QCHuskerFan
11 years ago
Packers were 5-2 when Rodgers got hurt. They have gone 0-4-1 since. If he had not been injured, I am predicting they would have gone 3-2 or 4-1, making them 8-4 or 9-3. Which would have them in 1st place in the North with a probable 2 or 3 game lead. Homefield to start the playoffs.

So they would have the 2nd or 3rd best record in the NFC. Doesn't sound like a colossal mess to me.

Of course Rodgers covers up flaws. He is the best player (Top 3 anyway) in the NFL. That's what he does. That's what an elite player does. Think of any elite player in sports. Can you name more than 2 of Jordan's teammates? What about the 1980's Lakers? There was Magic and Kareem and... Gretzky's line mates were? Who played DL for the Niners when they won Super Bowls behind Montana?

Draft good players is the opposite of draft and develop? This may be the dumbest thing I've heard. I guess Ted Thompson should just draft Clowney in the 7th round, Lewan in the 6th, Clinton Dix in the 5th, Richardson in the 4th, Barr and Matthews in the 3rd, Watkins in the 2nd and whoever falls to us in the 1st. Wow. Never thought of this strategy. Huh. Just draft the best players. Stop the presses!

Predictable that Lacy would succeed? Based on what? The previous 2 RB's from AL drafted in the first round in the last couple years? Trent Richardson and, um, oh yeah, Mark Ingram. Ingram has 1,350 yards in his 3 year NFL career. Richardson has 1,361 in almost 2 years. Not exactly setting a high standard for AL backs.

"a lot of other teams have gotten a lot of better players with no better draft position than the Packers." Prove it. In the last 5 years, the Packers average the #24 pick. So show me the teams that pick in the bottom 3rd of the draft that find a 'lot of better players'. Not just a first round pick here or there. You said a lot of players. And a lot of teams. I'll be waiting.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Laser Gunns
11 years ago

The Seahawks are looking to win now. In 5 years they will be average and declining. The Packers will be good for the next 10 years. So which is better? I know that at some points there wont be a "super team" and thoes times are more than not in the current nfl. The packers will win again when, much like 2010, there isn't a super team. Just a team that's really good and will win

Originally Posted by: The_Green_Ninja 



Seattle has drafted a lot better than GB recently.

They overturned that whole roster when Pete got there.

It's not just Russell Wilson they have on the cheap, Sherman and others too.

THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DRAFT WELL

And ya know what? Players will leave, and cheap players will continue to come it because Jon is better than Ted.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
steveishere
11 years ago

Seattle has drafted a lot better than GB recently.

They overturned that whole roster when Pete got there.

It's not just Russell Wilson they have on the cheap, Sherman and others too.

THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DRAFT WELL

And ya know what? Players will leave, and cheap players will continue to come it because Jon is better than Ted.

Originally Posted by: RajiRoar 



A lot better is kind of a stretch. They got a couple really good guys but most of their last three drafts arent really doing much.
QCHuskerFan
11 years ago


QCHusker- Selecting FAs which is what Ted did in the first few years helped get GB to the SB. Moving away from it has not helped them get back there. A few more quality players at key positions would make a huge difference in this team even without Aaron. They don't have them. They have a bunch of kids with little or no experience trying to make the jump from NCAA to NFL and they are struggling.

I love how people who never want GB to pick up a FA always go for the highest profile players at the highest price in order to try and prove a point. In doing so you prove that you are not listening (or reading) what others are saying (or typing) The majority of people on this site at least that would like to see FA acquisitions that are 2nd tier even 3rd tier players. They won't put GB ion a financial bind and they can certainly add to the overall strength of the team.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



In 2013, Ted Thompson has signed the following 2nd and 3rd tier FA:
Tavecchio
Means
Mulligan
Cunningham
Young
Wilson
Wallace
Harper
Banjo
And several others that I didn't even recognize. And there were others such as Flynn and Bell that I left off due to the circumstances. The fact that most of these players did not contribute doesn't mean Ted Thompson isn't signing FA. They just represent your 2nd & 3rd tier players that are available.

In 2013, Ted Thompson brought in 2 different FA kickers (Tavecchio and Ramirez) to compete with/ inspire Crosby. Don't say he doesn't sign FA. It's just not true. He just hasn't signed the ones that will win the SB single handed.

In 2012, Ted Thompson signed Saturday and Benson. They were probably upper level 2nd tier. How'd that work out?
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Laser Gunns
11 years ago

A lot better is kind of a stretch. They got a couple really good guys but most of their last three drafts arent really doing much.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Uhh

2010: Russell Okung
Earl Thomas
Kam Chancellor


2011: Richard Sherman (best corner in the league)
Malcom Smith
KJ Wright

2012: Bruce Irvin
Bobby Wagner (could have been DROY over kuechly)
Russell Wilson
Robert Turbine (fantasy owners keep an eye on this guy for when he replaces Lynch)
JR Sweezy (now an OG)


These are just the guys I know off the top of my head.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

What Free Agents could the Packers have signed that would have made a difference? I can't recall anyone worth their signed salary that would have contributed much if at all.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I expected this a while ago. My answer is I don't have the time to memorize every FA who is available and then follow them on their current teams. Sorry. If that was my job I wouldn't be hanging around here and discussing it with you rabble. [grin1]

However you can't tell me in the past few years there has been no one all of the NFL that Ted couldn't have signed.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
11 years ago

Uhh

2010: Russell Okung
Earl Thomas
Kam Chancellor


2011: Richard Sherman (best corner in the league)
Malcom Smith
KJ Wright

2012: Bruce Irvin
Bobby Wagner (could have been DROY over kuechly)
Russell Wilson
Robert Turbine (fantasy owners keep an eye on this guy for when he replaces Lynch)
JR Sweezy (now an OG)


These are just the guys I know off the top of my head.

Originally Posted by: RajiRoar 



2010 wasnt in the last 3 drafts and they were also drafting at 6 that year.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

In 2013, Ted Thompson has signed the following 2nd and 3rd tier FA:
Tavecchio
Means
Mulligan
Cunningham
Young
Wilson
Wallace
Harper
Banjo
And several others that I didn't even recognize. And there were others such as Flynn and Bell that I left off due to the circumstances. The fact that most of these players did not contribute doesn't mean Ted Thompson isn't signing FA. They just represent your 2nd & 3rd tier players that are available.

In 2013, Ted Thompson brought in 2 different FA kickers (Tavecchio and Ramirez) to compete with/ inspire Crosby. Don't say he doesn't sign FA. It's just not true. He just hasn't signed the ones that will win the SB single handed.

In 2012, Ted Thompson signed Saturday and Benson. They were probably upper level 2nd tier. How'd that work out?

Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan 



I think we have a bit of a misunderstanding. I never said or meant to imply Ted NEVER signs FAs. Woodson and Pickett proves he did. I said I would like to see MORE FA signings. Like any player acquired whether via the draft , trade or off the street there will be some that stick and some that don't. You don't sign 1 guy and when it doesn't work out say that proves FAs don't work out.

As to your list.

Tavecchio
Cunningham
Harper drafted by Seattle but never played for them or SF.

These don't count as FAs because they were didn't play for their prior teams. They are more like the street and college FAs Ted likes to sign. It may be splitting hairs a bit but since you brought it up I am willing to talk about it.
Otherwise we may as well say GB does sign FAs because of
LB Victor Aiyewa
LB Andy Mulumba
G Lane Taylor
TE Jake Stoneburner
WR Myles White
among others.

Sorry right now I can't remember who Wilson and Means are. Don't have time to look them up at the moment.

That leaves

Mulligan 6 teams in 7 years isn't much of a 3rd string FA. But I will agree he is.
Young had no chance to make the team. Didn’t have time to learn the system. Even Ted said he made a mistake by not giving him a chance.
Wallace see Young.

I will even throw Saturday and Benson in too. (I like your post by the way. It is easy to forget about who didn't make the team.) As I said I don't think I said Ted never signs FAs. If I did I didn't mean it. Simply I would like to see more. I had high hopes for Saturday and Benson. If he wasn't injured last year Benson may still be with GB.


But overall this is a pretty pitiful list. Uncle Teddy could have tried a little harder if he wanted to. Obviously he doesn't want to. He is in charge and all we can do is comment that we would like it if he did get some outside talent to supplement the draft and what he finds on the street. I don't think that is being disloyal to him or the Packers to say so.
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago
As I said before, I'm certainly not advocating massive free agent signings, but I think when people talk about "he should have done more ......", they mean something more like Charles Woodson every 2 or 3 years. I don't know he'd be considered lower first tier or upper second tier, but like that - not nobodies.

Yeah, Seattle has done better, and probably a lot of other teams too. Some of that can be attributed to Thompson's mania for trading down. What you end up with is more players - presumably more competition, but less quality. I'd rather have fewer but better players. And if we need competition, there is always UDFAs. Mulumba has been better than Palmer; Boykin has been decent; Same for various others.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
steveishere
11 years ago

As I said before, I'm certainly not advocating massive free agent signings, but I think when people talk about "he should have done more ......", they mean something more like Charles Woodson every 2 or 3 years. I don't know he'd be considered lower first tier or upper second tier, but like that - not nobodies.

Yeah, Seattle has done better, and probably a lot of other teams too. Some of that can be attributed to Thompson's mania for trading down. What you end up with is more players - presumably more competition, but less quality. I'd rather have fewer but better players. And if we need competition, there is always UDFAs. Mulumba has been better than Palmer; Boykin has been decent; Same for various others.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



There aren't HOF quality players available for relative bargains every year. Woodson was a once in a lifetime hit in FA.

What "mania for trading down" are you talking about? The only upper round trade downs I can think of were when we traded out of the 1st and got Jordy Nelson and last year when we traded down in the 2nd and got Lacy. In that time we've had trade ups in the 1st for Clay and in the 2nd for Hayward and I think Worthy. Any other trade downs were I believe primarily in 5th-7th round area and at that point in the draft it's just a crapshoot anyways so who cares.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (1h) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (1h) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (1h) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (1h) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (2h) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (2h) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (2h) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (2h) : *Friday*
dfosterf (2h) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (2h) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (3h) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (3h) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (3h) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
dfosterf (3h) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (3h) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
beast (3h) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
beast (3h) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
beast (3h) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
beast (3h) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
dfosterf (3h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
dfosterf (4h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
dfosterf (4h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
dfosterf (4h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
beast (10h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.