DoddPower
8 years ago

Opium poppy seeds defined as "drugs" by the federal government. Otherwise known as a natural plant.

Heroin...It's natural so it's gotta be okay just like 7water Hemlock, which is also natural. Gets old reading how people who just wanna get high preach how it being natural makes it innocuous. No one was put on this earth to get drunk or high but it's amazing how many spend their short time here chasing just that.

Get help Sam.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I'm OK with any plant being legal. Synthesized drugs can be different, perhaps, but I am still pretty uncertain that the government should be spending it's time on such things. Moreover, pot is not heroin. I can go to a weed shop and buy all I want legally. I don't. Getting high has nothing to do with this. I can also go and get piss drunk wasted legally in many places if I want, but I don't do that either (well, at least very very few places, and only where such behavior is acceptable and expected). Typical weak argument. This is more about one's philosophy on the role of government, priorities, and utilization of limited resources, not about the legality of a plant, or a mushroom. Or even the world's oldest profession.
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Or even the world's oldest profession.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Dude, what does prostitution have to do with smoking weed, bro?
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago

I'm OK with any plant being legal. Synthesized drugs can be different, perhaps, but I am still pretty uncertain that the government should be spending it's time on such things. Moreover, pot is not heroin. I can go to a weed shop and buy all I want legally. I don't. Getting high has nothing to do with this. I can also go and get piss drunk wasted legally in many places if I want, but I don't do that either (well, at least very very few places, and only where such behavior is acceptable and expected). Typical weak argument. This is more about one's philosophy on the role of government, priorities, and utilization of limited resources, not about the legality of a plant, or a mushroom. Or even the world's oldest profession.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Ironically, one of my strongest beliefs in life is Big Pharma is truly and literally Satan on this earth. The amount of people we have on legal and synthetic chemicals in this country is beyond crisis levels. Human beings are largely no longer human because their brains have been modified by the drugs they're put on, legally dispensed. Those who dispense these legal synthetic chemicals should be in jail for stealing from people the essence of being human. It's something to cry, fight, rally to change. Our world has lost itself due to things synthesized in some lab. People just don't see it.

However, as much of a homeopath as I am, nobody was put here to be drug controlled natural or unnatural just like u weren't sent here to ingest hemlock.

Deal with life in all it's ugliness instead of escaping through drugs and alcohol. I don't believe NFL players mostly smoke weed for pain. It's done for pleasure.

I think cannabis should have it's pain properties isolated and put in pill form. Ironic, that I'm for this kind of synthesis but... I've always contended that dopers have driven this legalization crusade under the guise of false pretenses. Put the pain relief in a pot pill and tell the dopers they can't get high from smoking. The legalization movement would die if people knew they couldn't smoke to get high. I'd just laugh thinking those dopers cried about how it was good for pain. Great. Here's your pot pain pill. You don't get to smoke it. Those dopers would revolt because it has always been about getting high. I will remain strongly against legalization because it's premise is a lie.

I should have noted that tax revenue is another cry of the dopers. Yup. Put it in an OTC pain pill and you'll get 10x the tax revenue generated, but, again, it's never been about pain management or tax revenue...The liars just wanna get high.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


steveishere
8 years ago

Ironically, one of my strongest beliefs in life is Big Pharma is truly and literally Satan on this earth. The amount of people we have on legal and synthetic chemicals in this country is beyond crisis levels. Human beings are largely no longer human because their brains have been modified by the drugs they're put on, legally dispensed. Those who dispense these legal synthetic chemicals should be in jail for stealing from people the essence of being human. It's something to cry, fight, rally to change. Our world has lost itself due to things synthesized in some lab. People just don't see it.

However, as much of a homeopath as I am, nobody was put here to be drug controlled natural or unnatural just like u weren't sent here to ingest hemlock.

Deal with life in all it's ugliness instead of escaping through drugs and alcohol. I don't believe NFL players mostly smoke weed for pain. It's done for pleasure.

I think cannabis should have it's pain properties isolated and put in pill form. Ironic, that I'm for this kind of synthesis but... I've always contended that dopers have driven this legalization crusade under the guise of false pretenses. Put the pain relief in a pot pill and tell the dopers they can't get high from smoking. The legalization movement would die if people knew they couldn't smoke to get high. I'd just laugh thinking those dopers cried about how it was good for pain. Great. Here's your pot pain pill. You don't get to smoke it. Those dopers would revolt because it has always been about getting high. I will remain strongly against legalization because it's premise is a lie.

I should have noted that tax revenue is another cry of the dopers. Yup. Put it in an OTC pain pill and you'll get 10x the tax revenue generated, but, again, it's never been about pain management or tax revenue...The liars just wanna get high.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Who cares though? Pretty much everything people want is driven by pleasure. People don't put seasoning on their food because they need it but because the taste gives them pleasure. If someone wants to put garlic salt in their fruit loops I don't give a shit even though that sounds disgusting to me. If someone wants to smoke a joint in their house because it makes them happy who cares. I enjoy a glass of bourbon here and there but I don't really feel like it's "helping me deal with the ugliness of life" or anything like that nevertheless I still find it pleasureable, same with beer or wine. It would be pretty annoying if someone tried to stop me from doing that just because they view my reasons differently.
nerdmann
8 years ago
Shields may very well have been a first round pick if he hadn't been busted with weed a week before the draft. That's how we got him as an UDFA.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
sschind
8 years ago

WHAT?!? 😕
You think police would turn a blind eye to a bust?
You must be smoking some very strong stuff!

[list=1]Only time I've heard the Police turn a blind eye is (sometimes) when

  • they think it was an honest and simple mistake
  • when the paperwork they'll have to do is worse than the offense
  • no government body is willing to pay for the person to be in jail
  • when that person is fairly politically connected[/list]

    Originally Posted by: beast 


  • Rumor has it he did just receive a suspicious looking package from Colorado...I'm just sayin.
    uffda udfa
    8 years ago

    Who cares though? Pretty much everything people want is driven by pleasure. People don't put seasoning on their food because they need it but because the taste gives them pleasure. If someone wants to put garlic salt in their fruit loops I don't give a shit even though that sounds disgusting to me. If someone wants to smoke a joint in their house because it makes them happy who cares. I enjoy a glass of bourbon here and there but I don't really feel like it's "helping me deal with the ugliness of life" or anything like that nevertheless I still find it pleasureable, same with beer or wine. It would be pretty annoying if someone tried to stop me from doing that just because they view my reasons differently.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    I understand what you're saying but garlic on cereal doesn't impair judgment. Getting high and drunk does. Over 50℅ of crime is committed due to the impact of drugs.

    People enjoy smoking cigs or cigars but that behavior impacts me so it's rightfully banned in public places. Your right for pleasure ends where it infringes on my rights. Having a public high on marijuana is a baffling thing to try and enable.

    People love cocaine, heroin, meth. .. just let them do it because it's pleasurable? No.

    I'm fine with people who want to use alcohol in very moderate amounts. More than that is disgraceful IMO. U R not here to be high or drunk...Murder. Steal. Etc. I don't care who enjoys it.

    Drunks wanna drink...Dopers wanna get high...And kids wanna eat junk food all day.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    uffda udfa
    8 years ago

    Shields may very well have been a first round pick if he hadn't been busted with weed a week before the draft. That's how we got him as an UDFA.

    Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



    Joe Whitt is the one who said Sam could've been a 1st rounder IF he'd been a DB longer at Miami.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    steveishere
    8 years ago

    I understand what you're saying but garlic on cereal doesn't impair judgment. Getting high and drunk does. Over 50℅ of crime is committed due to the impact of drugs.

    People enjoy smoking cigs or cigars but that behavior impacts me so it's rightfully banned in public places. Your right for pleasure ends where it infringes on my rights. Having a public high on marijuana is a baffling thing to try and enable.

    People love cocaine, heroin, meth. .. just let them do it because it's pleasurable? No.

    I'm fine with people who want to use alcohol in very moderate amounts. More than that is disgraceful IMO. U R not here to be high or drunk...Murder. Steal. Etc. I don't care who enjoys it.

    Drunks wanna drink...Dopers wanna get high...And kids wanna eat junk food all day.

    Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



    I'm not sure our laws though have really kept people who want to do those things from doing them. It's mostly just adding another layer of destruction to their lives while adding money and power to nasty cartels and dealers.
    uffda udfa
    8 years ago

    I'm not sure our laws though have really kept people who want to do those things from doing them. It's mostly just adding another layer of destruction to their lives while adding money and power to nasty cartels and dealers.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    You're right. They haven't. This is the kind of argument that grates me to no end.

    People still commit murder although it's not legal. Those who want to murder are going to murder. Based on this logically bereft argument that drugs should be legal because people are still going to do them should we then legalize murder? The fact that we have a morally bankrupt society that wants to go through life high doesn't mean it should be enabled. I don't want to deal with drunk and high people out wandering the streets. We have public intoxication laws to protect from that.

    Personally, I'll never understand what drives a person to want to get drunk or high. Life might suck but deal with it. I never meant to imply having a glass of bourbon meant you weren't. We all know the difference between someone who drinks to get buzzed or drunk vs. someone who just enjoys it. I would argue that if you took the buzz angle away from alcohol close to 100% would stop consuming it. Non alcoholic beverages only sell to recovering alcoholics and those who don't drink. Those who drink are seeking some form of mood alteration and that fits with escaping from life's ugliness.
    UserPostedImage
    Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (46m) : Appears Jets released Adams. It'll be official in few hours.
    Zero2Cool (21h) : We have re-signed LB Isaiah McDuffie
    Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Jets taking calls for Davante Adams. That $38m cap number hurting lol
    Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Guess it's not official until the 12th
    Zero2Cool (2-Mar) : Deebo went for a 5th to Commanders?
    Martha Careful (1-Mar) : Just like my late husband!!
    Zero2Cool (1-Mar) : Once fired up, it should be good
    Zero2Cool (1-Mar) : Sometimes, the first page load will be slow. it's firing up the site.
    Martha Careful (1-Mar) : The site is operating much faster...tyvm
    Mucky Tundra (28-Feb) : It's the offseason and the draft is still nearly 2 months away, what can ya do?🤷‍♂️
    Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : NFL teams were notified today that the 2025 salary cap has been set at $279,200,000 per club.
    Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : sssllllooooow
    Martha Careful (27-Feb) : is it just me, or has the website been slow the last couple of days?
    buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Damnit 2026 2nd rnd pick!
    buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Packers get Myles Garret and Browns 2926 2nd rnd pick.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Browns get Jaire, + Packers #1 2025 pick and 2026 3rd rnd pick.
    beast (26-Feb) : Rams trying to trade Stafford and Kupp, then signing Rodgers and Adams? Just speculation, but interesting
    Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Packers shopping Jaire Alexander per Ian Rapoport
    Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst and Jaire Alexander’s agent, John Thornton, are meeting this week in Indianapolis to determine the future of the Packers’ 28-year-
    Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst says Mark Murphy told him he can trade their first-round pick despite the draft being in Green Bay.
    Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : Packers. 🤦
    Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team.
    Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team petition NFL to ban Brotherly Shove.
    beast (23-Feb) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter
    beast (23-Feb) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.
    dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that
    dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
    beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
    dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
    Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
    Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
    Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
    Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
    Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    4h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    28-Feb / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.