Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Well only 6 defenses kept opposing tesms under 20 points average this year

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 


I want a defense that consistently keeps teams UNDER 20 points per game. The yards mean nothing to me. They can give up 300 or 400 a game as long as they keep the opponent under 20 points consistently.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 






yards = opportunity.
yards= player fatigue.
yards mean your offense can't score.
yards means doubt sets in.

I want a defense that gives up 200 yards a game. Try and score from your own side of the 50.

BTW GB was 25 in total yards allowed and 24th in points allowed. They correlate.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


I want a defense that consistently keeps teams UNDER 20 points per game. The yards mean nothing to me. They can give up 300 or 400 a game as long as they keep the opponent under 20 points consistently.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 





UserPostedImage
DakotaT
11 years ago
Let's hire Leslie Frazier. I want to switch back to a 4-3 anyway.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yes Kevin I know the yards mean nothing to you. But in fact they mean everything to the team as I proved. QBs always think they can outscore the other team no matter what.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
11 years ago

Let's hire Leslie Frazier. I want to switch back to a 4-3 anyway.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



This was my next question. If we do move away from Capers, do we stay 3-4 or move to 4-3?

Personally I think Matthews would be able to switch to a LB in the 4-3, and I think we have the horses in that could make a good 4-3 line with Neal, Raji, Jolly, Daniels, Boyd, D.Jones, Worthy
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago
I don't participate in chat during the game, but I sometimes read along. It's downright silly that some fools in there - and in the forum in general - are blaming Capers. In fairness, there were, of course, a few voices of reason in chat saying it ain't the scheme or the coach, it's the players.

NOBODY in all of the NFL makes adjustments and compensates for personnel weaknesses like Capers. Sometimes, though, you just can't stop everything. Why are we weak against the run? Because we have to do too much to cover the pass - DUH! Why do we give up big plays sometimes? Because we are loading up the box to stop the run - certain times against some teams. Look at the Bears game - a LOT of 3 and outs - success, along with occasional gashes where doing what we NEEDED to do because of weak personnel didn't quite work.

A large part of the anti-Capers crap derived from what Kaepernick and the Niners did to us - twice. The season opener, Capers got even more creative than usual - with the whole off-season to plan, and he did manage to stop the runs that Kaepernick killed us with in last year's playoffs. Unfortunately, the compensation left too much reliance on single coverage, and we got burned. I'm really anxious to see what our defensive genius - NO SARCASM - puts together this time - his third crack at the Niners. Maybe he will shut up you fools who want him fired once and for all.

One more thing, it's been said, blame Capers for poor individual performance and fundamentals of the D players - "coaches should be teachers". Maybe, but the same people saying that tend to push guys like Greene as a replacement for Capers. Hell no to that! It is the position coaches like Greene that should be doing the teaching. If our tackling or coverage is sloppy, blame the position coaches, and the coordinator only indirectly for not replacing the position coaches.

Ultimately, though, as I've said over and over, the blame for faulty D falls on you know who - the damn GM who has put the team together.

I will now sit back in listen to a bunch of fools and whiners say otherwise.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
11 years ago
Texas, I thought I made you cry and you quit. You weren't working or anything last night were you "on the Dole boy"?

You'll get your wish because Uncle Ted just doesn't fire guys. But like usual, you are completely wrong on this issue! Capers flat out sucks, and is the beneficiary of having a high potent offense to carry his slacker ass. No wonder you like him so much - he's a lot like you - no credibility and never takes responsibility for anything.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
11 years ago

Why are we weak against the run? Because we have to do too much to cover the pass - DUH! Why do we give up big plays sometimes? Because we are loading up the box to stop the run - certain times against some teams.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



:-k

So we can't stop the run because we're focused on the pass but we also load the box. Makes complete sense.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Yes Kevin I know the yards mean nothing to you. But in fact they mean everything to the team as I proved. QBs always think they can outscore the other team no matter what.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



It seems like you're reaching to pick a fight and I'm trying, err failing to figure out what the fight actually is.

I want a defense that holds a team under 20 points a game consistently and I don't care if they end up giving bunches of yards in the process.

You respond with 2013 team stats that say less yards are the correlation a team gives up less points?

So be it then.

I'm not arguing which came first, the chicken or the egg. I am saying ... keep teams under 20 points per game consistently, period.









UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Texas, I thought I made you cry and you quit. You weren't working or anything last night were you "on the Dole boy"?

You'll get your wish because Uncle Ted just doesn't fire guys. But like usual, you are completely wrong on this issue! Capers flat out sucks, and is the beneficiary of having a high potent offense to carry his slacker ass. No wonder you like him so much - he's a lot like you - no credibility and never takes responsibility for anything.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Mike McCarthy is responsible for hiring and firing his staff, not Ted Thompson.
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
11 years ago


A large part of the anti-Capers crap derived from what Kaepernick and the Niners did to us - twice. The season opener, Capers got even more creative than usual - with the whole off-season to plan, and he did manage to stop the runs that Kaepernick killed us with in last year's playoffs. Unfortunately, the compensation left too much reliance on single coverage, and we got burned. I'm really anxious to see what our defensive genius - NO SARCASM - puts together this time - his third crack at the Niners. Maybe he will shut up you fools who want him fired once and for all.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



The reason that Kaepernick didn't kill this team with his legs is because he didn't have to. He easily sat back all day and picked apart the D through the air because he overcompensated by playing too much zone. And that's were we all start bitching at: once it was shown that the pre-game plan to stop Kaepernick failed, Capers couldn't adjust.

I think the post game show said it best after that game. Yeah you don't want Kaepernick running wild like he did last year but don't be afraid to challenge him especially after you spent all season saying how much more physical and tough you would be. Kaepernick showed he didn't want to run and take a hit on a stretch option play by IMMEDIATELY throwing his hands up to show he didn't have the ball after handing off to Gore.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
    beast (18h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (18h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
    wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
    beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
    beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
    packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
    Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
    Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    22-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.