Zero2Cool
a year ago
The fun continues!!! Let's entertain this. If an NFC team offered a 1st, 2nd and multiple 3rds, I'm sorry, but Packers snatch that and it's done deal already. Right?  If Jets won't give the 1st, and another team is willing to? Why wouldn't you do it?

Per Craig Carton: The 49ers have offered a first, second and multiple thirds.


Craig Carton was talking about it on his show. The Packers aren’t getting what they wanted from The Jets, so they talked to other teams and the 9ers sent a massive offer




 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago
Supposedly, it'd be 49ers 2023 second and third and a 2024 first and third. I gotta think if that was on the table, the deal be done already. Unless they're trying to pinch Jets for better deal.
UserPostedImage
earthquake
a year ago

Supposedly, it'd be 49ers 2023 second and third and a 2024 first and third. I gotta think if that was on the table, the deal be done already. Unless they're trying to pinch Jets for better deal.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yeah, I would assume they would be using the 49ers as leverage to get the same deal (or better) from the Jets so they can trade him to the AFC. At this point though I would take it from the 49ers.
blank
dfosterf
a year ago
I don't even know if I care that Aaron would wind up on an already powerful 49ers in the NFC compared to the pure schadenfreude value of screwing the Jets management at this point. I would love to watch the collective media destroy those New Yorkers.
F#ck around and find out, assholes. 
itches. I don't even care if the compensation isn't that great, but I do believe the likelihood of Rodgers continuing to play beyond 2023 is far greater in SanFran, so would also tend to think contingent picks would have a much better likelihood of coming our way. At a minimum, it would be nice for this narrative to gain traction.
Zero2Cool
a year ago
Do we know what the 49ers salary cap flexibility is? Meaning, how much money can they free up to absorb the ~16 million that would be needed for Aaron Rodgers?

Edit, yeah, 49ers can easily restructure enough to take on that ~$16 million lol (I laugh because I didn't think they'd have any chance and they got huge kick the can chances) → https://overthecap.com/restructure 
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago
In the video, I did not hear the guy mention any 2nd round picks... just multiple 3rd rounders.

And that's probably because the 49ers have already traded away their 1st, 2nd and 3rd round picks... they just have three Comp picks in the first three rounds this year.

If 49ers are throwing in all three of those 3rd round comp picks, it might be more than the Jets, as based on current rumors the Jets are only giving up the future 1st round pick if they host a playoff game or make it to the AFC Championship game, which even with Rodgers they're probably not.


​​​​​​But if only throwing in two of them, then two 2nd rounders from the Jets MIGHT still be more valuable. Of course, I'm assuming the 49ers make the Super Bowl with Rodgers.
UserPostedImage
a year ago
Woody Johnson is puckered up even tighter now!

Thank you Clark Carton!!!!
Go Packers!!!!
nerdmann
a year ago

I don't even know if I care that Aaron would wind up on an already powerful 49ers in the NFC compared to the pure schadenfreude value of screwing the Jets management at this point. I would love to watch the collective media destroy those New Yorkers.
F#ck around and find out, assholes. 
itches. I don't even care if the compensation isn't that great, but I do believe the likelihood of Rodgers continuing to play beyond 2023 is far greater in SanFran, so would also tend to think contingent picks would have a much better likelihood of coming our way. At a minimum, it would be nice for this narrative to gain traction.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



It would be fun to watch a team like that, just to see how good they could be. 

Not afraid of Rodgers or the Niners. 

Byw, I believe Aaron could play at a high level for three more years, a couple more beyond that still at an above average level. Especially if he was "motivated."
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
earthquake
a year ago

Do we know what the 49ers salary cap flexibility is? Meaning, how much money can they free up to absorb the ~16 million that would be needed for Aaron Rodgers?

Edit, yeah, 49ers can easily restructure enough to take on that ~$16 million lol (I laugh because I didn't think they'd have any chance and they got huge kick the can chances) → https://overthecap.com/restructure 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



That's a really neat breakdown. Man the Bears have tons of cap space.

It's surprising to see how much the Packer's have, though they did restructure a bunch of contracts already and I'm not sure if this accounts for Rodgers' upcoming hit when he's traded.
blank
Zero2Cool
a year ago

I don't even know if I care that Aaron would wind up on an already powerful 49ers in the NFC compared to the pure schadenfreude value of screwing the Jets management at this point. I would love to watch the collective media destroy those New Yorkers.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Favre didn't win Super Bowl until fifth year as starter.
Rodgers didn't win Super Bowl until third year as starter.
Roethlisburger went to Super Bowl his 2nd year as starter.
Mahommes won Super Bowl his 2nd year as starter.

Basically, I'm saying I don't see the Packers reaching Super Bowl with Jordan Love during his year one starter, so it's not like Rodgers will be the reason why Packers lose. Could 49ers/Rodgers knock Packers out of playoffs? Sure, absolutely, but based on trends and history, year one QB starters just don't seem to make the Super Bowl. So, 49ers with Rodgers wouldn't scare me because I don't think Rodgers plays more than two seasons and by that time I think Packers and Jordan Love will be a Super Bowl threat. And if they aren't, then they are drafting another QB high in 2025 lol
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (32m) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (12h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (12h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (12h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (16h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (20h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (20h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (21h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (22h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (22h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.