Porforis
12 years ago

This is against the Facebook Terms of Service and, if discovered, would result in deletion of all accounts created by that person

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I'm sure that'll be one heck of a deterrent.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

Oh my fucking God! If you don't fucking want people to see the shit, DON'T FUCKING PUT IT ON THE INTERNET! And holy fuck, there is a privacy setting you can control the shit too!


Why the fuck can't people do shit for themselves? Everyone needs others to wipe their ass for them?


What's next? Gonna bitch about the brakes in cars not automatically compressing when approaching a Yellow light or Stop sign?


BE FUCKING ACCOUNTABLE FOR YOUR OWN SHIT!


Mark Zuckerberg for President and Larry Page for Vice President!!!
The ticket Zuckerberg/Page!!! VOTE THIS NOVEMBER!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



How many of Facebook's privacy "protections" came only after significant numbers of users took the trouble to give them shit? How many times has Facebook (or Google for that matter) changed the terms of service and required their users to say "don't do that!" again and again?

The Facebook/Google model is basically "we're taking your information unless and until you take affirmative steps to say no. It is not "Can I have this use information?" before taking it. "Ask first" and "ability to opt out" are not the same thing.

The facebook/google approach is to say "we're going to pay attention to how you wipe your ass" until you tell us we shouldn't.

The facebook/google approach is to say "we're going to control your brakes unless you sign an agreement written by lawyers telling us not to.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

How many of Facebook's privacy "protections" came only after significant numbers of users took the trouble to give them shit? How many times has Facebook (or Google for that matter) changed the terms of service and required their users to say "don't do that!" again and again?

The Facebook/Google model is basically "we're taking your information unless and until you take affirmative steps to say no. It is not "Can I have this use information?" before taking it. "Ask first" and "ability to opt out" are not the same thing.

The facebook/google approach is to say "we're going to pay attention to how you wipe your ass" until you tell us we shouldn't.

The facebook/google approach is to say "we're going to control your brakes unless you sign an agreement written by lawyers telling us not to.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



So, you're with me on Zuckerberg for US President, right?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

If someone is representing my company, I don't want an addict, a racist, a child abuser or a freako conspiracy theorist meeting my customers and making people think I agree with that.

If I have a company, I should have a right to have my company represented in a manner consistent with my values. I should have a choice on what kind of people represent me.

It may be their jobs but the company is my life. I should have a right to protect my life.

If their lives and personal activities NEVER intruded on the hours that they are paid for, I wouldn't care what they do. But it always does. Nobody spend 100% of the time they are paid to be at work, doing work. The do personal stuff all the time and they have personal conversation. If they are bringing personal stuff to work, I should have a right to determine if that personal stuff they bring to work is going to harm my business.



Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 


You're right. It's your company. And you should be able to ask a prospective employee anything you want. Agree with that 100%.

If you want to run a security check, bank account check, spending patterns check, have sixteen drug tests, find out what I write on my blog and inside my facebook profile, ask for copies of all the rough drafts of my anarchist babblings, ask what I think of President Moron or Senator Idiot, know what church I go to, feel free.


Personally, I'd rather people who feel as you do ask your questions before I was hired, rather than finding it out after I went to work for you. Then I'm much more likely to get the kind of work situation I want, rather than get there and find out my habits/crazinesses are going to be unacceptable. I'm bothered a lot less by someone who says up front "it matters to me that you're this impolitic anarchist econ whacko, and I don't want you working for me," than someone who says "your personal philosophical and political views don't matter here" and then, after I'm working there, I find they don't just matter, they control."


I hate all this pussyfooting lawyers and HR people and do-gooders have us do in the name of "fair employment practices." Except for certain cases of racial/gender/etc discrimination, employers and employees should be free to associate with each other (or to refuse to associate with each other) however they damn well please and on whatever terms they damn well want to insist upon.

I'm not going to sue you or any prospective employer for asking improper questions. Unless I'm a child or somehow mentally impaired, I don't think there are any improper questions. You're right: it's your business, and you should have the ability to run it any way you please. I've been a small businessman, and I expect I will be again.

Just don't be surprised when I gently refuse to. OR when I loudly tell you to fuck your job and thenspread the word about what kinds of requests you make. Your company's reputation is a function of what your employees do and say. And your reputation is a function of what you do and say.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Cheesey
12 years ago
Zero makes a great point.
If you don't want your info out there, don't put it on the web.
Everything you put on there can be possibly hacked, or used against you.
So if you want to remain private, don't put it out there.

That's one of the biggest problems with the web in my view. WAY too much info is put out there, giving "bad guys" way too easy of access.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago

Everything you put on there can be possibly hacked, or used against you.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


Just because it can be accessed illicitly does not mean that people should have the right to demand access to it.

UserPostedImage
Formo
12 years ago

Just because it can be accessed illicitly does not mean that people should have the right to demand access to it.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Certainly Alan didn't mean that people should get the right to access said information.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
TheKanataThrilla
12 years ago

Directly on the subject though, if this were to become common practice I wonder if people would preemptively set up dummy accounts to paint a flattering picture of themselves for future exploitation. Might be worth the time investment to make yourself look like Mister/Misses responsible.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 


How many friends would that profile have?

[grin1]

Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago

This is against the Facebook Terms of Service and, if discovered, would result in deletion of all accounts created by that person.

And Dexter, how far do you think it is ethical to take such a train of thought? Should you have the right to demand email passwords? Bank account information? Wedding certificates? Access to the snail mail box? Cameras in your employees' homes? Taps on their phones? Where do you draw the line?

If you are worried about their bringing Facebook to work, block access at your place of business. It's easy enough to do. As far as I am concerned, blocking access to a website is the functional equivalent of banning cell phones at work. Demanding Facebook passwords, on the other hand, is the equivalent of demanding the right to monitor an employee's voicemails or view their text messages or contact list. Not acceptable.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I would be worried about them having personal preferences expressed in the execution of their duties and expressing an attitude that is contrary to the way I would want my business portrayed.

It is extremely unrealistic that I would expect people to keep their personal life out of my business. So is it unrealistic for me to want to know what they are bringing in to work? If you never conduct personal business, express personal opinions or engage in social activities when you are at work, then you have a right to keep it a secret. If you do bring it, I have a right to know how you're are going to represent my business.

If people don't bring their personal lives to work, they wouldn't need to know about it. But I do work at Airports, Prisons, Schools and County Courthouses. I can't have a guy with close associations to High Times, a history of inappropriate relationships with minors or who wants to overthrow the Federal Government. I could lose my contracts.

I can't afford not to care what people are into.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago

How many friends would that profile have?

[grin1]

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



All of your friends dummy accounts.:-k
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (2h) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (17h) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (19h) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : pro bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : it was always after the SB.....
beast (10-Feb) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (10-Feb) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : ok now for the Pro Bowl Game in Hawaii
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : If I was Philly I would try to end it instead of punting it
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : VICTORY! We have (moral) victory!
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Hey they mentioned that we 3-peted
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : seems to me the 49ers should have traded Aiyuk when they had the chance
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : if the Eagles get it down to the 1, do they Tush Push or give it to Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : 49ers have a money problem if they want to sign their QB
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Wait for real? Didn't he just get an extension two years ago?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : 49ers gonna trade Deebo. Interesting
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Replays always never seem to show the holdings
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Great throw by Hurts
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Where Carter falls prey to bad off the field influences (to be clear, not saying he'd clip someone though)
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Had Carter not gone to Philly were they already had a lot of old college friends, he ends up in a similar spot to Aaron Hernandez
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : I think some of his coaches told scouts to stay away
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : the street racing incident+conditioning and motivation problems
beast (10-Feb) : Then Carter was street racing, where the other car crashed and people died... and other teams were scared to pick Carter for some reason
beast (10-Feb) : I think the Saints traded up, giving their next year 1st to the Eagles, and then they sucked and Eagles got the 10th overall pick
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : wtf Barkley?
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : Getting Carter and Nolan Smith in the first round in 2023 was pretty darn good
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : for some reason i'm thinking of a draft where the Eagles where in the mid 20s and a top player fell all the way to them
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think so. I would need to look it up. Think it may have been Carolina's pick.
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : i'm not sure who i'm thinking of now
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : oh fuck me i messed that up
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Jordan Davis was 13th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Carter was 9th overall
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles had 15th and 10th selections, moved to 13 and 9 to get Davis and Carter back to back
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Eagles traded up for Carter, didn't they?
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Obviously he was a huge risk but getting a top 5 talent on the dline in the mid 20s is fortuitous
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Jalen Carter falling into their lap certainly helps
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : And we could only wish to have this type of D
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : It's not like Philly has had low draft picks, but has managed to get themselves a top notch pass rush. We spend so much draft capital of D
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : another crap halftime show
TheKanataThrilla (10-Feb) : I think it is over, but then I think of Atlanta and want Philly to go in with the same intensity in the second half
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : And with a Pass Rush that might as well be on a milk cartoon and no Jaire
Martha Careful (10-Feb) : I cant help but feel good about how well the Packers D played in Philly during the playoffs
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : this game is over
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : This might be the kill shot here
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / wpr

20h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

7-Feb / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

1-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.