So Zero.. you agree with me then. :lol:
"pack93z" wrote:
lol ... if you're saying the Packer should have been practicing this past week, signed Tauscher to help prep him for the Lions ... yes. I agree. š I've said that all along lol
BUT, when we weren't practicing this week, it was kind of obvious we wouldn't be signing Tauscher because why pay him for a week of weight room training that he can do at UW like he has been? I think it was UW.
He needs to be in football shape and you only get that with pads on an hitting people.
"Zero2Cool" wrote:
You have practice squad players that are dying to make their mark in the coaches and front offices eyes.. think none of them wouldn't be willing to work out with Mark if none of the 53 would have?
We are looking at the crucial part of the schedule if we want to make a playoff run this season.. any things that can help us should be explored.. even the smallest advantage we can get.
44K is peanuts compared to the money we shell out for the 27 players that we run through training camp every year.
Listen, I am probably reaching a little, but we burned a chance to utilize the bye week IMO..
This is my last post on the subject of should have, could have and maybes of the bye week.. it is gone.. time to move on.
That doesn't mean I don't want another body added to the offensive line to add some depth at tackle, allowing Colledge to stay inside and solidifying the depth inside.. we have 3/4 of the season to go.. we will have more lost time to injury.. just the nature of the game. Runyan or Jones might look nice.. or call the Bills and offer up one of our middle linebackers for depth or picks next year that can be transformed into long term solutions on the Oline..
They lost two more backers this week.. they may want a Barnett or Hawk?
"pack93z" wrote: