shield4life
15 years ago
lol[imgurl url=http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/jasonpasalis/gifs/nolan.gif]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v427/jasonpasalis/gifs/nolan.gif[/imgurl]
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
minnypacker
15 years ago
I just don't think Nolan's the guy. If he was, why not name him already. I'm guessing Moss or Haslett - Want McDermott.
Pack93z
15 years ago
We shall see... but the guy can coach either alignment and per the source listed here, isn't fixed solely upon either one.. scheme fit to the personnel of the team.. that is the smart way to coach.

http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20090106/PKR01/90106162/1058 


Mike Nolan has emerged as the clear front-runner to become the Green Bay Packers next defensive coordinator.

Two NFL sources said Tuesday that coach Mike McCarthy appears likely to bring in Nolan to replace Bob Sanders, whose firing was announced Monday. One source said word at the Cactus Bowl, the all-star game for Division II seniors in Kingsville, Texas, is the move is all but done. Another said there appeared to be at least a 90 percent chance Nolan will join the Packers.

Nolan, who was fired as San Franciscos head coach seven games into this season, has 11 years of experience as a defensive coordinator in the NFL with Baltimore (2002-04), the New York Jets (2000), Washington (1997-99) and the New York Giants (1993-96). As a head coach, Nolan had some problems with players on the offensive side of the ball, but as a defensive coordinator, he has a reputation for being a high-energy, optimistic leader whom players like.

I think hes a good coach, said a scout familiar with Nolan. Sometimes he was a little strong and butted heads with those guys (on San Franciscos offense), but as a smart guy and likable and all that, hes all that.

Nolan, 49, looked like a strong candidate for the job from the start because of his ties to McCarthy. When Nolan became San Franciscos head coach in 2005, he hired McCarthy as offensive coordinator, and the two by all accounts worked well their one season together before McCarthy became the Packers head coach in 2006.

Nolans 11 years as NFL defensive coordinator is a major selling point if McCarthy is reluctant to bring in a first-time defensive coordinator now that his program with the Packers is entering its fourth season. Nolan is a known quantity in the job, whereas another of McCarthys possible candidates, Winston Moss, never has been a defensive coordinator. Moss, who is McCarthys assistant head coach and linebackers coach, was the only defensive position coach McCarthy retained Monday when he fired Sanders and four other defensive assistants Monday. Moss also has interviewed for the St. Louis Rams head-coaching vacancy.

Nolan is one of several respected defensive coordinators available this offseason, along with Gregg Williams, who wasnt retained by Jacksonville because of philosophical differences with coach Jack Del Rio; Romeo Crennel, who was fired as Clevelands coach last week; Jim Haslett, who finished this season as St. Louis interim coach; and Eric Mangini, who was fired as the New York Jets coach last week, though he appears to be the top candidate to become Clevelands next head coach.

There also are some up-and-coming NFL assistants who could be candidates for their first job as a defensive coordinator, though again McCarthy appears to think hes too far into his tenure to take such a risk. Among the top prospects are Sean McDermott, Philadelphias secondary coach; Keith Butler, Pittsburghs linebackers coach; Pepper Johnson, New Englands defensive line coach; and Bill Sheridan, the New York Giants linebackers coach.

Nolan also has appeal because though he prefers to run a 3-4 defense, hes also worked in the 4-3 and mixed that in extensively as coach of the 49ers. In his first season with San Francisco, the 49ers ran mostly a 4-3 and gradually evolved into primarily a 3-4 defense over his three-plus seasons with the team. McCarthy also might prefer a slower transition to the 3-4, because the Packers roster is built to play a 4-3, and switching to primarily a 3-4 in one offseason could be difficult and require major changes in personnel.

Hes good now. Hes smart, said the scout whos familiar with Nolan. He can run 3-4, 4-3, he knows it all. It depends on what personnel you have. Hell do whatever, morph to whatever. Hell use your players to their strengths. Hes smart that way.

Nolan has had some ups and downs as a defensive coordinator in the NFL but became the 49ers head coach largely on the strength of his performance as Baltimores defensive coordinator from 2002 to 2004. In his first season, he took over a Ravens defense gutted by a roster purge, and it finished only No. 22 in yards allowed and No. 19 in points allowed. But his defense finished No. 3 in yards and No. 6 in points in 03, and Nos. 6 in both in 04.

Before that, Nolan had the difficult job of replacing Bill Belichick as the New York Jets defensive coordinator in 2000. He essentially ran Belichicks version of the 3-4 and improved the Jets ranking in yards allowed from the previous season (No. 21 in 99 to No. 11 in 2000) and dropped slightly in points allowed (from No. 9 in 99 to No. 13 in 00). That offseason, though, Jets coach Al Groh left to become head coach at Virginia, and new coach Herm Edwards fired Nolan and most of the rest of the coaching staff.

Nolans most controversial stint as defensive coordinator, though, came with Washington from 1997 through 1999, after four generally successful seasons as the Giants defensive coordinator pegged him as a future head coach. Nolans first two seasons with Washington produced a solid performance in 97, when his defense ranked No. 16 in yards allowed and No. 8 in points, and a bad year in 98, when it ranked Nos. 24 and 28 respectively.

Then in 1999, brash neophyte Daniel Snyder purchased the team, and when Nolans defense struggled it finished the season ranked No. 30 in yards and No. 24 in points Snyder went after his defensive coordinator. The first-year NFL owner considered Nolans defenses vanilla, twice had ice cream delivered to Nolans office to hammer home the point, and after the 10-6 season, fired Nolan.

Nolan caught on as Baltimores receivers coach in 01 the only season hes coached offense then became defensive coordinator in 2002. The Ravens had won the Super Bowl in the 2000 season with one of the best defenses in NFL history, finished 10-6 in 2001, then had a roster makeover because salary-cap and age issues. Among the players the Ravens lost going into 2002 were defensive tackle duo Sam Adams and Tony Siragusa, linebacker Jamie Sharper, safety Rod Woodson, defensive end Rob Burnett and cornerback Duane Starks. Nolans defense finished that season No. 22 in yards allowed and No. 19 in points allowed, before finishing in the top six in both categories the next two years.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
15 years ago

I just don't think Nolan's the guy. If he was, why not name him already. I'm guessing Moss or Haslett - Want McDermott.

"minnypacker" wrote:



One potential reason that it hasn't been announced is maybe Moss won't be retained as well.. by delaying the announcement and allowing the Rams search to continue freely, it gives Moss a better chance of landing the job, with a potentially larger pay scale, thus relieving the Packers of Moss's contract all together.. since he got a raise last season, whom knows how much cash that may be since most of the assistants contracts are guaranteed.

Not saying that is the case, but it could be a connect the dots type scenario..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
bozz_2006
15 years ago
that certainly paints a rosey picture of Nolan. I do like him. But I still have the gut-feeling that our next DC will be Winston Moss.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago

that certainly paints a rosey picture of Nolan. I do like him. But I still have the gut-feeling that our next DC will be Winston Moss.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Agreed, it is a fluff article, but he brings the flexibility of either alignment and per the source, isn't married to one or the other.. thus allowing the talent to dictate the alignment and scheme..

I am not sold on Nolan being the best hire... but...

If you are MM, in year 4, and coming off a disappointing season in terms of wins and late game performances.. do you roll the dice with a first time DC?

Talk about risk.. he would really have to be sold on fact the guy could bring a solid defense in year one of the system and guys coaching tenure.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
minnypacker
15 years ago
This article states Nolan, Lombardi or Brandt has been saying Moss. We will see who is more connected.
Packnic
15 years ago

that certainly paints a rosey picture of Nolan. I do like him. But I still have the gut-feeling that our next DC will be Winston Moss.

"pack93z" wrote:



Agreed, it is a fluff article, but he brings the flexibility of either alignment and per the source, isn't married to one or the other.. thus allowing the talent to dictate the alignment and scheme..

I am not sold on Nolan being the best hire... but...

If you are Mike McCarthy, in year 4, and coming off a disappointing season in terms of wins and late game performances.. do you roll the dice with a first time DC?

Talk about risk.. he would really have to be sold on fact the guy could bring a solid defense in year one of the system and guys coaching tenure.

"bozz_2006" wrote:




this is the NFL and the egos are huge so this is probably implausable but...

Could Mike be using Nolan as transition to Moss? I mean is that crazy? Like Nolan comes in runs the show while Moss gets added say-so. Kind of like bringing up Moss?

So Mike goes out and says "look Nolan, I like Moss as a coach and i think he has what it takes to be the defensive coordinator here. but its a risky move at this time and i think you can help solidify the situation while training/working with Moss"

I mean thats a possibility at least right now right?
blank
Pack93z
15 years ago

that certainly paints a rosey picture of Nolan. I do like him. But I still have the gut-feeling that our next DC will be Winston Moss.

"Packnic" wrote:



Agreed, it is a fluff article, but he brings the flexibility of either alignment and per the source, isn't married to one or the other.. thus allowing the talent to dictate the alignment and scheme..

I am not sold on Nolan being the best hire... but...

If you are Mike McCarthy, in year 4, and coming off a disappointing season in terms of wins and late game performances.. do you roll the dice with a first time DC?

Talk about risk.. he would really have to be sold on fact the guy could bring a solid defense in year one of the system and guys coaching tenure.

"pack93z" wrote:




this is the NFL and the egos are huge so this is probably implausable but...

Could Mike be using Nolan as transition to Moss? I mean is that crazy? Like Nolan comes in runs the show while Moss gets added say-so. Kind of like bringing up Moss?

So Mike goes out and says "look Nolan, I like Moss as a coach and i think he has what it takes to be the defensive coordinator here. but its a risky move at this time and i think you can help solidify the situation while training/working with Moss"

I mean thats a possibility at least right now right?

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Anything within reason is possible.. Could be a stepping stone for both gents.. Mike to get back into the Head Coaching talks and Moss to elevate his career.. on question, if people are truly smittened with Moss as talks around here suggest.. then wouldn't that be a little bit of a risk in training Moss and then watching him jet for a HC position he covets?

All this speculation is fun.. keeps the offseason talks juiced..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (11m) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (1h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (12h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (12h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (12h) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (15h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (15h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (16h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (18h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (20h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (20h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (21h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (22h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (22h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    7h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

    11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.