Zero2Cool
7 years ago

I can't stand the Lost the players crap. That tells me more about the lack of character of players than anything else.

scheme for players, another pretty cliché media term. Players play where their abilities best help the team. You start changing the scheme for one or two players, you end up weakening the entire team.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Oh, it's a cliche now because you don't understand it. Got it. I'd try to explain scheme for your PLAYERS but you feel it's to adapt to one or two players. Sure.


Separate thought, this was an interesting perspective to me.

sheilaspapa says:
December 22, 2017 at 9:42 am
With all the talk of “Fire Dom Capers” I don’t recall even one player stepping up and saying what a great coach he is, or how great it is to be playing in his system. I think his time is up. Let the other pieces fall as they choose.

UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago

Well Packfan.......how has NOT making the scheme fit the guys you have worked out for the Packers SO far?
I have seen year after year of an awful defense, that got us knocked out of the playoffs. So if what you have done doesn't work, how many more years do you keep doing it?
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result.

ONE player leaving and doing well, you could say was dumb luck. But TWO??? BOTH making the pro bowl??? Something is seriously wrong here.
If they don't change it, the result will never change.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



The scheme was made to fit the best players the team had at the time, which neither Hayward or Hyde were. If we could wave our magic wands or hop into our DeLorean and know that we would lose Shields, then perhaps the scheme could have been adjusted to better use Hayward or Hyde. Maybe in that case we could go back and prevent Hayward from being hurt all the time also.

I have no problem getting rid of Dom because of the bad performance of the defense. But saying he didn't adjust the scheme or develop players is asinine. It was Dom adjusting and developing that Hyde was even on the field in the first place. It is Dom developing that either of them were even looked at by other teams. Simple fact is that at the time Hayward was not a better talent or prospect and neither was Hyde. Would have been nice to keep them but the price did not equal what they offered to the team at the time.

Hyde is not a better player than either Burnett or HaHa. Hayward was not better than Shields or prospect then Rollins and Randall. Dom has been adjusting ever since he lost Collins, he had to adjust to 2 deep more because he no longer had Collins able to cover center field on his own. He has had to adjust to losing Shields meaning he has to keep help more because nobody had Sam's speed to recover from trail technique. He has had to adjust to not having Raji.

Without looking and realizing how different the defense would look today had it not been for them loses is foolish.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
DoddPower
7 years ago

Yeah, it seems like click baiting to me... here is what Hayward said... and he didn't even mention the Packers... to suggest Hayward snubbed or took a semi-shot at the Packers is one thing is more realist... to suggest this is the F word is WAY over blowing it...

Originally Posted by: beast 



I don't think you understand the Total Packers website. That's just how they are. They don't take themselves too seriously. I actually enjoy reading some of their material. Most of their headlines are more funny/jokes/clickbait, whatever, but it's clear if you read the article.
+1
DoddPower
7 years ago

I have no problem getting rid of Dom because of the bad performance of the defense. But saying he didn't adjust the scheme or develop players is asinine. It was Dom adjusting and developing that Hyde was even on the field in the first place. It is Dom developing that either of them were even looked at by other teams. Simple fact is that at the time Hayward was not a better talent or prospect and neither was Hyde. Would have been nice to keep them but the price did not equal what they offered to the team at the time.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Casey Hayward signed a 3 year $15,300,000 contract. It's foolish to think that his potential alone wasn't worth that amount of perceived risk at such a critical position. A team can never have too many good cornerbacks. It would be one thing if he got a monster contract, but the reality is he didn't. The Packers throw money around on players like this all the time.

I do agree that the money Hyde got was excessive (although it's probably not if he keeps playing so well). I don't mind that he wasn't resigned. It's more about the trend of defensive players having more success elsewhere and possibly not enjoying playing for Dom Capers that is more concerning. I don't think Dom connects with his players enough at this stage in his career.
beast
7 years ago

I don't think you understand the Total Packers website. That's just how they are. They don't take themselves too seriously. I actually enjoy reading some of their material. Most of their headlines are more funny/jokes/clickbait, whatever, but it's clear if you read the article.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



If you say so... but my sense of humor, hasn't picked up on anything funny on their site. But different people have different types of sense of humor and what they find funny.

But thanks for telling me, it's good to know, that they might be trying to be funny about it...
UserPostedImage
+1
DoddPower
7 years ago

If you say so... but my sense of humor, hasn't picked up on anything funny on their site. But different people have different types of sense of humor and what they find funny.

But thanks for telling me, it's good to know, that they might be trying to be funny about it...

Originally Posted by: beast 



They're trying to be funny, sensationalist, get clicks, or some combination. They often have some funny insults about McCarthy. I'm sure some folks wouldn't find they're articles funny, but I do. It's not a website meant for in depth technical analysis. Some folks take their entertainment far too seriously. After all, it's only entertainment. I should be entertained by it, otherwise, what's the point? Unless I'm getting paid for it or something.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago

Yeah, it seems like click baiting to me... here is what Hayward said... and he didn't even mention the Packers... to suggest Hayward snubbed or took a semi-shot at the Packers is one thing is more realist... to suggest this is the F word is WAY over blowing it...

Originally Posted by: beast 



I haven't gone the site in a long time. Too much sensationalism for my tastes. I know Dodd likes them. Good for him. I seems like dram in a can to me. They can get the point across without using foul language. But what do I know? I guess you have to be young to appreciate them. (No disrespect to Dodd etal intended.)
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago

Casey Hayward signed a 3 year $15,300,000 contract. It's foolish to think that his potential alone wasn't worth that amount of perceived risk at such a critical position. A team can never have too many good cornerbacks. It would be one thing if he got a monster contract, but the reality is he didn't. The Packers throw money around on players like this all the time.

I do agree that the money Hyde got was excessive (although it's probably not if he keeps playing so well). I don't mind that he wasn't resigned. It's more about the trend of defensive players having more success elsewhere and possibly not enjoying playing for Dom Capers that is more concerning. I don't think Dom connects with his players enough at this stage in his career.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Well if we would have overspent to pay Hayward, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Because not only would Hayward be on the team, there wouldn't have been enough playing time to develop Hyde into what he became.

Players get drafted based on potential, they don't get multi-year, multi-million dollar 2nd contracts as a part time player based on potential. That is a sure way to run a team in the cap hell.

I can't say how much Dom interacts with the players, he has never appeared to be that type of coach which is why I think he likes to be in the booth rather than on the sidelines. If that is how he wants to be fine, as long as he had assistants that fill that role for him. Kevin Greene seemed to do that, I'm not sure if any of the assistants now do. It never shows up on the camera during games.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
nerdmann
7 years ago
Hyde is good, because of his dedication and film study. Remember when he read that screen and picked it off? Parlayed that and a couple other plays like that into a huge contract.

FACT is, dude lacks speed for CB, size to play S. So he's more of a S, but we've already got too much depth at that position to be laying out that type of contract. Congrats to Micah, not just for getting the contract, but for continuing to play at a high level.

As for Hayward, he's a slot guy. We also have a plethora of those. Also, he couldn't say healthy here. Maybe his new team taught him how to keep those hammys loose.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
gbguy20
7 years ago
Fans should go on strike until we get a new cba that allows teams to actually practice again.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
+2
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (24m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (24m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (39m) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (41m) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (42m) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (42m) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (42m) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (46m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (47m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (47m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (47m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (49m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (52m) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (55m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (57m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (58m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (1h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (1h) : Packers will get in
    beast (1h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (4h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (4h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (4h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (14h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
    beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
    Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
    beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
    packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
    beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
    Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
    wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.