Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

I expected this a while ago. My answer is I don't have the time to memorize every FA who is available and then follow them on their current teams. Sorry. If that was my job I wouldn't be hanging around here and discussing it with you rabble. [grin1]

However you can't tell me in the past few years there has been no one all of the NFL that Ted couldn't have signed.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



If there was someone worth remembering, you would, that is pretty much my point, lol. Example, I wanted Chris Canty when we started to implement the 3 - 4 and even said we should overpay marginally to get him. Didn't happen and probably a good thing too. I think the Packers should have tried trading Aaron Kampman. I think we all knew that just wasn't going to work out, even though he led the team in QB pressures/hurries until injured.

There always players a General Manager can sign. Does that mean the player does want to sign? Does that mean they will sign? Nope, it takes two as you no doubt are fully aware.

When wanting to acquire a free agent there are lots of questions. Why is he available? Why doesn't his team want him anymore or why doesn't he want that team anymore?

You just don't see too many players who have worn out their welcome that turn out to be Charles Woodson for you, but it seems Packers fans think since Thompson did well with Woodson and Ryan Pickett that it means there are one or two players every year of similar caliber. Simply put, that year was the exception, not the rule.
UserPostedImage
QCHuskerFan
11 years ago

If there was someone worth remembering, you would, that is pretty much my point, lol. Example, I wanted Chris Canty when we started to implement the 3 - 4 and even said we should overpay marginally to get him. Didn't happen and probably a good thing too. I think the Packers should have tried trading Aaron Kampman. I think we all knew that just wasn't going to work out, even though he led the team in QB pressures/hurries until injured.

There always players a General Manager can sign. Does that mean the player does want to sign? Does that mean they will sign? Nope, it takes two as you no doubt are fully aware.

When wanting to acquire a free agent there are lots of questions. Why is he available? Why doesn't his team want him anymore or why doesn't he want that team anymore?

You just don't see too many players who have worn out their welcome that turn out to be Charles Woodson for you, but it seems Packers fans think since Thompson did well with Woodson and Ryan Pickett that it means there are one or two players every year of similar caliber. Simply put, that year was the exception, not the rule.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Excellent post! Let's look at a specific example of a upper 2nd tier FA that was available last year. He was one of the best OLB available in FA. He signed an 8M guaranteed contract with the Colts. His name? Erik Walden. The same player that GB fans couldn't stand and roasted nearly weekly. He is now on his 5th team in his career. He has 2 sacks on the year. Think the Colts are wishing they had signed more players like him?

Woodson is a probable HOF player. But when he left Oakland, he was a declining malcontent. Ted Thompson wasn't signing a stud HOF player. He had not played a full season in 4 years. He had 2 INT in his last 2 years. I would rate Woodson as a 2nd tier player in 2006 when he signed with GB. Then it clicked.

I lived near St Louis when Pickett was signed by the Pack. Nobody in St Louis was upset. He was nothing special, just a player. I would say that is a fair evaluation. Did you know he has only caused 1 fumble in his career? In 13 seasons, he has a total of 9.5 sacks. Not exactly the kind of player that you build around.

In my opinion, Woody and Pickett were the signing equivalent of Saturday and Benson. But sometimes things just work.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
buckeyepackfan
11 years ago
Wonder how many Seattle players would end up injured if they weren't taking illegal substances?

What is the count now? 8 suspensions/impending suspensions since Carroll has been coach.

I TOLD YOU SO! I TOLD YOU SO! I TOLD YOU SO!!!!!!!!!!


I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

If there was someone worth remembering, you would, that is pretty much my point, lol. Example, I wanted Chris Canty when we started to implement the 3 - 4 and even said we should overpay marginally to get him. Didn't happen and probably a good thing too. I think the Packers should have tried trading Aaron Kampman. I think we all knew that just wasn't going to work out, even though he led the team in QB pressures/hurries until injured.

There always players a General Manager can sign. Does that mean the player does want to sign? Does that mean they will sign? Nope, it takes two as you no doubt are fully aware.

When wanting to acquire a free agent there are lots of questions. Why is he available? Why doesn't his team want him anymore or why doesn't he want that team anymore?

You just don't see too many players who have worn out their welcome that turn out to be Charles Woodson for you, but it seems Packers fans think since Thompson did well with Woodson and Ryan Pickett that it means there are one or two players every year of similar caliber. Simply put, that year was the exception, not the rule.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



nope I don't remember Canty as a FA. Sorry. I don't remember desperately wanting to sign him.

yes I am aware.

of course there are many reasons. I trust the GM to be able to distinguish.

never did I say 1 or 2 FAs a year. I said 1 or 2 players every 2-3 years. Huge difference.


UserPostedImage
play2win
11 years ago
FA is as hit or miss as is the draft. I think the bigger problem is the lack of true balance with talent acquisition. All we really add are draft picks and UDFAs. Many of our other FA signings have been in the lower tiers with the exception of Saturday and Benson, who we whiffed on.

Looking at record alone for the past 3 seasons is almost akin to turning a blind eye to the other areas of need that have gone unaddressed through FA or trade, as Rodgers, we've realized clearly overcompensated for those areas left without talent upgrades both on offense and on defense.

A GM can't get his entire team via the draft, and expect them all to be better than other teams who apply a more balanced approach. I question how many games we would have won, how successful we would have been without Pickett and Woodson over that span, two very important FA acquisitions. Holding dear to your picks and re-signing them can create problems as well, as we've seen with AJ Hawk and Brad Jones. I believe a balance of draft choices, veteran FAs and key trades for players at positions of great need might prove to be a better solution to rounding out and improving this Packers team.

How effective is it to re-sign your own players when they've proven to have been unable to close the deal? Unable to stop better talent? Unable to beat the contenders, the teams who have gone onto win SBs? We knew coming into this season that OT, LB and S were huge issues. We really lucked out with the play of Bakhtiari. Many of us knew Brad Jones was not the answer in the middle, and questioned the players we had lined up at FS. When Bulaga went down, we really ought to have added a high quality player there via trade or FA. Knowing we weren't adding FS via the draft, we should have made a trade, and Jairus Byrd was available. I would guess a Byrd trade could have easily netted us two more wins, maybe three this season.

Trades are tough, as it takes two to Tango. I'm not saying this is easy, at all. The FA thing, as I said, is as hit or miss as the draft. But, it would be nice to see them trying. Our staff should have been able to readily see our shortcomings that Rodgers overcame with his own play, and those areas of the team should have been addressed a bit more aggressively. Its not like we are going to have Rodgers forever. Gotta strike while the iron is hot, and Aaron was indeed hot.

Balance. That would be nice to see.

And, as the article attests, "developing players like no one else…" I just don't see it. Our player development looks somewhat marginal under McCarthy, especially on the defensive side of the ball.
nerdmann
11 years ago

FA is as hit or miss as is the draft. I think the bigger problem is the lack of true balance with talent acquisition. All we really add are draft picks and UDFAs. Many of our other FA signings have been in the lower tiers with the exception of Saturday and Benson, who we whiffed on.

Looking at record alone for the past 3 seasons is almost akin to turning a blind eye to the other areas of need that have gone unaddressed through FA or trade, as Rodgers, we've realized clearly overcompensated for those areas left without talent upgrades both on offense and on defense.

A GM can't get his entire team via the draft, and expect them all to be better than other teams who apply a more balanced approach. I question how many games we would have won, how successful we would have been without Pickett and Woodson over that span, two very important FA acquisitions. Holding dear to your picks and re-signing them can create problems as well, as we've seen with AJ Hawk and Brad Jones. I believe a balance of draft choices, veteran FAs and key trades for players at positions of great need might prove to be a better solution to rounding out and improving this Packers team.

How effective is it to re-sign your own players when they've proven to have been unable to close the deal? Unable to stop better talent? Unable to beat the contenders, the teams who have gone onto win SBs? We knew coming into this season that OT, LB and S were huge issues. We really lucked out with the play of Bakhtiari. Many of us knew Brad Jones was not the answer in the middle, and questioned the players we had lined up at FS. When Bulaga went down, we really ought to have added a high quality player there via trade or FA. Knowing we weren't adding FS via the draft, we should have made a trade, and Jairus Byrd was available. I would guess a Byrd trade could have easily netted us two more wins, maybe three this season.

Trades are tough, as it takes two to Tango. I'm not saying this is easy, at all. The FA thing, as I said, is as hit or miss as the draft. But, it would be nice to see them trying. Our staff should have been able to readily see our shortcomings that Rodgers overcame with his own play, and those areas of the team should have been addressed a bit more aggressively. Its not like we are going to have Rodgers forever. Gotta strike while the iron is hot, and Aaron was indeed hot.

Balance. That would be nice to see.

And, as the article attests, "developing players like no one else…" I just don't see it. Our player development looks somewhat marginal under McCarthy, especially on the defensive side of the ball.

Originally Posted by: play2win 



Acquire all the players you want. If your unit is less than the sum of its parts, you still get what we have.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
play2win
11 years ago

Acquire all the players you want. If your unit is less than the sum of its parts, you still get what we have.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I guess that's what's really the issue, the sum of its parts. I would say we are deficient. OL, MLB, DL and S. Rodgers has been the most sacked QB dating back to 2009. Our OL talent has been a real mess. On defense, we are missing tackles like never before, our DL is not getting home to the QB, and they are failing to stop the run, our MLBs are leaving the middle of the field wide open and unable to adequately cover, and our Safeties are playing at a subpar level, giving up record numbers of +20 plays.

What does that add up to? Bring in some better talent and our numbers improve.
musccy
11 years ago



There always players a General Manager can sign. Does that mean the player does want to sign? Does that mean they will sign? Nope, it takes two as you no doubt are fully aware.

...Woodson and Ryan Pickett that it means there are one or two players every year of similar caliber. Simply put, that year was the exception, not the rule.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Two best points in this thread. I get the general sentiments and the feeling that Ted is sitting on his hands in F.A. However...

Stephen Jackson was someone Ted targeted. He low balled him, which is why he didn't come to G.B. How many more times have there been FAs been sought after by Ted, but the FA wasn't interested? We can't know that - it doesn't mean Ted and co. are balking at that market, though.

Using the Jackson example to expand on Zero's second point, Ted valued Jackson correctly, and in hindsight, the Packers are in a much better position w/o him on the roster now. Furthermore, Benson and Saturday WERE Woodson and Pickett caliber players (maybe a smidge older, but I'd say "comparable tier"), they were vets, reasonably priced, all the things people are clamoring for in this thread. They just don't always pan out. We saw the same thing with "Hardly" Nickerson and Joe Johnson back with Sherman.


play2win
11 years ago

Two best points in this thread. I get the general sentiments and the feeling that Ted is sitting on his hands in F.A. However...

Stephen Jackson was someone Ted targeted. He low balled him, which is why he didn't come to G.B. How many more times have there been FAs been sought after by Ted, but the FA wasn't interested? We can't know that - it doesn't mean Ted and co. are balking at that market, though.

Using the Jackson example to expand on Zero's second point, Ted valued Jackson correctly, and in hindsight, the Packers are in a much better position w/o him on the roster now. Furthermore, Benson and Saturday WERE Woodson and Pickett caliber players (maybe a smidge older, but I'd say "comparable tier"), they were vets, reasonably priced, all the things people are clamoring for in this thread. They just don't always pan out. We saw the same thing with "Hardly" Nickerson and Joe Johnson back with Sherman.


Originally Posted by: musccy 



Pickett was the leading tackler for DL in the NFL when we signed him, in the prime of his career. Woodson was also in the prime of his career with all kinds of room to grow. We reaped incredible benefits from both signings. Both Saturday and Benson were has-beens, both at the end of their careers, and we saw what that kind of bargain hunting did for us.

We need top talent if we are to be a top level team. With Rodgers going down, it is clear that we do not have that at many important positions on this Packers team. Fill just a couple of those gaping holes, and the landscape changes drastically. Sure, there is risk involved in making a trade or signing a FA, but with the risk, and some careful vetting, there can be great reward, like we witnessed with Pick and Charles all those years ago.

If we simply do not try simply based on firmly held D&D principles, then I believe we are eliminating a very important aspect of talent acquisition, and our team suffers as a result. Our ability to be successful, truly successful, is hindered. If we cannot compete to the level of our competitors, then we are not successful. It is blatantly clear this current team is not on the same level as many others in today's NFL. That's because we are constantly trying to develop young draftees and UDFAs, ignoring some highly skilled players that could be ours with some doing. Add to that, our player development in a few position groups is highly suspect.

A more balanced approach, adding some proven talent through FA and trades, along with sound drafting might prove more effective in making us truly competitive again. Assuming some risk there could be a good thing. Currently, we don't assume any, because we are always fishing the bottom of the talent pool in FA, and we don't make those important and difficult trades.
QCHuskerFan
11 years ago

Woodson was also in the prime of his career with all kinds of room to grow.

Originally Posted by: play2win 



Absolutely. As long as you define 'Prime' as constantly injured and underperforming. Look at his career. What we got in GB was 180 degrees from what he was producing in Oakland. You could not predict how he did in GB by how he did in Oakland. He was a marginal signing. How many players take a big leap forward in their 9th year in the league? He did. Think Ted Thompson can count on that with all future signings?

Prime of his career? 😆

Jackson is a prime example of what is available in the 'highly skilled' FA market. He is injured and hitting career lows for Atlanta. He might end up leading the league in rushing. I might flap my arms and fly to the moon. Both are about equally likely.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Fan Shout
beast (8m) : Happy New Year's 🥳🎉
beast (8h) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan
beast (8h) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan
Mucky Tundra (10h) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?
beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*
beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
beast (29-Dec) : Taylor still at it!
beast (29-Dec) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over
packerfanoutwest (29-Dec) : Jets pull Aaron Rodgers for Tyrod Taylor
Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Colts-Giants now a tight one
beast (29-Dec) : Still early, but Giants 14 to 3 over Colts
beast (29-Dec) : With Broncos losing to the Bengals, Colts got to control their destiny for the 7th seed... looks like they're about to give it up
Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : I believe Pickett is starting for Philly
beast (29-Dec) : Is the Eagles QB Hurts playing? I forgot to check
Zero2Cool (29-Dec) : Watson unlikely to play today.
Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Good job gpg!
go.pack.go. (29-Dec) : I figured out the signature thing. I had to find a different hosting website
Zero2Cool (28-Dec) : Packers elevated S Omar Brown.
go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : I tried the [img][/img] but that didn’t work
go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : How do I upload a picture to change my signature? I haven’t done it in years lol. I have the picture but can’t get it to work
Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Saturday NFL games=the season is about to get serious
Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.
buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,
buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games
Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (27-Dec) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : That was terrible.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

15h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

31-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

30-Dec / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

27-Dec / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

27-Dec / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.