Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
buckeyepackfan
15 years ago
Every year since Ted Thompson took over, the rumors fly, in the end Ted Thompson has been very frugil with his decisions during FA.

He has done a pretty good job of resigning current roster players, and did make a couple of splashes in year two.

There really isn't any reason to believe that Ted Thompson will sign many more players, it has not been his style.

Looking at the available players in the draft, I don't see too many that can make an immediate contribution to the team with The Packers drafting at #9.
Most everyone knows the draft is a crap shoot after the first 4 or 5 players go off the board, this year especially.

Does Ted Thompson go after another d-lineman at #9?, maybe take a chance with M. Jenkins, even though he had a very unimpressive showing at the combine.

What about one of the O-lineman who are rated high on most boards?

I truly believe that Ted Thompson will try and find a team to trade down with, but not real positive that there will be any takers.

IMHO if stuck @ #9, why not go offense with Knowshon Moreno?
I do believe this guy will be a stud running back in the future and could give The Packers immediate help as Third down back and the succesor to R. Grant in a couple of years.

The NFL is a copy cat league and the 2-back system seems to be the "in thing" right now, with Moreno The Packers would be set on offense.

Converting to the 3-4 is going to be hard enough for The Defense, unless ther is a stud D-lineman available at #9, which I don't think there will be, load up the offense!!!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Dulak
15 years ago

Every year since Ted Thompson took over, the rumors fly, in the end Ted Thompson has been very frugil with his decisions during FA.

He has done a pretty good job of resigning current roster players, and did make a couple of splashes in year two.

There really isn't any reason to believe that Ted Thompson will sign many more players, it has not been his style.

Looking at the available players in the draft, I don't see too many that can make an immediate contribution to the team with The Packers drafting at #9.
Most everyone knows the draft is a crap shoot after the first 4 or 5 players go off the board, this year especially.

Does Ted Thompson go after another d-lineman at #9?, maybe take a chance with M. Jenkins, even though he had a very unimpressive showing at the combine.

What about one of the O-lineman who are rated high on most boards?

I truly believe that Ted Thompson will try and find a team to trade down with, but not real positive that there will be any takers.

IMHO if stuck @ #9, why not go offense with Knowshon Moreno?
I do believe this guy will be a stud running back in the future and could give The Packers immediate help as Third down back and the succesor to R. Grant in a couple of years.

The NFL is a copy cat league and the 2-back system seems to be the "in thing" right now, with Moreno The Packers would be set on offense.

Converting to the 3-4 is going to be hard enough for The Defense, unless ther is a stud D-lineman available at #9, which I don't think there will be, load up the offense!!!

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:



Interesting analysis of the #9 pick

while I agree moreno may be a good pick - IMO we already have 4 good backs ... I personally like wynn and jackson more then the others.

Wasnt jenkins unimpressive showing at the combine just due to his 40 time? While important his coverage skills is what is more sought after.

I agree about the Oline addition - I wouldnt mind a good Oline pick at #9; its just a matter of whom will be available at the 9 spot. If andre is I would be REALLY apprehensive if Ted were to pick him.
... although maybe Harrell would have a lunch buddy then to hang with

Our current roster may be able to handle most of the D needs and perhaps this is why Ted Thompson isnt getting more via FA. The D staff will have to figure that out.

I personally would like another DE in the FA or perhaps a decent Olineman - that way we could focus on other needs during the draft. But Ted Thompson probably wants one that is way cheap and who knows if he will find one.
nathaniel
15 years ago
Wahle and Rivera definitely hurt us the most.
blank
15 years ago
I've been all over the place regarding what we need to do with the #9 pick. First I wanted a 3-4 OLB, then a NT, then thought an OT would be the smart move...

I think if Raji is there, we HAVE to take him, and if he isn't, we need to grab another serviceable NT somewhere (Brace? FA?). I have to imagine Pickett will at the very least need someone to sub in for him at NT, and if he goes down with an injury as it stands right now, our 3-4 is done.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
15 years ago

Wahle and Rivera definitely hurt us the most.

"nathaniel" wrote:



and Thompson did not have the kind of money to keep them. I know Brandt came out and said it would have been possible but he was talking theory in that you could always make moves and free up the money.

What that would have meant was getting rid of other good players being paid what they needed to free up in order to resign these two.

So Ted Thompson was stuck in a place where you lose two or more to gain two. In otherwords between a rock and a hardplace. People don't seem to remember the Packers were OVER the cap until these guys left and even then only had like 2mil to work with.
"The train is leaving the station."
zombieslayer
15 years ago

Wahle and Rivera definitely hurt us the most.

"warhawk" wrote:



and Thompson did not have the kind of money to keep them. I know Brandt came out and said it would have been possible but he was talking theory in that you could always make moves and free up the money.

What that would have meant was getting rid of other good players being paid what they needed to free up in order to resign these two.

So Ted Thompson was stuck in a place where you lose two or more to gain two. In otherwords between a rock and a hardplace. People don't seem to remember the Packers were OVER the cap until these guys left and even then only had like 2mil to work with.

"nathaniel" wrote:



Well, I remember that and as much as I liked Wahle and Rivera, it was the right move at the time. So credit goes to Ted Thompson here.

The problem is it hasn't been fixed since. So credit gets taken away from Ted Thompson here.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
longtimefan
15 years ago



Well, I remember that and as much as I liked Wahle and Rivera, it was the right move at the time. So credit goes to Ted Thompson here.

The problem is it hasn't been fixed since. So credit gets taken away from Ted Thompson here
.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

wils0646
15 years ago



Well, I remember that and as much as I liked Wahle and Rivera, it was the right move at the time. So credit goes to Ted Thompson here.

The problem is it hasn't been fixed since. So credit gets taken away from Ted Thompson here
.

"longtimefan" wrote:

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Insert MM's inability to keep them at their respective positions while actually making them practice three different positions for many weeks. I definitely put some on Ted as I've stated earlier, but Mike McCarthy should take most of the blame on the lack of development on the o-line.
The Pack Will Be Back.
longtimefan
15 years ago
Sorry Wils...

I understand the being moved around, but can you honestly say the ones that have replaced Marco or Mike are on the same talent level?

that is an ISSUE that falls on Teds head
bozz_2006
15 years ago
I don't know if we can make that judgment. Maybe some potential is being unrealized by playing musical chairs so much.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (3m) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (1h) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (1h) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (1h) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (1h) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Zero2Cool (1h) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
Zero2Cool (1h) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
Zero2Cool (1h) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
dfosterf (1h) : Hats off to the Beast
dfosterf (1h) : I'm at 71.76% in pick 'em. 2nd place. Beast is at a flat 75% 9 games ahead. That 75% has got to be unprecedented this late in the season
beast (2h) : I don't care deeply, just want some good entertaining games
Zero2Cool (2h) : BTW, not serious.
Zero2Cool (3h) : You don't care about it either!!!!
Zero2Cool (3h) : NIL and Portal killed college, no one cares about it.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : outside of Texas-Arizona St, it's been a snoozefest
beast (11h) : I expect Georgia will change that tomorrow, but we'll have to wait and see. If they do, then only Big 10 and SEC are left.
beast (11h) : So much for Conference Championship meaning something as 100% (so far) of the conference Champions lost their first playoff game.
Zero2Cool (19h) : Jaire had surgery, season over.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : I guess I need a new sig Pic. Boo
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Eric Dickerson approves of this decision
beast (21h) : Eagles are resting RB Saquon Barkley, so there is no chance he breaks the record despite being just 101 yards from it
Zero2Cool (23h) : Patriots are waiving veteran pass rusher Yannick Ngakoue
beast (1-Jan) : Happy New Year's 🥳🎉
beast (31-Dec) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan
beast (31-Dec) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan
Mucky Tundra (31-Dec) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while
Zero2Cool (31-Dec) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?
beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*
beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
beast (29-Dec) : Taylor still at it!
beast (29-Dec) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over
packerfanoutwest (29-Dec) : Jets pull Aaron Rodgers for Tyrod Taylor
Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Colts-Giants now a tight one
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
57m / GameDay Threads / Martha Careful

59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

2h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

27-Dec / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.