Replace who with who?· Page 15

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

GraveDigga, you're comment (you know which one) is making me consider suspending people for bringing up that bullshit. You might be the first casualty if it continues.

It's obvious the Packers have talent, at least I think so because we're able to play dominate games at times. I think consistency needs to come from coaching.

"Gravedigga" wrote:

Ok, now i see which comment. Look, he's not the godfather. I don't have to kiss his ring. I don't have to pledge my loyalty to him. You think the problem is coaching. you think this team has the talent to dominate. Fine, i'm glad you have faith. I don't have that faith. I see a team with great talent other than an o-line which is hamstringing every aspect of our offense. Limiting our options, our playcalling and risking players safety. I see a pro bowl d-lineman who is lost out there trying to play linebacker because we didn't trade him. I see underacheivers in our front 7 and I see a GM who doesn't seem to know how or want to fix the problem.

But go ahead, ban me if you like. It is your site and you can choose to have people on it who think just like you. I realize this is serious business that must be taken seriously all the time and jokes should not be tolerated. I agree. Ban him!!

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Unreal, typical over reaction. Why is it so hard for you to see the bullshit comments like that lead to? Are you an idiot? I can't be the only one who has noticed the trend with that crap on this site. Unbelievable.

Anyhow I'm going to TRY and save this ...

You think the Packers have great talent other than the OL? Yet, you want Ted gone? (I'm asking, not implying)

I too think that it's time to end the Kampman to OLB experiment. Think he could be efficient as a end in the 3 - 4 or is he too small?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#142

Furthermore, I find it quite funny that 90% of the forum now believe McCarthy needs to be fired. "Some on here" were saying this for a long, long time and were given shit for it and called fair weather fans and Favre lovers and other shit like that. I think it's really funny to see how people opinions change........just like that over a two week period. Even the most die hard Mike McCarthy/Ted Thompson supporters over the past few years now believe he needs to be fired immediately.

I imagine that one day, people on here will be calling for Ted Thompson's resignation, citing some of the issues that "some people" bring up and have been bringing up for a long, long time. But hey, maybe that day will never come. Who am I to question an NFL GM anyway. I may as well just not have an opinion and hope for the best.

"Gravedigga" wrote:

I'm still not used to people claiming to be Packers fan's ecstatic over a loss. Yay the Packers lose and fans want the coach gone and gm gone, i get to laugh in their face because i wanted them gone before ever even giving them a chance. yay me, fun for me!

It's not funny. It's what happens when you aren't a negative nancy to everything that doesn't happen your way. You try to root for the team, the players, the coaches, etc ... but when you get disappointed over and over and over again. It wears on you.. Packers fan's are somewhat forgiving and understanding. And when Packers fans are collectively wanting the coach gone, there's a problem. The coach.

I'm not saying you're wrong with your opinion and desire to have ted and mike canned. I just don't understand why you feel you deserve a pat on the back for wanting this for years and now others are joining you. It's not like you knew what you're talking about. There's 31 losing gm's and hc's a year. SO being pessimistic, the odds are in your favor.

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

15 years ago

#143

Those who are calling for Mm to be fired (and may call for the same treatment for Thompson in the future) are doing so as a reaction to the play of the team this season and not to a single personnel decision made two years ago. There's a fairly big difference.

As for Thompson, he's put a lot of good-to-great players on the team - if he does as he should do and concentrates on the offensive line in the offseason, I certainly won't be calling for his head.

But I'll tell you what: Since it appears to be so important to you, you were right about McCarthy. Yay for you!

blank

Gravedigga
Registered

15 years ago

#144

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"Gravedigga" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Honestly, there is hardly any arguing on this site at all any more, at least from what i've seen. Nothing wrong with people expressing their opinions and disagreeing. Attacking forum members should be held in check. Attacking certain people associated with the team should be no problem for the most part. Man, if we all agreed on everything, we'd have nothing to talk about.

As for Kampy, I really don't know. I think he could be decent as a 3-4 d-lineman but his true calling is in the 4-3 and his value would he high at that position if we explore a trade. I'm guessing we could get a mid/late 1st round draft pick for him. We get 2 dominant lineman, a tackle and guard, one more stout DE and a playmaker in the backfield and this team would have almost no weaknessess next year on offense. Better able to run the ball, more efficient passing, chew up more clock to help our defense out even more. Teams would be playing from behind more and we could bring the heat, more turnovers, etc, etc, etc. We would be similar to the Oilers of the early 90's except hopefully more consistent on offense.

--------------------------------------------

A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d

Gravedigga
Registered

15 years ago

#145

But I'll tell you what: Since it appears to be so important to you, you were right about McCarthy. Yay for you!

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Well, thats just the thing. I don't think he needs to be replaced just yet. I don't think he's as bad as everyone seems to think. Maybe im wrong. IMO, our issues are with personnel and inexperience, not so much coaching.

--------------------------------------------

A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d

Gravedigga
Registered

15 years ago

#146

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"Gravedigga" wrote:

I don't mean "funny" as in "hahahahaha". I mean it as in strange, weird and ironic. I don't want the Packers to lose(unless they're up against Favre) and if i hated the team, i wouldnt spend my time on here.

--------------------------------------------

A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#147

I actually don't think he's that bad either. I just think he's too stubborn in the playcalling for his own good. It might be admirable (in a weird Quixotic sense) that he is so intent on imposing the system he believes in, but it's blowing up in his face and imperiling his job. I think he should pass off playcalling duties to someone else who is in better touch with the idiosyncrasies of the players and focus on overall oversight of the team. I think that might be his strength.

Either that or (heaven forfend) he needs to trade away Aaron Rodgers for a quarterback who better fits his system.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#148

As for Kampy, I really don't know. I think he could be decent as a 3-4 d-lineman but his true calling is in the 4-3 and his value would he high at that position if we explore a trade. I'm guessing we could get a mid/late 1st round draft pick for him. We get 2 dominant lineman, a tackle and guard, one more stout DE and a playmaker in the backfield and this team would have almost no weaknessess next year on offense. Better able to run the ball, more efficient passing, chew up more clock to help our defense out even more. Teams would be playing from behind more and we could bring the heat, more turnovers, etc, etc, etc. We would be similar to the Oilers of the early 90's except hopefully more consistent on offense.

"Gravedigga" wrote:

I'd hate to trade a guy like Kampman. I'm glad we didn't trade him last off season because we'd probably collected more draft picks. I'm kind of worn tired of the draft picks. I want some veterans on our team that can guide our youth movement.

To your other post. We've heard the same thing from mm over and over again. Same speech, same results, nothing is improving. I think they are regressing. Our special teams is getting worse each year. How is that possible when we trimmed so many good players to help out our special teams?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#149

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I think the HC's biggest problem is this. He over thinks himself, ultimately out thinking his self.

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

15 years ago

#150

But I'll tell you what: Since it appears to be so important to you, you were right about McCarthy. Yay for you!

"Gravedigga" wrote:

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Well, I suppose we'll all see soon enough. I certainly agree that we lack talent along the o-line, but other than that and maybe safety I don't see any big lack of talent. A team without talent would look horrible all the time, and that's not the case. Inexperience can be mitigated with good coaching.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (4h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (5h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (5h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (5h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (6h) : Who? What?

beast (15h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (19h) : meh

Zero2Cool (23h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (23h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (23h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24