CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
Right now the Wild Card Games would be
Bears at Saints
Lions at Giants

Good chance the divisional round would be a third game with a divisional opponent.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

1.5. The goal is home field advantage. We should be severely disappointed with anything less.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



2 games.
I am only thinking about winning the division right now. Lock that up first then move on to the first round bye and then the best record in the conference after that. I normally don't begin my climb on the third rung of a ladder.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

2 games.
I am only thinking about winning the division right now. Lock that up first then move on to the first round bye and then the best record in the conference after that. I normally don't begin my climb on the third rung of a ladder.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I do. I have long legs.

Born and bred a cheesehead
CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
Some trivia questions for some of you that follow this thread:

1) What 3 teams have been in playoff position all 7 weeks?
(Hint: 2 NFC, 1 AFC)

2) Which team appeared in playoff position for the first time this week?

3) Which NFC teams made the playoffs last year and have not been in playoff position yet this season?
blank
Dulak
13 years ago
So whom do we have left?

@Chargers - tough game considering our d hasnt stopped many points ... I still dont get why bernett is playing with a broken hand; he wont be getting many interceptions with that hand ...
IMO I see us winning but will be a close one


Vikings - another win; its at home and its the queens


Buccaneers - we win this one


@Lions - my friend back home says we usually lose thanksgiving game vs the lions ... hmmm Id rather not but should be a good game


@Giants - another tough one


Raiders - least we got the raiders at home


@Chiefs - gimnmie game


Bears - I knew I needed something else to do for christmas (all my cousins are bears fans and should be a good game to watch at their house).


Lions - who knows but I say we win



needless to say Im glad we have a lead in our division ... not many gimmie games ... lions on thanksgiving, charges and giants should be fun
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago




@Lions - my friend back home says we usually lose thanksgiving game vs the lions ... hmmm Id rather not but should be a good game

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



I depends how you looks at their record. If you want to include all the games from the 50's they do have a losing record. If you want to look at things in the at 10 years. No they don't. Detroit always plays them tough but GB has still one most of the recent games.

N22, 1951 @ Detroit Lions L 52 -35
N27, 1952 @ Detroit Lions L 48 -24
N26, 1953 @ Detroit Lions L 34 -15
N25, 1954 @ Detroit Lions L 28 -24
N24, 1955 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -10
N22, 1956 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -20
N28, 1957 @ Detroit Lions L 18 -6
N27, 1958 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -14
N26, 1959 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -17
N24, 1960 @ Detroit Lions L 23 -10
N23, 1961 @ Detroit Lions W 17 -9
N22, 1962 @ Detroit Lions L 26 -14
N28, 1963 @ Detroit Lions T 13 -13
N26, 1970 @ Dallas Cowboys L 16 -3
N22, 1984 @ Detroit Lions L 31 -28
N27, 1986 @ Detroit Lions W 44 -40
N24, 1994 @ Dallas Cowboys L 42 -31
N22, 2001 @ Detroit Lions W 29 -27
N27, 2003 @ Detroit Lions L 22 -14
N22, 2007 @ Detroit Lions W 37 -26
N26, 2009 @ Detroit Lions W 34 -12

UserPostedImage
gbguy20
13 years ago

I depends how you looks at their record. If you want to include all the games from the 50's they do have a losing record. If you want to look at things in the at 10 years. No they don't. Detroit always plays them tough but GB has still one most of the recent games.

N22, 1951 @ Detroit Lions L 52 -35
N27, 1952 @ Detroit Lions L 48 -24
N26, 1953 @ Detroit Lions L 34 -15
N25, 1954 @ Detroit Lions L 28 -24
N24, 1955 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -10
N22, 1956 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -20
N28, 1957 @ Detroit Lions L 18 -6
N27, 1958 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -14
N26, 1959 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -17
N24, 1960 @ Detroit Lions L 23 -10
N23, 1961 @ Detroit Lions W 17 -9
N22, 1962 @ Detroit Lions L 26 -14
N28, 1963 @ Detroit Lions T 13 -13
N26, 1970 @ Dallas Cowboys L 16 -3
N22, 1984 @ Detroit Lions L 31 -28
N27, 1986 @ Detroit Lions W 44 -40
N24, 1994 @ Dallas Cowboys L 42 -31
N22, 2001 @ Detroit Lions W 29 -27
N27, 2003 @ Detroit Lions L 22 -14
N22, 2007 @ Detroit Lions W 37 -26
N26, 2009 @ Detroit Lions W 34 -12

Originally Posted by: wpr 




didn't we play them on thanksgiving last year? i really hope my memory isnt that bad.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

didn't we play them on thanksgiving last year? i really hope my memory isnt that bad.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 


sorry, Detroit played New England
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

True, although it is a rare Super Bowl that features both Number 1 seeds. I did the math last year (I'd have to dig up the thread). If I remember correctly, only 13% of Super Bowls have featured two Number 1 seeds. I created that thread to point out that even though they were a Number 6, there was still hope for the Packers, since there was an 87% chance that both Number 1 seeds wouldn't make it past the second weekend.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I did a quick check of seeds making the Super Bowl going back to 1978, the first season there was a wild card round. While the top seed in each conference meet in only 7 of the 33 Super Bowls (21.2%), at least 1 top seed made the Super Bowl in 29 of 33 years (87.9%). Granted it's been more common as of late for lower seeds to make it. Being a number 1 seed is still a huge advantage. For the record, each of the four seasons in which a number 1 did not make it, a number 2 did.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

there was an 87% chance that both Number 1 seeds wouldn't make it past the second weekend.

Nonstopdrivel wrote:



There is a syntactical ambiguity to my statement, which could be interpreted as saying that it was likely that neither Number 1 seed would make it to the Super Bowl. What I meant to say is that there was an 87 percent chance that the Super Bowl would feature either one or no Number 1 seed. In other words, there was only a 13 percent chance that both top seeds would be in the Super Bowl.

It is very common that a Super Bowl features a Number 1 seed. It is quite rare that it features both Number 1 seeds. That pattern held true this year as well.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (19h) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : What?
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.