Defensive changes are coming· Page 4

longtimefan
Registered Topic Starter

16 years ago

#31

they better not give moss the head D spot

longtimefan
Registered Topic Starter

16 years ago

#32

Let Moss go as far as I'm concerned.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Agreed. While I'm not unrealistic enough to think it'll happen, I firmly believe we need to clean house in terms of defensive coaches (except for Washington, if we could keep him) and bring in a serious D coordinator.

I would let Moss go and get a HC job and thank him for his work here, but I'm not going to make him the DC because someone else might hire him. Our defensive backs were the only group who played tough all year long, so if any coach stays it's Washington, IMO.

"Since69" wrote:

++++++++++++++

all_about_da_packers
Senior Member

16 years ago

#33

Winston Moss might become a head coach. I doubt it, but here is a reference to it, along with the subject at hand.

Link:

Awaiting fate

"dfosterf" wrote:

My first thought: why?

Exactly what has made Moss even seem like good head coaching material? The position he coaches wasn't all that great this year, and more importantly he's been a part of one really good team, which was last year.

Perhaps the Rams are just trying to fulfill the Rooney Rule requirement?

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.

bozz_2006
Registered

16 years ago

#34

could be, AADP

all_about_da_packers
Senior Member

16 years ago

#35

Indeed, bozz.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.

zombieslayer
Registered

16 years ago

#36

I have an open mind going into this off season, but I admittedly would be shocked to see something major. Then again my definition of major is probably different. A new DC would be a start, but that's not groundbreaking news or anything. I think some new defensive lineman is what the team needs. That's the major news I want.

"porky88" wrote:

Agreed.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

zombieslayer
Registered

16 years ago

#37

Our LBs were terrible this year. Why everyone is ga-ga over Moss is beyond me.

"TOPackerFan" wrote:

Were they?
Or was it because they were overwhelmed because the DL wasn't doing their job?

One thing a lot of people don't realize about Linebacking is if the DL does their job, then the LBs can do theirs. If the DL doesn't, the LBs are overworked and completely worn down by the 4th Q.

I'm under the impression that the problems with the LBs this year had more to do with the DL than the LBs themselves. I could be wrong, but that's my 2 cents.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

wils0646
Registered

16 years ago

#38

I'm under the impression that the problems with the LBs this year had more to do with the DL than the LBs themselves. I could be wrong, but that's my 2 cents.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

That's exactly my point and what I agree with. It's no coincidence that every LB had a down year. There's no way all of them regressed. It had to be an issue with d-line play, IMO.

Look at last year for the prime example. Both Hawk and Barnett had great years with a deep d-line rotation and pass rush. It makes the most sense to me.

The Pack Will Be Back.

Pack93z
Select Member

16 years ago

#39

Note to self.. in the offseason project.. make sure that you include video of the poor linebacking play with regards to the notion that it is all up front.

I watched the line play and backers with utmost focus for the last couple weeks of the season.. I can assure you that the line play wasn't the reason for the poor performance of the backers.. I stake my rep upon that assessment.

Was Hawk hurt.. maybe.. but then he shouldn't have been on the field.. coaching decisions.. strike one.

No excuses for Poppinga, Barnett, and Chillar in the run game though.. or Bishop in the passing game.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

wils0646
Registered

16 years ago

#40

"pack93z" wrote:

Well, to be completely honest, the last couple of weeks, Barnett was out and Hawk was out of position.

I just can't see how a whole crew can decline so much in one year. It doesn't make sense to me. It's not like all of them are old or anything.

The Pack Will Be Back.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

dfosterf (now) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (1m) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (1h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (1h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (1h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (1h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (1h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (1h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (1h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (1h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (1h) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (1h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (1h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (2h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (3h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (3h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (3h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22