2011 Starks v Grant: week 1· Page 8

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

Do you think Green will start to get some of Grant's carries by the end of the year?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

nope. he will get his own.

GB had a 100 + yards rushing in their first game. Rodgers did not have to factor into the total in a significant way. It is all good.

El3ment12
Registered

13 years ago

#72

Something I noticed about Starks is that he makes it look so easy to get like 8+ yards a carry.

peteralan71
Registered

13 years ago

#73

Something I noticed about Starks is that he makes it look so easy to get like 8+ yards a carry.

Originally Posted by: El3ment380

He always gets an extra 2 yards by falling forward. He consistently keeps his center of mass moving forward and plays lower than Grant. We're in a great position for the future.

Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#74

Something I noticed about Starks is that he makes it look so easy to get like 8+ yards a carry.

Originally Posted by: El3ment380

I noticed that too. Imo, it's because he's awesome!

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

earthquake
Member

13 years ago

#75

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

blank

wpr
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#76

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

I LIKE IT!!! =d>

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#77

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Exactly what I was saying earlier.

Getting rid of one of them IS STUPID. I said this before the season started. Starks breaks tackles. Grant avoids them. BOTH STYLES ARE GOOD.

Throughout the year, both RBs will have good games and both will falter, depending on the matchups. Here's to hoping both play 19 games.

I don't like the idea of relying on one RB in today's NFL. It's stupid. If you can afford to, you want to good ones. That's what we have now and if you want to get rid of either, do me a favor and punch yourself in the face. OK? Thanks.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#78

It would be stupid to get rid of Grant or Starks because a running game in the NFL nowadays is how you win games and championships. That's just a factoid for you all.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#79

32 157 4.9
32 147 4.6

Well, its nice to have two NFL caliber running backs, that much is for sure.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Not to mention Alex Green.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#80

It would be stupid to get rid of Grant or Starks because a running game in the NFL nowadays is how you win games and championships. That's just a factoid for you all.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Bah. You're just saying that to piss me off.

Not working. I know how you really feel about the pass vs run. 😝

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (3m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (5m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (5m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (14m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (20m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (22m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (23m) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (25m) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (34m) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (40m) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (43m) : Packers will get in

beast (44m) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (50m) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (50m) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (2h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (3h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (3h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (3h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (13h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (17h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other

beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)

Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.

beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs

packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.

beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating

Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!

wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.

beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!

beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed

Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)

Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"

Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.

Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”

packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB

Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him

beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS