I suggest you vote for him again. We'll both get back to the subject in 4 years. My best thinking tells me that this president and this administration is driving this country to an unprecedented complete disaster. Your best thinking doesn't see anything of the sort. Vote for him, elect him, whatever...4 more years of all liberals on the executive side, Reid and his crowd running the Senate, 4 more years af a Maxine Waters and her contemporaries with a major voice.

You just go, girls!






We shall see. I will re-visit this 4 years from now.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 

On March 4, 1793, George Washington stood before the assembled worthies in the Senate chamber in Congress Hall in Philadelphia and delivered his second inaugural address, still the shortest inaugural speech on record:

Fellow citizens: I am again called uponby the voice of my country to executethe functions of its Chief Magistrate.When the occasion proper for it shall arrive, I shall endeavor to express the high sense I entertain of this distinguished honor, and of the confidence which has been reposed in me by the people of united America.

Previous to the execution of any official act of the President, the Constitution requires an oath of office. This oath I amnow about to take, and in your presence:That if it shall be found during my administration of the Government I have in any instance violated willingly or knowingly the injunctions thereof, I may (besides incurring constitutional punishment) be subject to the upbraidings of all who are now witnesses of the present solemn ceremony.

Washington’s second inaugural is a model of presidential brevity, but it makes an important point. Fidelity to the constitutional oath of office should be a central factor in judgingpresidents; violation of that oath is just grounds for “upbraiding” them, and more.Unfortunately, our modern political culture treats the oath of office as little more than a ceremonial exercise.

And as Porforis said, it seems that rich liberals (which there are MANY) are the only ones that don't get attacked for being seen as "rich". You don't think THEY use every tax break available??? And can you BLAME them if they DO?
I'm a republican......and trust me, i'm NOT rich. I guess i must be one of the few that arn't rich. (According to all the "conservative haters" out there).

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

I don't assign political bias when I rip on the trust fund babies. And for the life of me Cheesey, I can't understand the thinking of the working poor voting against their economic interests. Voting for people who openly believe in cutting social programs to give tax breaks for the wealthy makes no sense. Please try to explain this to me.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

I think why people assume there is political bias, is than whenever you negatively refer to a specific political party, at least nine times out of ten you're referring to the Republican party.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

Okay, I'm not saying our system is perfect. That's vastly different than saying the system is failing. I think the system can work if it was policed by people with less greed ... be it monetary or power.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

I think close to the entire state of Wisconsin has been completely indoctrinated by the unions and the democratic party since before I was a child in the 50's. I think it has subordinated the entire state's children to a sad state of "HITLER-LIKE" acceptism of the dynamic those teachers and admins chose for the young fools to absorb. There is your Hitler reference.

You Wisconsinites have been totally indoctrinated for at least a half a century, and you don't even friggin' know it.


Friggin' liberal simultaneously arrogant for absolutely no rational reason by any objective criteria provincial bitches. Your law school sucks also, btw. lol, while I'm at it.



It's a fly-over state. You got dairy cows, butter, cheese, the Pack and eccentric people. You got nothin', politically, except a strong rep for being quite whack in the arena. Minnesota makes fun of you because they think they are less fucked up than you are. They are wrong, both are fucked up fly-over states.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf