2011 Starks v Grant: week 1· Page 8

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

Do you think Green will start to get some of Grant's carries by the end of the year?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

nope. he will get his own.

GB had a 100 + yards rushing in their first game. Rodgers did not have to factor into the total in a significant way. It is all good.

El3ment12
Registered

13 years ago

#72

Something I noticed about Starks is that he makes it look so easy to get like 8+ yards a carry.

peteralan71
Registered

13 years ago

#73

Something I noticed about Starks is that he makes it look so easy to get like 8+ yards a carry.

Originally Posted by: El3ment380

He always gets an extra 2 yards by falling forward. He consistently keeps his center of mass moving forward and plays lower than Grant. We're in a great position for the future.

Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#74

Something I noticed about Starks is that he makes it look so easy to get like 8+ yards a carry.

Originally Posted by: El3ment380

I noticed that too. Imo, it's because he's awesome!

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

earthquake
Member

13 years ago

#75

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

blank

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#76

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

I LIKE IT!!! =d>

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#77

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Exactly what I was saying earlier.

Getting rid of one of them IS STUPID. I said this before the season started. Starks breaks tackles. Grant avoids them. BOTH STYLES ARE GOOD.

Throughout the year, both RBs will have good games and both will falter, depending on the matchups. Here's to hoping both play 19 games.

I don't like the idea of relying on one RB in today's NFL. It's stupid. If you can afford to, you want to good ones. That's what we have now and if you want to get rid of either, do me a favor and punch yourself in the face. OK? Thanks.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#78

It would be stupid to get rid of Grant or Starks because a running game in the NFL nowadays is how you win games and championships. That's just a factoid for you all.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#79

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Not to mention Alex Green.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#80

It would be stupid to get rid of Grant or Starks because a running game in the NFL nowadays is how you win games and championships. That's just a factoid for you all.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Bah. You're just saying that to piss me off.

Not working. I know how you really feel about the pass vs run. 😝

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (9h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (9h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (19h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (19h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (21h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (23h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (23h) : Thank you

wpr (23h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (23h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (23h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (23h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (23h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE

packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22