Offensive stats · PACKERSHOME

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Passing
Player......... Att ....Comp... Yds ....Comp %. Yds/Att ........TD .....TD% ....INT ....INT% ...Long... Sck ... Sack/Lost ..... Rating

Aaron Rodgers 180 ......129....1,721...71.7.........9.6 ..............14 .... 7.8 ........2 ......... 1.1 .......84 ......... 11 ......73 ...............122.9
Matt Flynn 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 -- 0 0 0.0

Rushing
Player ............Att.....Yds ..Yds/Att ..Long ..TD

James Starks .....57 ....250 ....4.4 ....40 .... 1
Ryan Grant ....... 39 ...175 ....4.5 .... 14 .... 0
Aaron Rodgers ...20 .....52 ... 2.6 .... 11 .... 2
John Kuhn ......... 4 ...... 9 ... 2.3 ..... 4 ..... 2
Alex Green .........3 ..... 11 ... 3.7 ..... 8 .... 0
Matt Flynn ......... 2 .... -2 ... -1.0 .....-1 .... 0

Receiving
Player............... Rec ...Yds ....Yds/Rec ....Long ... TD

Greg Jennings ..... 29 ...448 ..... 15.4 ....... 49 ........ 4
Jermichael Finley ..22 ...301 ..... 13.7 ....... 39 ........ 3
Jordy Nelson ....... 18 ...309 ..... 17.2 ....... 84 ........ 3
James Jones ....... 14 ...228 ..... 16.3 ....... 70 .........2
James Starks ...... 13 ... 96 ....... 7.4 ....... 16 ......... 0
Randall Cobb ....... 9 ...174 ...... 19.3 ....... 61 ........ 1
Donald Driver ...... 9 ... 76 ....... 8.4 ........ 16 ......... 1
John Kuhn .......... 6 ... 32 ........ 5.3 ......... 7.......... 0
Ryan Grant ......... 5 ... 25 .........5.0 ......... 8 ......... 0
Tom Crabtree .......2 ....19 ........ 9.5 ........ 15 ........ 0
Alex Green .......... 1 .... 6 ......... 6.0 ......... 6 ......... 0
D.J. Williams ....... 1 .... 7 ......... 7.0 ......... 7 ......... 0

I find my self wondering who has the better stats between Starks and Grant. Nelson and Jones. Cobb and Driver. All the extra TE's. So I thought I would post them here.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Packers_Finland
Registered

13 years ago

Show Spoiler

Grades courtesy of ProFootballFocus.

These cumulative grades do not yet hold grades from the Falcons game. Picture will be updated once that happens.

This is a placeholder

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Grades courtesy of ProFootballFocus.

Originally Posted by: Packers_Finland

nice addition.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

Nice addition, wpr. Just a hint: if you enclose your tables in one of the tags accessible with the

button, you don't have to use dots to maintain the columns, because it uses a fixed-width font. You can just type up your tables in a plain text editor (like Notepad), using the spacebar to line things up, and then paste it into your post.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

Thank you WPR.

It's looking like my man DD's stats have really dropped off. With Jordy & JJ both getting good contracts, DD might be asked to retire at the end of the year, especially with the development of Cobb.

Of course I don't want to see it happening but numbers don't lie. 😞

He's averaging less than 12 yards per game receiving.

The biggest surprise to me is Jordy Nelson. I'd be the first to admit I'm wrong. I was wrong about Jordy. I thought he'd never amount to anything more than a pretty good #3 WR. I'm glad I was wrong. I thought it would go Gregorious, JJ, Jordy. Instead, it's quickly becoming Gregorious, Jordy, JJ, and then Cobb.

Cobb will more than likely rise up in value. Cobb in the open field is dangerous. He reminds me so much of Percy Harvin.

Yes, this is only after 5 games and we got 14 more to play (well, 11 regular season games to go). So things can change by the end of the year. If my man DD gets 600+ receiving yards by the end of the year, then I'm guessing he'll play in 2012. 🇹🇹 will still draft a WR in 2012 because that's just what 🇹🇹 does.

🇹🇹 still has nightmares of 2005. Did you see the worried look on his face against the Falcons? That wasn't because he was worried about the Falcons game. That was because last night he had a nightmare of 2005.

A little side note, did anyone notice that 50% of Kuhn's rushes are TDs?

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

A little side note, did anyone notice that 50% of Kuhn's rushes are TDs?

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Yep. Kuhn is our new Ruvell Martin.

macbob
Veteran Member

13 years ago

A little side note, did anyone notice that 50% of Kuhn's rushes are TDs?

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Well, shoot--we obviously need to be handing it off to Kuhn more often, then... [grin1]

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Nice addition, wpr. Just a hint: if you enclose your tables in one of the tags accessible with the button, you don't have to use dots to maintain the columns, because it uses a fixed-width font. You can just type up your tables in a plain text editor (like Notepad), using the spacebar to line things up, and then paste it into your post.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Thanks. The ..... was a pain in my viking I mean butt but I repeat myself. I tried using "code" and that didn't work.

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Yep. I am very disappointed in Donald's production this year. Those that called for him to be cut from the team are closer to being correct. I contended that his numbers would be back in that 600 range. I also though he would get the big 3rd down receptions over the middle. After dropping one yesterday I am thinking he will not get as many of them as I said he would.

With that said I still feel he is a positive influence on the young receiving corp and worth a roster spot this year. Before game 1 I thought he may be back in 2012 at a reduced price. Now I would like to see one of those youngsters who normally end up on the PS get the chance to develop. Next year..... will have to take care of itself.

But as you said, we are only thru 5 games. Who knows what will happen.

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#10

Yep. I am very disappointed in Donald's production this year. Those that called for him to be cut from the team are closer to being correct.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Nerd, Non, and I are always around for our expert advice and vast knowledge of all things. =d>

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (6m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (7m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (59m) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (59m) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (1h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (1h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (1h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (2h) : Packers will get in

beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (3h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (18h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS