CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
NFC

First Round Bye
1) Packers (1) (Better record than anyone)
2) 49'ers (2) (Winning % 5-1 > Saints 5-2)

Division Winners
3) Saints (6) (Winning % 5-2 > Giants 4-2)
4) Giants (4) (Winning % 4-2 > Cowboys 3-3)

Wild Cards
5) Lions (5) (winning % 5-2 > Bears 4-3)
6) Bears (8) (Head to head win over Buccaneers)

The Rest in Order:
7) Buccaneers (3) (Head to head win over Falcons)
8) Falcons (9) (Winning % 4-3 > Cowboys 3-3)
9) Cowboys (10) (Head to head win over Redskins)
10) Redskins (7) (Winning % 3-3 > Seahawks 2-4)
11) Seahawks (11) (Conference % 2-2 > Eagles 2-3)
12) Eagles (12) (Winning % 2-4 > Panthers 2-5)
13) Panthers (15)(Winning % 2-5 > Cardinals 1-5)
14) Cardinals (13) (Winning % 1-5 > vikings 1-6)
15) vikings (14) (Winning % 1-6 > Rams 0-6)
16) Rams (16)


AFC

First Round Bye
1) Patriots (1) (Winning % 5-1 > Steelers 5-2)
2) Steelers (8) (Winning % 5-2 > Chargers 4-2)

Division Winners
3) Chargers (3) (Winning % 4-2 > Texans 4-3)
4) Texans (9)

Wild Cards
5) Bengals (5) (Head to head win over Bills)
6) Bills (6) (Conf % 3-1 > Ravens 3-2)

The rest in order:
7) Ravens (2) (Conf % 3-2 > Raiders 4-3)
8) Raiders (7) (Conf % 4-3 > Jets 3-3)
9) Jets (10) (Winning % 4-3 > Titans 3-3)
10) Titans (4) (SOV .500 > Chiefs .238)
11) Chiefs (12) (Conf % 2-2 > Browns 2-3)
12) Browns (11) (Winning % 3-3 > Broncos 2-4)
13) Broncos (13) (Winning % 2-4 > Jaguars 2-5)
14) Jaguars (14) (Winning % 2-5 > 0-7 Colts)
15) Colts (16) (SOS .605 > Dolphins .579)
16) Dolphins (15)


Notes:
49'ers lost no ground during their bye week.
3 Playoff teams in the NFC North
The Packers will still be the #1 Team next week regardless of results.
The Packers have won 6 of 12 conference games.
49'ers, Lions, Bears and Falcons have won 4.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
It is nice to have a 2 game cushion at this point in the season.
UserPostedImage
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
It's even better to have a 2 game cushion at the end of the season.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
This is true. I would be even better still to have a 5 10 year steak of winning the SB.
I has not trying to say what is the best. Just that as of right now it is great to have a little cushion.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
13 years ago

This is true. I would be even better still to have a 5 10 year steak of winning the SB.
I has not trying to say what is the best. Just that as of right now it is great to have a little cushion.

Originally Posted by: wpr 




heh, I kind of had the same thought when reading that response.
mi_keys
13 years ago

It is nice to have a 2 game cushion at this point in the season.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



1.5. The goal is home field advantage. We should be severely disappointed with anything less.
Born and bred a cheesehead
evad04
13 years ago

1.5. The goal is home field advantage. We should be severely disappointed with anything less.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 


I understand the sentiment here, but it doesn't jive with me. We should be severely disappointed if the Pack don't make the playoffs. We should be slightly disappointed if they don't get a 1st round bye. We should be mildly disappointed if they don't get home field throughout the playoffs.

Atlanta had the NFC's best record -- and with it, home field advantage. How'd that play out for them? All that matters is making it to the tournament, like we barely did last year.

At this point the only thing I surmise could keep us out of the playoffs is an injury to Rodgers. But that isn't gonna happen, because he needs to see through his first MVP season.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

But that isn't gonna happen, because he needs to see through his first MVP season.

Originally Posted by: evad04 


Wow, now there is a non sequitur if I ever saw one!šŸ˜

At 7-0 the Packers are currently up 2.5 games on the Giants, 2 games on the Lions and Saints, and 1.5 games on the 49ers. They are up 3 games on Bears and Falcons. The Packers only need to go 5-4 the rest of the way to hit 12-4, while the Giants need to go 8-2, the Lions and Saints need to go 7-2, and the 49ers need to go 7-3. I don't see the Giants or the Lions going on that kind of run. The Saints probably have the firepower to do it, but I think it's unlikely that they will sustain their level of early-season success. The only other team I see having a legitimate chance at hitting 12-4 without a whole lot of luck and/or outside help is the 49ers, who still have 5 games to play in the extraordinarily impotent NFC West.

Thus it is likely that 12-4 will secure at a minimum a first-round bye and more likely homefield advantage throughout. Absent a catastrophic late-season collapse, I think the Packers are well positioned to attain either or both milestones.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

I understand the sentiment here, but it doesn't jive with me. We should be severely disappointed if the Pack don't make the playoffs. We should be slightly disappointed if they don't get a 1st round bye. We should be mildly disappointed if they don't get home field throughout the playoffs.

Atlanta had the NFC's best record -- and with it, home field advantage. How'd that play out for them? All that matters is making it to the tournament, like we barely did last year.

At this point the only thing I surmise could keep us out of the playoffs is an injury to Rodgers. But that isn't gonna happen, because he needs to see through his first MVP season.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



Number 1 seeds generally do a little bit better than they did last year. In fact, we're less than two years removed from a Super Bowl that featured two number 1 seeds. 4 Number 1 seeds have made the Super Bowl in the last 5 years.

We're 16-3 at home since the beginning of 2009 and have won 8 straight in Lambeau since we lost in overtime to Miami. I'm not worried about the cold weather either. I've pulled up the stats before and Rodgers passing in outdoor games late in the year were statistically no different than his career averages (until he upped his game this year). He can probably handle the bad weather better than just about anyone. We're also 8-2 in our last 10 games following a bye. Being the number 1 seed would be a boost to our chances of repeating.

I also look at our remaining schedule and who might compete with us for the top seed. 6-3 from here on out should be very attainable. In my opinion that should be the absolute minimum. If that's the case, New Orleans or Tampa Bay have to win out to pass us and Tampa has to go to Green Bay and New Orleans still. If we beat the Giants then either the Cowboys or Redskins would have to win out and beat us on some non-head-to-head tiebreaker. That leaves San Francisco as the only other team with a shot at 13-3 or better, which they might do considering how shit their schedule is and how resilient they've been. All that considered, I'll be disappointed if we don't get home field advantage.

That said, if we finish 10-6 as a wild card and win the Super Bowl, I won't care one lick that we didn't get home field advantage.


...this of course does not take into account how injuries might pan out.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

4 Number 1 seeds have made the Super Bowl in the last 5 years.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 


True, although it is a rare Super Bowl that features both Number 1 seeds. I did the math last year (I'd have to dig up the thread). If I remember correctly, only 13% of Super Bowls have featured two Number 1 seeds. I created that thread to point out that even though they were a Number 6, there was still hope for the Packers, since there was an 87% chance that both Number 1 seeds wouldn't make it past the second weekend.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (15h) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (15h) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (22h) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (22h) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 šŸ˜”
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
8h / Around The NFL / packerfanoutwest

16h / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

10-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.