The Head Coach Search· Page 13

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

5 years ago

#121

Anyone have any insight into why the Packers would seemingly prefer Gase over McDaniels?

KRK
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#122

This is only conjecture, but I can think of several reasons:
[list]

McDaniels may be in a position that he can dictate wanting control of personnel decisions and the Packers may not want to give that to him.[/list][list]

McDaniels may not be a Pettine fan, and the Packers may be strongly suggesting to candidates that they want to keep him.[/list][list]

Gase was very high on many lists before landing the Miami gig. He didn't get stupid overnight. Philbin may have conveyed to management the turmoil in Miami Organization. [/list]

That notwithstanding, I live in FL and Gase is as popular here as Mike McCarthy was in Wisconsin.To be frank, I did not see enough of Miami to evaluate his decision making/coaching.

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#123

Anyone have any insight into why the Packers would seemingly prefer Gase over McDaniels?

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

I have been trying to figure this out as well. Without going into the obviously negative aspects of josh, this is what I have found about Adam. He was in charge of things when Manning was having his best year(s) (see: 55 td's). Manning has also been highly recommending him, on two separate occasions.

Where was Josh when Brady was putting up 50 td's?

Obviously, much of our HC search is about who can maximize Rodger's last years, as it should be. 25 td's a year is about half of what he should be throwing.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#124

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

McDaniels was with Patriots in 2007, when Brady threw 50 TD's.

I think Gase is the better one. Brady didn't drop off (in fact 2010 he had 36:4 ratio in one season) at all without McDaniels.

I'd rather Adam Gase.

sschind
Senior Member

5 years ago

#125

This is only conjecture, but I can think of several reasons:
[list]

McDaniels may be in a position that he can dictate wanting control of personnel decisions and the Packers may not want to give that to him.[/list][list]

McDaniels may not be a Pettine fan, and the Packers may be strongly suggesting to candidates that they want to keep him.[/list][list]

Gase was very high on many lists before landing the Miami gig. He didn't get stupid overnight. Philbin may have conveyed to management the turmoil in Miami Organization. [/list]

That notwithstanding, I live in FL and Gase is as popular here as Mike McCarthy was in Wisconsin.To be frank, I did not see enough of Miami to evaluate his decision making/coaching.

Originally Posted by: KRK

In other words half the fans want him canonized him and the other half want him shot out of a cannon

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#126

Josh on Friday. Packers flying to NO on Saturday to interview Saints' assistant HC/te coach Dan Campbell

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

KRK
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#127

Fitness said:

It seems to me only logical that McDaniels would be the front-runner:
- He has head coaching experience (an even though it wasn't great, people can learn from mistakes)
- He has coached under the best current coach in football
- He has coached a great quarterback and would command the respect of 12 more than any other candidate
- He and 12 would both have something to prove should he get the job
- McDaniels would want to show it was he who turned 12 back around
- 12 would want to eviscerate Brady's records

The Miami offense didn't impress the hell out of me, but, then again, they beat N.E.

The more I think about it, my choices would be:
[list][*]Pettine[/list][list][*]Carmichael[/list][list][*]McDaniels[/list][list][*]Fitzgerald[/list][list][*]Gase[/list][list][*]Bienemy[/list][list][*]Me[/list]

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK

yooperfan
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#128

Jim Bob Cooter, former Offensive Coordinator of the Detroit Loins 🤗

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#129

Jim Bob Cooter, former Offensive Coordinator of the Detroit Loins 🤗

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

Pass.

yooperfan
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#130

Pass.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Sorry, I wasn't being serious.
There was supposed to be a LMFAO emoji at the end but it didn't show up.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (8m) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (9m) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (19m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (31m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (40m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (1h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (2h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (2h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (5h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (5h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (5h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (5h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (5h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS