The most frustrated with Aaron Rodgers is....· Page 3

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

16 years ago

Ya!

Brett had another great 4th Quarter Come Back Yesterday. Aaron needs one of these.

Brett had 4 possessions in the Fourth Quarter yesterday. He completed one pass, no touchdowns, and did not get a single first down. But that does not matter. He won.

In the Fourth Quarter the Jet's Defence got three INT's and a fumble recovery for a touchdown.

Aaron needs one of those great comebacks like Brett's yesterday.

Until Aaron can do what Brett did yesterday in the Fourth Quarter Aaron is a loser.

"RaiderPride" wrote:

This post is so blatantly irrational, it's tantamount to trolling.

A quarterback who completes a single pass in a quarter does not "win" a game. His team wins in spite of him.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

16 years ago

#22

Brett had another great 4th Quarter Come Back Yesterday.

"RaiderPride" wrote:

Favre didn't lead that comeback in any sense of the word. Losman gave up a fumble, which the Jets defense recovered, promptly fumbled, then managed to recover again and run it in for a touchdown. Favre, who had tossed two interceptions previously, had nothing to do with it. To say otherwise is preposterous on its face and seriously damages your credibility. There's only so far you can stretch the messianic adulation before it becomes not only ridiculous, but downright risible.

Brett had 4 possessions in the Fourth Quarter yesterday. He completed one pass, no touchdowns, and did not get a single first down. But that does not matter.

"RaiderPride" wrote:

If Rodgers had those identical statistics yesterday and won, no one would be calling him a winner. They would be citing those statistics as proof of how mediocre he is -- of how he has never won a game for his team.

You CAN'T have it both ways, people.

Pack93z
Select Member

16 years ago

#23

Drivel.. it is sarcasm from RaiderPride.. stirring the pot yes..

RP's making a point.. Brett didn't carry his team yesterday to victory.. he is slapping that into the context of the blaming Rodgers for the Packers problems.

I want to see that from Rodgers yes.. and I agree to this point Rodgers hasn't carried the Packers to a win this season.. played well but didn't win it.

But one can't say he is the reason we have lost.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

MontanaBob
Registered

16 years ago

#24

Brett had that intangible confidence that carried over to his teammates. It's contagious. Rodgers has not gotten that far yet, and maybe he never will. That is something you can't coach..it is a God-given talent that some have and some don't. And that goes for any profession, not just sports.

Until he arrives at that point, I don't think his teammates nor the team will be more than mediocre. If they can get some players around him next year then maybe it will be different, but I think next year is his last shot at it.

Anyone for a Weenie Roast?

RaiderPride
Senior Member

16 years ago

#25

"MontanaBob" wrote:

You Think.... Next year will be his last shot at it?

Please explain in detail why Bob.

Thanks,

R.P.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

16 years ago

#26

Look -- the kid's got some growing to do. This is his first season as a starter in the NFL, and surprisingly enough, he's got more to learn.

But I really don't know if it's just that everybody's tired of complaining about the defense or what, because I really have a problem with the concept that Aaron's not getting the job done. Again, if he leads the team down the field to a score that puts them up late in the game, isn't it on the D to hold that lead?

And when said D goes out and does its best collective matador impersonation and lets the friggin' Jaguars roll down the field like they're last year's Patriots, then it's on Aaron to do it all again?

And if, surprise surprise, he's not quite able to do that, the onus is on him?

Maybe I'll come off as some sort of Rodgers apologist, and I'm not saying he's anywhere near perfect, but I just don't get this criticism. If he'd come out this season and crapped it up that's one thing -- but he's played well, and other than a couple instances I simply can't blame this team's record on him. I just can't.

blank

brnt247
Registered

16 years ago

#27

Of all the things that Brett Favre did well you're trying to say Rodgers needs to be like him in the 4th quarter? Favre is known by most NFL fans as not being very clutch. I think most of you are just saying things like this just to say them. Favre wasn't a very good 4th quarter QB, he was pretty hit or miss.

blank

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

16 years ago

#28

I apologize for not catching the sarcasm. I had just spent some (ill-advised) time on another Packers forum (http://mbd.scout.com), where they were making that point with dead seriousness, and I overreacted.

Kindly accept a +1 by way of penance.

brnt247
Registered

16 years ago

#29

"RaiderPride" wrote:

You Think.... Next year will be his last shot at it?

Please explain in detail why Bob.

Thanks,

R.P.

"MontanaBob" wrote:

Good thing I don't work for most people on this site. If I made a mistake in my first attempts at the job I'd be shitcanned before I could get to my lunch break...

blank

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

#30

I had no idea Rodgers was a game time decision. .

"DarkaneRules" wrote:

I didn't hear that? this was for yesterdays game?

And props to youCal2

havent heard at all from you and was wondering where ya been

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (4h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (10h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (21h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (21h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS