Favre didn't win Super Bowl until fifth year as starter.
Rodgers didn't win Super Bowl until third year as starter.
Roethlisburger went to Super Bowl his 2nd year as starter.
Mahommes won Super Bowl his 2nd year as starter.

Basically, I'm saying I don't see the Packers reaching Super Bowl with Jordan Love during his year one starter, so it's not like Rodgers will be the reason why Packers lose. Could 49ers/Rodgers knock Packers out of playoffs? Sure, absolutely, but based on trends and history, year one QB starters just don't seem to make the Super Bowl. So, 49ers with Rodgers wouldn't scare me because I don't think Rodgers plays more than two seasons and by that time I think Packers and Jordan Love will be a Super Bowl threat. And if they aren't, then they are drafting another QB high in 2025 lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Supposedly, it'd be 49ers 2023 second and third and a 2024 first and third. I gotta think if that was on the table, the deal be done already. Unless they're trying to pinch Jets for better deal.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Supposedly, it'd be 49ers 2023 second and third and a 2024 first and third. I gotta think if that was on the table, the deal be done already. Unless they're trying to pinch Jets for better deal.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

This is fake news. 49ers don't even have a 2md round in 2023. Christian McCaffrey trade. 

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

That is true, but in the tweet video above, there is no mention of a 2nd round pick.
Just a 1st in 2024 and a number of 3rd round picks this year.

The 49rs have 5 - 3rd round picks this year due to the new comp. rules.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 

One other thing. Many of the twits keep saying Aaron Rodgers will not play for the 49ers. Aaron Rodgers said he is not playing for the 49ers. He did not say he wouldn't play for the 49ers. Big difference. For all we know, he might really want to play for them, for example, but is acknowledging the fact that the Packers wouldn't trade him to the 49ers, especially in the context that at the time of his making that statement, it looked like the deal with the Jets was all but completed. 
I don't know that what I am positing is true, but I don't know that it isn't. The twits aren't even acknowledging the possibility.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 

One other thing. Many of the twits keep saying Aaron Rodgers will not play for the 49ers. Aaron Rodgers said he is not playing for the 49ers. He did not say he wouldn't play for the 49ers. Big difference. For all we know, he might really want to play for them, for example, but is acknowledging the fact that the Packers wouldn't trade him to the 49ers, especially in the context that at the time of his making that statement, it looked like the deal with the Jets was all but completed. 
I don't know that what I am positing is true, but I don't know that it isn't. The twits aren't even acknowledging the possibility.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf