, but there are not 10 TEs with better receiving ability or athleticism than Finley. There might be 10 better players because of other variables, which could include work ethic and maturity. In terms of ability, Finley is special.

"JordyNelson87" wrote:


He said ever....which includes the greats...Winslow, Casper, etc.
blank
Greg C.
13 years ago
Yet another thread with a misleading title. (This one is courtesy of Mike Florio, but maybe we shouldn't just repeat what Florio writes. Rodgers was not asked about the picture and said nothing about the picture, and even the players who stuck with the team were not originally going to be in the picture, so the two things are not connected except in Florio's fevered imagination.)

Anyway, I'm not sure why Aaron weighed in on this issue of players on IR. He has a good touch with the media, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now. Maybe he needed to say what he said in order to assert his leadership to his teammates or something. But you would think that at this point he would want to throw a wet blanket over anything that has to do with the players on IR, whether or not it has to do with Picturegate. One thing that seems likely is that Nick Barnett has sealed his fate and will not be invited back next year. Too bad. I used to like him.
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Notre Lame=Notre Dame, Luckeyes=Ohio State, Pedo St=Penn St
Zero2Cool (13h) : ... It clearly was not what we were supposed to be in, certainly."
Zero2Cool (13h) : Hafley says 3rd and 11 call there was a miscommunication.
Zero2Cool (14h) : The only team I know is Texas from that. Who are the other three?
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Notre Lame vs Pedo St tonight and the Luckeyes vs Texas tomorrow
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Stud
Zero2Cool (17h) : E. Cooper. Rookie of Month. Defense.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : HUMP DAY
beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
15h / Around The NFL / beast

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.