Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Not to mention that have a pretty darn good rushing attack to rely on. Or at worse, better than ours. Also, Sproles can't seem to be stopped in the passing game. Our LBs sure as hell can't cover him.

Originally Posted by: doddpower 



I wonder what would happen if they had Woodson shadowing Sproles? Woodson's best play this year has been where he's been playing rover/LB-type things.

Personally I think the big problem for the Packers with NO is going to be Graham. They haven't stopped a good TE all year, if I recall.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
RainX
13 years ago
With our porous D, getting HFA is pretty key imo to have a good chance to repeat. Right now, the Packers are going to be sitting home a lot. Outside of a short flight to KC, there's a pretty good chance every other game the rest of the way will be in Lambeau until the SB.

SF and NO will probably matchup in the divisional round and they will knock each other around a bit. Packers will need to worry about the winner of the 4/5 game and could draw a tough opponent in the Giants again if they win the NFC East.

Getting NO in Green Bay is huge because the Saints aren't exactly a warm weather team. They didn't necessarily fair well in 2006 when they went to Chicago for the NFC Championship Game when a lot of people picked them to beat the Bears that season. Green Bay will be well adjusted to playing in the cold the next several weeks and that bodes well for their chances going forward.
blank
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

I wonder what would happen if they had Woodson shadowing Sproles? Woodson's best play this year has been where he's been playing rover/LB-type things.

Personally I think the big problem for the Packers with NO is going to be Graham. They haven't stopped a good TE all year, if I recall.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



I think Charles Woodson has his best games when he's blitzing and attacking more.
UserPostedImage
CaliforniaCheez
13 years ago
The Packers have clinched the #3 playoff spot.
The 49'ers have clinched the #4 playoff spot.
Although close, the Saints have not yet clinched a playoff spot.
One more Packers win or one more Saints loss and the Packers clinch a first round bye (#2 playoff spot).

Currently
Packers 12-0, Conference 10-0, Strength of Victory .426, Strength of Schedule .426
49'ers 10-2, Conference 8-1, Strength of Victory .400, Strength of Schedule .444
The Packers and 49'ers have 3 common games and both are 3-0 so common games will not be a tiebreaker.

Saints 9-3, Conference 6-3, Packers have head to head tiebreaker, SOV .438, SOS .453
In common games with the Packers the Saints lost to the Rams and are .500 with the Buccaneers. The Packers win that tiebreaker.

blank
Dulak
13 years ago

With our porous D, getting HFA is pretty key imo to have a good chance to repeat. Right now, the Packers are going to be sitting home a lot. Outside of a short flight to KC, there's a pretty good chance every other game the rest of the way will be in Lambeau until the SB.

SF and NO will probably matchup in the divisional round and they will knock each other around a bit. Packers will need to worry about the winner of the 4/5 game and could draw a tough opponent in the Giants again if they win the NFC East.

Getting NO in Green Bay is huge because the Saints aren't exactly a warm weather team. They didn't necessarily fair well in 2006 when they went to Chicago for the NFC Championship Game when a lot of people picked them to beat the Bears that season. Green Bay will be well adjusted to playing in the cold the next several weeks and that bodes well for their chances going forward.

Originally Posted by: RainX 



the packers schedule for the rest of the year bodes well ... 3 games at home with teams that are beat up. Well the lions arnt exactly buy the packers can relax more ...

Be interesting to see how the playoffs work out ... I do agree the saints will be tougher to beat and am hoping the niners and saints go head to head be for a good game.

Cant believe last game - was a close one. Giants D sure was tough ... made our front 7 look a bit porous.
DakotaT
13 years ago


Cant believe last game - was a close one. Giants D sure was tough ... made our front 7 look a bit porous.

Originally Posted by: Dulak 




Next time Clifton and Sitton will be playing, so I'm not terribly worried.
UserPostedImage
beast
13 years ago

I think the Saints very well could beat the Packers... but they'll have to get through the 49ers on the road first. And I think the 49ers are very under rated but the match-ups just don't favor them... at least not if Clifton get back 100% ... with Newhouse he might have some trouble but the Packers still have been able to adjust for that.

As for the rest of the season games I think the question is will the Packers be going 100% against the Bears and Lions? If not then they could lose...

Also the match-up favor the Lions as long as they have everyone... the Packers didn't do so well until Suh got kicked out...


NFL.com says the Texans currently are the #2 seed for some reason... but I'm not sure why... I think CaliforniaCheez did it right from what I understood.

http://www.nfl.com/playoffs/playoff-picture 


NFC
AFC

First Round Bye
1) Patriots (2) (Conference win % .778 > Ravens .750)
2) Ravens (3) (Head to head win over Texans and Steelers)

Division Winners
3) Texans (1) (Winning % .750 > Broncos .583)

Originally Posted by: CaliforniaCheez 




UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

NFL.com says the Texans currently are the #2 seed for some reason... but I'm not sure why... I think CaliforniaCheez did it right from what I understood.

http://www.nfl.com/playoffs/playoff-picture 

Originally Posted by: beast 



I was about to say CaliforniaCheez is correct, until I seen that the Texans have a better Conference record. So, Texans (7 - 2) are above Ravens (6 - 2).
UserPostedImage
Dulak
13 years ago

Next time Clifton and Sitton will be playing, so I'm not terribly worried.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Great to hear! Newhouse is doing ok filling in but he sure gets man handeled by these top pass rushers.
beast
13 years ago

I was about to say CaliforniaCheez is correct, until I seen that the Texans have a better Conference record. So, Texans (7 - 2) are above Ravens (6 - 2).

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



CaliforniaCheez is correct ... NFL.com got it wrong and I think have corrected their mistake. Ravens beat the Texans so in the head to head match-up the Ravens go first.

Also I think I read the Steelers are leading now... but that's just because they won on Thursday and the other have yet to play this week.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (11h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (11h) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Oh, it's toe injury
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
    dfosterf (15h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
    dfosterf (15h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
    Zero2Cool (15h) : He's on Browns, right?
    dfosterf (15h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
    dfosterf (15h) : Fleece 'em again!
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
    packerfanoutwest (16h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    18m / Around The NFL / beast

    10h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    23h / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.