CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
Right now the Wild Card Games would be
Bears at Saints
Lions at Giants

Good chance the divisional round would be a third game with a divisional opponent.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

1.5. The goal is home field advantage. We should be severely disappointed with anything less.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



2 games.
I am only thinking about winning the division right now. Lock that up first then move on to the first round bye and then the best record in the conference after that. I normally don't begin my climb on the third rung of a ladder.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

2 games.
I am only thinking about winning the division right now. Lock that up first then move on to the first round bye and then the best record in the conference after that. I normally don't begin my climb on the third rung of a ladder.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I do. I have long legs.

Born and bred a cheesehead
CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
Some trivia questions for some of you that follow this thread:

1) What 3 teams have been in playoff position all 7 weeks?
(Hint: 2 NFC, 1 AFC)

2) Which team appeared in playoff position for the first time this week?

3) Which NFC teams made the playoffs last year and have not been in playoff position yet this season?
blank
Dulak
13 years ago
So whom do we have left?

@Chargers - tough game considering our d hasnt stopped many points ... I still dont get why bernett is playing with a broken hand; he wont be getting many interceptions with that hand ...
IMO I see us winning but will be a close one


Vikings - another win; its at home and its the queens


Buccaneers - we win this one


@Lions - my friend back home says we usually lose thanksgiving game vs the lions ... hmmm Id rather not but should be a good game


@Giants - another tough one


Raiders - least we got the raiders at home


@Chiefs - gimnmie game


Bears - I knew I needed something else to do for christmas (all my cousins are bears fans and should be a good game to watch at their house).


Lions - who knows but I say we win



needless to say Im glad we have a lead in our division ... not many gimmie games ... lions on thanksgiving, charges and giants should be fun
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago




@Lions - my friend back home says we usually lose thanksgiving game vs the lions ... hmmm Id rather not but should be a good game

Originally Posted by: Dulak 



I depends how you looks at their record. If you want to include all the games from the 50's they do have a losing record. If you want to look at things in the at 10 years. No they don't. Detroit always plays them tough but GB has still one most of the recent games.

N22, 1951 @ Detroit Lions L 52 -35
N27, 1952 @ Detroit Lions L 48 -24
N26, 1953 @ Detroit Lions L 34 -15
N25, 1954 @ Detroit Lions L 28 -24
N24, 1955 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -10
N22, 1956 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -20
N28, 1957 @ Detroit Lions L 18 -6
N27, 1958 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -14
N26, 1959 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -17
N24, 1960 @ Detroit Lions L 23 -10
N23, 1961 @ Detroit Lions W 17 -9
N22, 1962 @ Detroit Lions L 26 -14
N28, 1963 @ Detroit Lions T 13 -13
N26, 1970 @ Dallas Cowboys L 16 -3
N22, 1984 @ Detroit Lions L 31 -28
N27, 1986 @ Detroit Lions W 44 -40
N24, 1994 @ Dallas Cowboys L 42 -31
N22, 2001 @ Detroit Lions W 29 -27
N27, 2003 @ Detroit Lions L 22 -14
N22, 2007 @ Detroit Lions W 37 -26
N26, 2009 @ Detroit Lions W 34 -12

UserPostedImage
gbguy20
13 years ago

I depends how you looks at their record. If you want to include all the games from the 50's they do have a losing record. If you want to look at things in the at 10 years. No they don't. Detroit always plays them tough but GB has still one most of the recent games.

N22, 1951 @ Detroit Lions L 52 -35
N27, 1952 @ Detroit Lions L 48 -24
N26, 1953 @ Detroit Lions L 34 -15
N25, 1954 @ Detroit Lions L 28 -24
N24, 1955 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -10
N22, 1956 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -20
N28, 1957 @ Detroit Lions L 18 -6
N27, 1958 @ Detroit Lions L 24 -14
N26, 1959 @ Detroit Lions W 24 -17
N24, 1960 @ Detroit Lions L 23 -10
N23, 1961 @ Detroit Lions W 17 -9
N22, 1962 @ Detroit Lions L 26 -14
N28, 1963 @ Detroit Lions T 13 -13
N26, 1970 @ Dallas Cowboys L 16 -3
N22, 1984 @ Detroit Lions L 31 -28
N27, 1986 @ Detroit Lions W 44 -40
N24, 1994 @ Dallas Cowboys L 42 -31
N22, 2001 @ Detroit Lions W 29 -27
N27, 2003 @ Detroit Lions L 22 -14
N22, 2007 @ Detroit Lions W 37 -26
N26, 2009 @ Detroit Lions W 34 -12

Originally Posted by: wpr 




didn't we play them on thanksgiving last year? i really hope my memory isnt that bad.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

didn't we play them on thanksgiving last year? i really hope my memory isnt that bad.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 


sorry, Detroit played New England
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
13 years ago

True, although it is a rare Super Bowl that features both Number 1 seeds. I did the math last year (I'd have to dig up the thread). If I remember correctly, only 13% of Super Bowls have featured two Number 1 seeds. I created that thread to point out that even though they were a Number 6, there was still hope for the Packers, since there was an 87% chance that both Number 1 seeds wouldn't make it past the second weekend.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I did a quick check of seeds making the Super Bowl going back to 1978, the first season there was a wild card round. While the top seed in each conference meet in only 7 of the 33 Super Bowls (21.2%), at least 1 top seed made the Super Bowl in 29 of 33 years (87.9%). Granted it's been more common as of late for lower seeds to make it. Being a number 1 seed is still a huge advantage. For the record, each of the four seasons in which a number 1 did not make it, a number 2 did.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

there was an 87% chance that both Number 1 seeds wouldn't make it past the second weekend.

Nonstopdrivel wrote:



There is a syntactical ambiguity to my statement, which could be interpreted as saying that it was likely that neither Number 1 seed would make it to the Super Bowl. What I meant to say is that there was an 87 percent chance that the Super Bowl would feature either one or no Number 1 seed. In other words, there was only a 13 percent chance that both top seeds would be in the Super Bowl.

It is very common that a Super Bowl features a Number 1 seed. It is quite rare that it features both Number 1 seeds. That pattern held true this year as well.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (15h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (15h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Rude!
beast (19h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (23h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

15h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.