Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Nerd, Non, and I are always around for our expert advice and vast knowledge of all things. =d>

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 


Thus such short conversations.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago

Thus such short conversations.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



The truly intellectual have no need for essay long verbal/written masturbation. It is not worthy of the time spent.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

The truly intellectual have no need for essay long verbal/written masturbation. It is not worthy of the time spent.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I used less words to make my point. 🙂
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
In all fairness to Donald Driver, I don't think any of the receivers cut in the preseason would have had significantly higher production than he has had thus far. Heck, Rodgers hit 12 different receivers this week alone. But that was basically my point all along. Since it was likely that Driver would slide steadily down the real depth chart (albeit not the official one), why not give one of our other young guys a chance? The rookie would be significantly cheaper, and retaining him would prevent his being signed by another team. As Randall Cobb proved, a rookie can step in and contribute his first day. A Gurley or West might not have lit the world on fire, but it's doubtful his production would have been significantly lower than Driver's either.

Overall, the production of our receivers individually is probably going to decline this year, simply because there are so many people to throw to. I think that's a good thing. I would rather have eight receivers with 500 yards than one receiver with 1800 yards and seven others with 300 yards apiece.
UserPostedImage
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
The Packer's hand may be forced next year. We have some important players to sign so we can use the money DD is making to help with that cause. I like DD but I think it is getting "time".
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

In all fairness to Donald Driver, I don't think any of the receivers cut in the preseason would have had significantly higher production than he has had thus far. Heck, Rodgers hit 12 different receivers this week alone. But that was basically my point all along. Since it was likely that Driver would slide steadily down the real depth chart (albeit not the official one), why not give one of our other young guys a chance? The rookie would be significantly cheaper, and retaining him would prevent his being signed by another team. As Randall Cobb proved, a rookie can step in and contribute his first day. A Gurley or West might not have lit the world on fire, but it's doubtful his production would have been significantly lower than Driver's either.

Overall, the production of our receivers individually is probably going to decline this year, simply because there are so many people to throw to. I think that's a good thing. I would rather have eight receivers with 500 yards than one receiver with 1800 yards and seven others with 300 yards apiece.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I respected your opinion then and now.
I felt the slip was due to injury not age and that he would bounce back and put up numbers similar to what Jordy has done this year. West & Co most likely would not have done that this year. Unfortunately it does not appear that he will. But it is only week 5. JJ had a breakout game this past week. there is still hope for Donald to have his big game too.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Nice addition, wpr. Just a hint: if you enclose your tables in one of the tags accessible with the UserPostedImage button, you don't have to use dots to maintain the columns, because it uses a fixed-width font. You can just type up your tables in a plain text editor (like Notepad), using the spacebar to line things up, and then paste it into your post.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 




I used the link for the defensive stats. It does make a cleaner post. Like I said I typed the "code][/code] words but I didn't go tot he drop down box and it was a mess.
Maybe one of the other formats will do it but the first one or two wouldn't let me bold any of the lines. Something for me to work on in the future.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

In all fairness to Donald Driver, I don't think any of the receivers cut in the preseason would have had significantly higher production than he has had thus far. Heck, Rodgers hit 12 different receivers this week alone. But that was basically my point all along. Since it was likely that Driver would slide steadily down the real depth chart (albeit not the official one), why not give one of our other young guys a chance? The rookie would be significantly cheaper, and retaining him would prevent his being signed by another team. As Randall Cobb proved, a rookie can step in and contribute his first day. A Gurley or West might not have lit the world on fire, but it's doubtful his production would have been significantly lower than Driver's either.

Overall, the production of our receivers individually is probably going to decline this year, simply because there are so many people to throw to. I think that's a good thing. I would rather have eight receivers with 500 yards than one receiver with 1800 yards and seven others with 300 yards apiece.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Cobb is no normal rookie. He was his college team's entire O when he played in college.

Most rookie WRs suck, even WRs who go on to be pretty damn good WRs. WRs take longer to develop than other positions. Can you think of any NFL team that has a starting rookie WR by choice (I mean,not due to injury)?
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
earthquake
13 years ago
Atlanta has a starting rookie WR by choice, but yeah, I agree with your point. Generally top 15 WR's start, but other than that, not so much.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
I thought it was obvious from my post that I wasn't anticipating a Gurley or West would be a starter. Fifth on the depth chart was my expectation. 😝
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (22m) : RIP Junior Bridgeman. An excellent businessman and NBA er
Zero2Cool (2h) : It's better to have $17m to use on players who will be on the field. That's why trade/release is talked
Zero2Cool (2h) : post june is $7m cap hit with $17m saving
Zero2Cool (2h) : oops meant $10m cap hit
Zero2Cool (2h) : And pre june is $10m savings
Zero2Cool (2h) : Can't make him play.
dhazer (2h) : I am curious why the big need to release Jaire, we have 29 million cap space we arent spending and would only gain $6 million/ make him play
Zero2Cool (3h) : Joey Bosa signed with Bills?
dfosterf (3h) : What they are offering is a left over case of Leinies from the Chippewa Falls plant
Zero2Cool (3h) : 27, 59, 91, 129 gets you Jaire and our 3rd
Zero2Cool (3h) : they give us those five, or even first four, they can have Jaire.
Zero2Cool (3h) : 27, 59, 91, 129 and 136 are only ones worth having of theirs.
dfosterf (4h) : What they don't have is cap space, at least presently at 5.6 mil
dfosterf (4h) : Poor bastards only have 11
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ravens ain't got crap for picks.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Aaron Rodgers is choosing between Steelers and Giants. The Vikings are officially out on him, per RapSheet
dfosterf (4h) : Current cap space 29.6 million.
dfosterf (4h) : Hobbs 2025 cap hit just under 6 million. Banks 2025 cap hit just over 9 million
Mucky Tundra (11h) : beast, this is news to me! Tell me more about these, "draft picks." They seem mighty mysterious! 😉
beast (13h) : Yes, the Ravens have draft picks
dfosterf (14h) : Good luck to him.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Eric Stokes signs with Raiders
Martha Careful (16h) : Tyler Linderbaum C
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Cap space?
Zero2Cool (16h) : Do Ravens have anything we'd even entertain to have?
Mucky Tundra (18h) : I've seen trade ideas of Jaire going to the Ravens all offseason
beast (19h) : A probably false rumor is suggesting CB Jaire Alexander is being traded to the Ravens, again probably false
beast (19h) : Commanders might have a dominant offense the next 3 years at least
Zero2Cool (21h) : San Francisco 49ers announced they have released DL Leonard Floyd.
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Er getting traded twice like that
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Huh, LT Laremy Tunsil traded from Houston to Washington. Never heard of a top OT getting traded in his career like that
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : Minnesota Vikings cornerback Byron Murphy Jr. is returning on a three-year, $66 million deal
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : Damn
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : Saints are re-signing DE Chase Young to a three-year, $51 million deal worth up to $57 million.
Martha Careful (11-Mar) : 49ers releasing FB Juszcyk any interest?
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : digits of four
Zero2Cool (11-Mar) : four digits
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : Eh, don't think so. better to split
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : on new site, would Fan Shout and GameDay Chat show same messages?
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : The Hall of Fame stuff probably came from a scout as Zero said; at this point though it's hard to see them moving ZT from RT
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : Regarding ZT at C, Gute had said he felt C was ZTs best position after he was drafted.
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : LB Oren Burks to sign a 2-year, $5M deal with the Bengals.
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : Based on how it was worded at the time, probably scout.
beast (10-Mar) : I don't think the media person ever told the public the source, but Gute or LaFleur did say they thought Tom has earned his spot at OT
beast (10-Mar) : I think it was supposedly unnamed Packers source
buckeyepackfan (10-Mar) : Was that Gute or Lefleur or someone else?
buckeyepackfan (10-Mar) : Zach Tom could be a really good guard, an all pro tackle, but probably be a HOF Center. Who said that?
Zero2Cool (10-Mar) : It's March 10th. I don't think anything is done.
Martha Careful (10-Mar) : if we think CB is done, we have a poor roster
Mucky Tundra (10-Mar) : CB and OG in FA, narrows down the top of the draft board a little
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
39m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

10-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

1-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.