Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I was poking around my Comcast bill and found that I have a limit on my bandwidth. It's set at 250GB a month, for both upload and download combined. What a bummer. We're on day 8 of the month and I've used 60GB.

Comcast @ $59.95 + $7 modem fee (Greeley, CO)
Downloads up to 6Mbps, uploads up to 1Mbps.
Monthly total, $69.97

Time Warner @ 44.95 no modem fee (Green Bay, WI)
Downloads up to 7Mbps, uploads up to 512 Kbps
Monthly total, $49.??

I suppose one would chalk this up to the higher cost of living in CO over WI.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Used a Best Buy gift card to get a modem to eliminate that damn $7 charge.

Ubee U10C018
11.7 Mbps download, 3.20 Mbps upload

Zoom 5241
11.04 Mbps download, 3.97 Mbps upload


I can't recall downloading anything more than 2Mbps so I guess the upload and lack of modem fee balances things out for me.

@$7.00/month I've given Comcast $70, which covered the cost of the new modem, easily. In other words, wish I'd have done this from the start.


The steps are very easy.
http://www.ehow.com/how_5313557_change-modem-comcast.html 
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
We dumped Comcast last week. Well technically we still have them until the 18th of the month but don't use them. Lower price was only one of the reasons. The main one was that Comcast kept dropping service. Sometimes it was 10 times in a day. Sometimes it was only for a minute other times for more than an hour. Terribly frustrating. When we called them to see what the problem was they acted like they never heard of the issue before. I know it has been a problem for a long time as my brother has their service in another town 5 miles from me he is always calling my office asking us to do a change for a client as his office internet was down.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago


Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.



The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.



How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



 



 



I have been saying this for a long time.  Why an 18 yr old needs all that is beyond me.  And yet everyone seems to get sucked up into that.  I love being at the mall and when my wife goes into a store I will stand next to one of the wireless phone kiosks.  They kids they try to explain to me the wonders of their phones.  I just laugh and say that we as a people simply don't need them.  They all argue how wonderful it is.  I just laugh at them and tell them I have my own office and I don't need it.  Why does a kid who is going to dinner and a movie need it.  They are a little stunned and some of them sheepishly agree it is more of a luxury than a necessity.



UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago

Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Not to mention that cable companies, being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality, are the poster children for putridly bad customer service.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
HTC Evo 4G on Sprint 4G (Good)

download 5.9 Mbps
upload 929 kbps
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
14 years ago

being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality

Originally Posted by: Wade 



So that's the case in the US, too, eh?

Shake. My. Head.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I have two outlets, one in the living room, one in the master room.

Living Room
Download: 14Mbps
Upload: 3.4Mbps


Master Room
Download: 2.90Mbps
Upload: 4.01Mbps



WTF??>?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.