Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I was poking around my Comcast bill and found that I have a limit on my bandwidth. It's set at 250GB a month, for both upload and download combined. What a bummer. We're on day 8 of the month and I've used 60GB.

Comcast @ $59.95 + $7 modem fee (Greeley, CO)
Downloads up to 6Mbps, uploads up to 1Mbps.
Monthly total, $69.97

Time Warner @ 44.95 no modem fee (Green Bay, WI)
Downloads up to 7Mbps, uploads up to 512 Kbps
Monthly total, $49.??

I suppose one would chalk this up to the higher cost of living in CO over WI.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Used a Best Buy gift card to get a modem to eliminate that damn $7 charge.

Ubee U10C018
11.7 Mbps download, 3.20 Mbps upload

Zoom 5241
11.04 Mbps download, 3.97 Mbps upload


I can't recall downloading anything more than 2Mbps so I guess the upload and lack of modem fee balances things out for me.

@$7.00/month I've given Comcast $70, which covered the cost of the new modem, easily. In other words, wish I'd have done this from the start.


The steps are very easy.
http://www.ehow.com/how_5313557_change-modem-comcast.html 
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
We dumped Comcast last week. Well technically we still have them until the 18th of the month but don't use them. Lower price was only one of the reasons. The main one was that Comcast kept dropping service. Sometimes it was 10 times in a day. Sometimes it was only for a minute other times for more than an hour. Terribly frustrating. When we called them to see what the problem was they acted like they never heard of the issue before. I know it has been a problem for a long time as my brother has their service in another town 5 miles from me he is always calling my office asking us to do a change for a client as his office internet was down.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago


Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.



The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.



How many people actually need or truly benefit from having internet at their fingertips wherever they go? I would venture to guess less than 1% of users. It is just one more way to keep people submerged in a cyberuniverse instead of interacting with real people around them.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



 



 



I have been saying this for a long time.  Why an 18 yr old needs all that is beyond me.  And yet everyone seems to get sucked up into that.  I love being at the mall and when my wife goes into a store I will stand next to one of the wireless phone kiosks.  They kids they try to explain to me the wonders of their phones.  I just laugh and say that we as a people simply don't need them.  They all argue how wonderful it is.  I just laugh at them and tell them I have my own office and I don't need it.  Why does a kid who is going to dinner and a movie need it.  They are a little stunned and some of them sheepishly agree it is more of a luxury than a necessity.



UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
13 years ago

Monthly bandwidth caps are becoming virtually ubiquitous. For many carriers the cap is at 250 GB and there is talk of many companies slashing that to 100 GB.

The explosion in smartphone and other mobile device use is stressing the internet backbone and fucking over more traditional internet users. I have no intention of ever getting a smartphone, and even if those were the only kind available, I never intend to use my phone to browse the internet.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Is that really the primary problem, though? I mean, I can understand smartphones increasing traffic... but I find it pretty difficult to believe that smartphones have increased traffic to the point of requiring bandwidth caps, which every company now claims is a necessity.

Frankly, I think the bigger problem is that all internet companies are affiliated with cable-television. Therein lies the problem... television is being phased out and the preferred medium of choice is becoming online on-demand services (like Netflix, youtube, etc.).

That is a big blow to companies who have invested millions in television infrastructure, rights fees, etc. As a way to continue to make enough previous levels of profit from their investments, companies like Time Warner, Comcast, Rogers and Bell (both in Canada) start setting unfair restrictions with the hope that people cut down on their on-demand online viewing, and return to watching television.

Frankly, the claims by companies with a stake in having people buy and use cable t.v. are starting to get pathetic. It is sad that companies, in response to development and progression, are resorting to restrictions on the fruits of the progression just to protect their behinds. I personally prefer to go through independently owned companies that buy bandwidth from the major players via wholesale, and then retail that at a cheaper rate with much looser bandwidth caps.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Not to mention that cable companies, being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality, are the poster children for putridly bad customer service.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
HTC Evo 4G on Sprint 4G (Good)

download 5.9 Mbps
upload 929 kbps
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
13 years ago

being government-protected monopolies in virtually every municipality

Originally Posted by: Wade 



So that's the case in the US, too, eh?

Shake. My. Head.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
I have two outlets, one in the living room, one in the master room.

Living Room
Download: 14Mbps
Upload: 3.4Mbps


Master Room
Download: 2.90Mbps
Upload: 4.01Mbps



WTF??>?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (1h) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan
beast (1h) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan
Mucky Tundra (3h) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?
beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*
beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
beast (29-Dec) : Taylor still at it!
beast (29-Dec) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over
packerfanoutwest (29-Dec) : Jets pull Aaron Rodgers for Tyrod Taylor
Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Colts-Giants now a tight one
beast (29-Dec) : Still early, but Giants 14 to 3 over Colts
beast (29-Dec) : With Broncos losing to the Bengals, Colts got to control their destiny for the 7th seed... looks like they're about to give it up
Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : I believe Pickett is starting for Philly
beast (29-Dec) : Is the Eagles QB Hurts playing? I forgot to check
Zero2Cool (29-Dec) : Watson unlikely to play today.
Mucky Tundra (29-Dec) : Good job gpg!
go.pack.go. (29-Dec) : I figured out the signature thing. I had to find a different hosting website
Zero2Cool (28-Dec) : Packers elevated S Omar Brown.
go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : I tried the [img][/img] but that didn’t work
go.pack.go. (28-Dec) : How do I upload a picture to change my signature? I haven’t done it in years lol. I have the picture but can’t get it to work
Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Saturday NFL games=the season is about to get serious
Mucky Tundra (28-Dec) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.
buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,
buckeyepackfan (27-Dec) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games
Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (27-Dec) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

30-Dec / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

27-Dec / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

27-Dec / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.