Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Well only 6 defenses kept opposing tesms under 20 points average this year

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 


I want a defense that consistently keeps teams UNDER 20 points per game. The yards mean nothing to me. They can give up 300 or 400 a game as long as they keep the opponent under 20 points consistently.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 






yards = opportunity.
yards= player fatigue.
yards mean your offense can't score.
yards means doubt sets in.

I want a defense that gives up 200 yards a game. Try and score from your own side of the 50.

BTW GB was 25 in total yards allowed and 24th in points allowed. They correlate.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


I want a defense that consistently keeps teams UNDER 20 points per game. The yards mean nothing to me. They can give up 300 or 400 a game as long as they keep the opponent under 20 points consistently.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 





UserPostedImage
DakotaT
10 years ago
Let's hire Leslie Frazier. I want to switch back to a 4-3 anyway.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yes Kevin I know the yards mean nothing to you. But in fact they mean everything to the team as I proved. QBs always think they can outscore the other team no matter what.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago

Let's hire Leslie Frazier. I want to switch back to a 4-3 anyway.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



This was my next question. If we do move away from Capers, do we stay 3-4 or move to 4-3?

Personally I think Matthews would be able to switch to a LB in the 4-3, and I think we have the horses in that could make a good 4-3 line with Neal, Raji, Jolly, Daniels, Boyd, D.Jones, Worthy
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago
I don't participate in chat during the game, but I sometimes read along. It's downright silly that some fools in there - and in the forum in general - are blaming Capers. In fairness, there were, of course, a few voices of reason in chat saying it ain't the scheme or the coach, it's the players.

NOBODY in all of the NFL makes adjustments and compensates for personnel weaknesses like Capers. Sometimes, though, you just can't stop everything. Why are we weak against the run? Because we have to do too much to cover the pass - DUH! Why do we give up big plays sometimes? Because we are loading up the box to stop the run - certain times against some teams. Look at the Bears game - a LOT of 3 and outs - success, along with occasional gashes where doing what we NEEDED to do because of weak personnel didn't quite work.

A large part of the anti-Capers crap derived from what Kaepernick and the Niners did to us - twice. The season opener, Capers got even more creative than usual - with the whole off-season to plan, and he did manage to stop the runs that Kaepernick killed us with in last year's playoffs. Unfortunately, the compensation left too much reliance on single coverage, and we got burned. I'm really anxious to see what our defensive genius - NO SARCASM - puts together this time - his third crack at the Niners. Maybe he will shut up you fools who want him fired once and for all.

One more thing, it's been said, blame Capers for poor individual performance and fundamentals of the D players - "coaches should be teachers". Maybe, but the same people saying that tend to push guys like Greene as a replacement for Capers. Hell no to that! It is the position coaches like Greene that should be doing the teaching. If our tackling or coverage is sloppy, blame the position coaches, and the coordinator only indirectly for not replacing the position coaches.

Ultimately, though, as I've said over and over, the blame for faulty D falls on you know who - the damn GM who has put the team together.

I will now sit back in listen to a bunch of fools and whiners say otherwise.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
10 years ago
Texas, I thought I made you cry and you quit. You weren't working or anything last night were you "on the Dole boy"?

You'll get your wish because Uncle Ted just doesn't fire guys. But like usual, you are completely wrong on this issue! Capers flat out sucks, and is the beneficiary of having a high potent offense to carry his slacker ass. No wonder you like him so much - he's a lot like you - no credibility and never takes responsibility for anything.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
10 years ago

Why are we weak against the run? Because we have to do too much to cover the pass - DUH! Why do we give up big plays sometimes? Because we are loading up the box to stop the run - certain times against some teams.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



:-k

So we can't stop the run because we're focused on the pass but we also load the box. Makes complete sense.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Yes Kevin I know the yards mean nothing to you. But in fact they mean everything to the team as I proved. QBs always think they can outscore the other team no matter what.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



It seems like you're reaching to pick a fight and I'm trying, err failing to figure out what the fight actually is.

I want a defense that holds a team under 20 points a game consistently and I don't care if they end up giving bunches of yards in the process.

You respond with 2013 team stats that say less yards are the correlation a team gives up less points?

So be it then.

I'm not arguing which came first, the chicken or the egg. I am saying ... keep teams under 20 points per game consistently, period.









UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Texas, I thought I made you cry and you quit. You weren't working or anything last night were you "on the Dole boy"?

You'll get your wish because Uncle Ted just doesn't fire guys. But like usual, you are completely wrong on this issue! Capers flat out sucks, and is the beneficiary of having a high potent offense to carry his slacker ass. No wonder you like him so much - he's a lot like you - no credibility and never takes responsibility for anything.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Mike McCarthy is responsible for hiring and firing his staff, not Ted Thompson.
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
10 years ago


A large part of the anti-Capers crap derived from what Kaepernick and the Niners did to us - twice. The season opener, Capers got even more creative than usual - with the whole off-season to plan, and he did manage to stop the runs that Kaepernick killed us with in last year's playoffs. Unfortunately, the compensation left too much reliance on single coverage, and we got burned. I'm really anxious to see what our defensive genius - NO SARCASM - puts together this time - his third crack at the Niners. Maybe he will shut up you fools who want him fired once and for all.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



The reason that Kaepernick didn't kill this team with his legs is because he didn't have to. He easily sat back all day and picked apart the D through the air because he overcompensated by playing too much zone. And that's were we all start bitching at: once it was shown that the pre-game plan to stop Kaepernick failed, Capers couldn't adjust.

I think the post game show said it best after that game. Yeah you don't want Kaepernick running wild like he did last year but don't be afraid to challenge him especially after you spent all season saying how much more physical and tough you would be. Kaepernick showed he didn't want to run and take a hit on a stretch option play by IMMEDIATELY throwing his hands up to show he didn't have the ball after handing off to Gore.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (14m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (2h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (3h) : Packers will get in
    beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
    beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
    Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
    beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
    packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.