Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I was poking around my Comcast bill and found that I have a limit on my bandwidth. It's set at 250GB a month, for both upload and download combined. What a bummer. We're on day 8 of the month and I've used 60GB.

Comcast @ $59.95 + $7 modem fee (Greeley, CO)
Downloads up to 6Mbps, uploads up to 1Mbps.
Monthly total, $69.97

Time Warner @ 44.95 no modem fee (Green Bay, WI)
Downloads up to 7Mbps, uploads up to 512 Kbps
Monthly total, $49.??

I suppose one would chalk this up to the higher cost of living in CO over WI.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Used a Best Buy gift card to get a modem to eliminate that damn $7 charge.

Ubee U10C018
11.7 Mbps download, 3.20 Mbps upload

Zoom 5241
11.04 Mbps download, 3.97 Mbps upload


I can't recall downloading anything more than 2Mbps so I guess the upload and lack of modem fee balances things out for me.

@$7.00/month I've given Comcast $70, which covered the cost of the new modem, easily. In other words, wish I'd have done this from the start.


The steps are very easy.
http://www.ehow.com/how_5313557_change-modem-comcast.html 
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
We dumped Comcast last week. Well technically we still have them until the 18th of the month but don't use them. Lower price was only one of the reasons. The main one was that Comcast kept dropping service. Sometimes it was 10 times in a day. Sometimes it was only for a minute other times for more than an hour. Terribly frustrating. When we called them to see what the problem was they acted like they never heard of the issue before. I know it has been a problem for a long time as my brother has their service in another town 5 miles from me he is always calling my office asking us to do a change for a client as his office internet was down.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago


Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.



The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.



How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



 



 



I have been saying this for a long time.  Why an 18 yr old needs all that is beyond me.  And yet everyone seems to get sucked up into that.  I love being at the mall and when my wife goes into a store I will stand next to one of the wireless phone kiosks.  They kids they try to explain to me the wonders of their phones.  I just laugh and say that we as a people simply don't need them.  They all argue how wonderful it is.  I just laugh at them and tell them I have my own office and I don't need it.  Why does a kid who is going to dinner and a movie need it.  They are a little stunned and some of them sheepishly agree it is more of a luxury than a necessity.



UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
13 years ago

Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Not to mention that cable companies, being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality, are the poster children for putridly bad customer service.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
HTC Evo 4G on Sprint 4G (Good)

download 5.9 Mbps
upload 929 kbps
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
13 years ago

being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality

Originally Posted by: Wade 



So that's the case in the US, too, eh?

Shake. My. Head.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I have two outlets, one in the living room, one in the master room.

Living Room
Download: 14Mbps
Upload: 3.4Mbps


Master Room
Download: 2.90Mbps
Upload: 4.01Mbps



WTF??>?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Elgton Jenkins Involved In Strip Club Dispute ... Cops Called To Mitigate
Zero2Cool (6h) : Derek Carr retires. Shoulder must be bad.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Pro Shop is not currently printing Golden #22 jerseys “until his number is confirmed after Training Camp.”
greengold (9-May) : My impression is he's a Peruvian soccer fan not a bares fan.
Martha Careful (9-May) : Favored Illinois Bishop?
beast (9-May) : Technically, the I in FIB stands for Italian now, Si?
dfosterf (8-May) : I never thought I'd live long enough to call a pope a FIB, but here we are
Martha Careful (8-May) : Chicago produces a pope before it produces a 4000 yard passing quarterback
wpr (8-May) : HAHAHA Mucky Comment of the day.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : According to reports, Mel Kiper is furious that Sanders wasn't selected as the new Pope
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Time taken to get picked:
Zero2Cool (8-May) : New Pope: 2 days | Shedeur Sanders: 3 days
Zero2Cool (8-May) : Collin Whitchurch @cowhitchurch · 1h Chicago got a pope before it got a QB to throw for 4,000 yards in a season.
Mucky Tundra (8-May) : New Pope from Chicago; in other words, the city produced a Pope before a 4000 yard passer
beast (7-May) : My first name starts with R and my beer belly is quite voluptuous! Thank you for noticing 😏
Zero2Cool (7-May) : beast, you're just one R from being voluptuous.
Zero2Cool (7-May) : And now some Packers blogger is like Doubs to Steelers makes sense!!!!
Zero2Cool (7-May) : You saw me Tweet???
beast (7-May) : Supposedly Steelers will be trading WR George Pickens to the Cowboys for a 3rd and late round pick swap
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Ravens release Justin Tucker, err D. Watson Jr?
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Cardinals have signed TE Josiah Deguara.
Zero2Cool (5-May) : If I were to "Google" it, then I wouldn't read it in your words.
Martha Careful (5-May) : Yes, in the military S2’s work on IPB, PERCEC, PHYSEC and IO
dfosterf (4-May) : FYI civilian companies swipe the S2 designation from the military. S2 is the intelligence branch up to brigade level. G2 is division level.
dfosterf (4-May) : Google it. Make sure to tack NFL on it or you will get the military meaning
Zero2Cool (4-May) : S2?
beast (4-May) : Seems like the S2 has a love/hate relationship with professional scouts.
beast (4-May) : In theory, the S2 test how quickly a QBs brain can solve game like issues and how quickly they can do it.
dfosterf (4-May) : Are you gentlemen and at least one lady familiar with the S2 cognition
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Maybe there isn't an issue.
beast (4-May) : NFL really needs to fix their position labeling issue, but I don't think they care
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Packers did not activate the fifth-year options for linebacker Quay Walker, with the goal of signing him to a contract extension.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Matthew Golden spoke with Randall Cobb before draft. Looked like chance encounter.
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : from a head left turn?
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : someone drunk?
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Unlikely.
dfosterf (30-Apr) : How long until Jeff Sperbeck's family sues John Elway ?
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Packers are exercising the fifth-year option on DT Devonte Wyatt, locking in a guaranteed $12.9M for the 2026 season.
beast (30-Apr) : Sounds like P Luke Elzinga has a rookie try out opportunity from the Titans
dfosterf (30-Apr) : Luke Elzinga Punter Oklahoma stil unsigned. Green Bay has been mentioned as good fit
beast (30-Apr) : The Packers re-signed three exclusive rights free agents WR Melton, P Whelan and RB Wilson.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : February 5, 2002 (age 23) ok no. packers.com is wrong
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Micah Robinson is only 19??
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : 6 first rounders on Packers defense now
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : LB Isaiah Simmons. Signed. Called it!!! Oh yeah!
Martha Careful (29-Apr) : ty bboystyle...fat fingers
bboystyle (29-Apr) : Tom*
Martha Careful (28-Apr) : RIP Packer Safety Tim Brown
beast (27-Apr) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
beast (27-Apr) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

9-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

8-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-May / Packers Draft Threads / Martha Careful

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.