Posts from another thread, split by Zero· Page 6

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

7 years ago

Well by your own definition and your posting you are a Homer UFFDA, just in a different direction. If you read your own post objectively you might see that.

None of us actually know what goes on in the Packers organization, everything we post is opinion, just because other see things different then you doesn't make them wrong and you right.

Personally I have been wrong once in my life. And that was when I stated that I sometimes make mistakes.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#52

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Homer in a different direction? 🙂. That's some liberty there. 🙂.

beast asked me a question. I'd like to say objective connotes fairness and I believe fair is better than unfair. Unfair is exactly the reaction I receive to my honest attempts at fairness and balance to what we see here.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#53

In the end all you have done is say your better than others. (Because being more objective is better, is it not?).

Originally Posted by: beast

Is being more objective better?

It's a simple question...

My problem is that you keep implying that your better than others and your false claims that you are being attack due to your viewpoint instead of the real reason, your condescending tone that you write with.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

7 years ago

#54

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Objectivity is good, except when it's used as superiority.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#55

Originally Posted by: beast

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#56

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You keep thinking you are objective and you are not any more than anybody else. You think Hundley is terrible, everything you post about that subject is slanted towards that belief. You want the team to be blown up and rebuilt, your posts about that are all slanted towards that opinion.

Having strong beliefs or opinions on a subject which you yourself claim, is completely contrary to objectivity.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#57

Can we agree that how you define homer and what you feel it connotes is critical to this particular debate about whether someone is a big mean bully trying to belittle certain posters?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

No.
I didn't read the rest of your comment.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#58

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

? Go read what I wrote about Hundley before he actually started a game for us. I was looking forward to him recalling the dynamic player from his first pre-season. He was as impressive a player that I'd seen in many years. He never looked that good ever again, and has really looked awful in his recent starts.

I would agree that OPINIONS are hard to objectify in some cases. Let's look at one such instance that is coming to mind... during the off-season there was buzz about our defense being a lot better. Even Barfarn was on here saying it would be Top 10 or was it 5 by end of the season? I didn't ridicule him, I told him why I thought that was an odd opinion after seeing what little the team had done to fix it's CB woes. I took heat about my negativity for giving my opinion. Why do you think I took heat? Do you not think that a homer wants to believe the defense would be better, after all, it has Ted picking players for it and he's the best GM in the league, right? I chose to focus on the "fix" and say why it was going to kill our season yet again. Was that opinion wrong? Packers D is ranked 25th right now. We've all seen the CB play. Atrocious. However, I got blasted for my "negativity". I would say it was my ability to be objective that allowed me to form an opinion closer to the reality that we've all seen than that of the homer view that things were going to be better. Homer leanings led to a skewed opinion that has turned out to be wrong. I feel like my ability to be objective really helped me get it right about our defense but somehow it gets taken to weird extremes about what my methodology is here.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#59

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Right, to be objectivity one most be open minded...

A homer (the way it's often being used here) is not objectivity because they aren't open minded against the people on the team. Uffda, like-wise is not objectivity because he is not open minded towards the people on the team. Neither is objective.

And none of us are completely objective because we all have personal biases.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#60

at least you are not called a Marge.

Doh.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (5m) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon

dfosterf (7m) : Can't find the toggle, lol

dfosterf (7m) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .

Zero2Cool (13m) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.

dfosterf (42m) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes

dfosterf (57m) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same

dfosterf (1h) : *Friday*

dfosterf (1h) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy

dfosterf (1h) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)

dfosterf (1h) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from

dfosterf (1h) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy

Zero2Cool (1h) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!

dfosterf (1h) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40

dfosterf (1h) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in

packerfanoutwest (1h) : beer and brats woke? say whom?

beast (1h) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...

beast (1h) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based

beast (1h) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based

beast (1h) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?

dfosterf (2h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol

dfosterf (2h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.

dfosterf (2h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise

dfosterf (2h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...

beast (8h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...

dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?

Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!

Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”

Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years

Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea

dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?

Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career

Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim

Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )

dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?

Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.

packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off

Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing

Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name

Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk

Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?

Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?

Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations

Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2025 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM

COMMANDERS

Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM

Browns

Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM

Cowboys

Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM

BENGALS

Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM

Cardinals

Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM

Steelers

Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM

PANTHERS

Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM

EAGLES

Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM

Giants

Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM

Bears

Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM

RAVENS

Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM

Vikings