Cheesey
14 years ago
VERY funny Zero, VERY funny!!!LOL!
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

VERY funny Zero, VERY funny!!!LOL!

"Cheesey" wrote:

😉
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago
I have trouble also understanding the argument ... example - my figured might be off but here is the gist.

The british gas company made record profits last year 40% more meanwhile they kept charging bigger and bigger fees because the cost of fuel (as they say) ...

- just found a article; not sure if this is what I read awhile ago but
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/business/s/1409225_british_gas_unveils_record_profit 

obviously my details were a bit off ...

- same like the financial sector ... they keep making huge profits; although not much has been done to curb what occured.

I do agree on more should be done to turn things green and less reliant on mid east oil.

I mean do we really want to be in the mideast? ...
Porforis
14 years ago

I have trouble also understanding the argument ... example - my figured might be off but here is the gist.

The british gas company made record profits last year 40% more meanwhile they kept charging bigger and bigger fees because the cost of fuel (as they say) ...

- just found a article; not sure if this is what I read awhile ago but
http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/business/s/1409225_british_gas_unveils_record_profit 

obviously my details were a bit off ...

- same like the financial sector ... they keep making huge profits; although not much has been done to curb what occured.

I do agree on more should be done to turn things green and less reliant on mid east oil.

I mean do we really want to be in the mideast? ...

"Dulak" wrote:



Just to be clear from the get-go I'm talking exclusively about the 'states as the geography, attitudes towards cars, and attitudes towards electricity are a lot different.

If you're talking about going green in terms of cars, the only real "green" cars out there are electric cars. Although you then have to ask where your electricity is coming from. How green do you want to be? Is coal good enough? Do we need to have more wind and solar power on the grid? Does increased reliance on non-24/7 forms of energy production create other problems, such as the potential for brownouts or blackouts?

How about nuclear power? After the recent disaster in Japan, do we still want to be building more nuclear power plants? Sure, we can keep them away from fault lines (I'm looking at you, CA), but earthquakes aren't the only potential disasters. Personally, I'm still all for nuclear power after a very close look at where plants are placed, but not all people are.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Okay, I'll be the cranky economist.

1. There are people willing to pay more for gas. Why the heck if I'm an oil company would I not charge all the market could bear?

2. If I'm an oil company shareholder, I want more profits rather than less. Why the heck shouldn't I reward very, very generously the management who finds a way to profit from higher and higher prices?

3. If you think oil should be cheaper, find a way to get it cheaper and stop buying as much from the people who charge so much.

4. If you think oil company execs get paid too much, buy less oil --if you buy less oil, oil company profits will go down. And oil company shareholders, being unhappy at same, will give less salaries to their executives.

There's not one of us who couldn't, if we wanted to, cut back on the amount of petroleum products we use. We could drive a little bit less, car pool a little more, use a bit less paint, check our tires more frequently, run our cars another 100 miles without an oil change, etc etc etc. And if we cut back a little bit, all of us, the oil companies would feel it. 300 million people each buying one less gallon of gas is over a billion dollars.

Of course, we don't. Instead we've found new ways to use more gas. Drive down the street. Count the SUVs. Count the number of two- and three- and four-car families. Count the number of cars with one person in them. Count the number of air conditioners. Count the number of bathrooms in houses. Etc. Etc. etc.

The price of gas gets higher because we keep increasing our demand for it.

So quit complaining about the damn oil companies and their rich execs. They're just scumbag drug dealers.

We're the damn addicts that enable them.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Wow Wade, you're right! I'll get a kiddie train on my bike and we'll ride 20 miles one way everywhere we need to go. And when I'm getting groceries I'll get a basket and make several trips!

WOW FUCKING GENIUS!
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Okay, I'll be the cranky economist.

1. There are people willing to pay more for gas. Why the heck if I'm an oil company would I not charge all the market could bear?

2. If I'm an oil company shareholder, I want more profits rather than less. Why the heck shouldn't I reward very, very generously the management who finds a way to profit from higher and higher prices?

3. If you think oil should be cheaper, find a way to get it cheaper and stop buying as much from the people who charge so much.

4. If you think oil company execs get paid too much, buy less oil --if you buy less oil, oil company profits will go down. And oil company shareholders, being unhappy at same, will give less salaries to their executives.

There's not one of us who couldn't, if we wanted to, cut back on the amount of petroleum products we use. We could drive a little bit less, car pool a little more, use a bit less paint, check our tires more frequently, run our cars another 100 miles without an oil change, etc etc etc. And if we cut back a little bit, all of us, the oil companies would feel it. 300 million people each buying one less gallon of gas is over a billion dollars.

Of course, we don't. Instead we've found new ways to use more gas. Drive down the street. Count the SUVs. Count the number of two- and three- and four-car families. Count the number of cars with one person in them. Count the number of air conditioners. Count the number of bathrooms in houses. Etc. Etc. etc.

The price of gas gets higher because we keep increasing our demand for it.

So quit complaining about the damn oil companies and their rich execs. They're just scumbag drug dealers.

We're the damn addicts that enable them.

"Wade" wrote:



Wade gets it so he gets a :icon_smile:

Americans consume too much gas. Like a bunch of drug addicts. I still see 40-50% of vehicles on the road are trucks/vans/SUVs, even though I highly doubt the majority of people who drive them are blue collar workers, you know, the kind of people who NEED those vehicles.

As long as people keep overconsuming gas, gasoline will be expensive. Yes, Wade IS an economics professor but apparently I'm one of the few people who stayed awake in high school economics. There's a simple rule called "supply and demand."

And yes, Zero, I carpool and walk everywhere, including getting groceries. I have no problem carrying a few gallons of milk + groceries from the store to our apartment, as long as it's not raining. It is possible to consume less gasoline if people are willing to do it. But then again, I also take consuming less resources + saving for my retirement (by cutting costs) seriously.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Gasoline consumption is only one part of the equation. Most people never stop to think that virtually all plastics (yes, that includes the polyester in your suit, Wade), pharmaceuticals, pesticides, insecticides, fertilizers, and innumerable other classes of everyday substances are also derived from petrochemicals. For example, the volume of oil consumed to produce a plastic bottle is approximately one-third the final volume of that bottle. So every time you drink a 20 oz. Coke, you just consumed about 7 oz. of crude oil.

In other words, even if everyone gave up their autos, we would still be using a a lot of oil. Eventually, we are going to have to find a way to move beyond our oil-based economy. There are solutions out there, but they are not cheap. The plastic water cups available at UW-L's cafeteria look and feel exactly like ordinary translucent plastic cups, but they are made from corn starch instead of petrochemicals. Of course, they cost 12 cents a cup instead of less than 2 cents a cup. But they are biodegradable and recyclable.

One thing I like about Oldenburg is that the busses here run on compressed natural gas (CNG), which, along with liquid propane gas (LPG), is available at some of the gas stations here. Whereas gasoline costs at least 1,55 per liter, CNG only costs about 0,79 per liter and I think LPG is about 0,49 per liter. A bus driver told me a bus typically burns about 200 kg of CNG a day. I am not sure how many liters that is.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I agree it is definitely possible to consume LESS fuel, no question. Hell, I just sold my Explorer and bought a Forte that doubled my mileage per gallon. However, walking 4.6 miles one way to get a loaf of bread or gallon of milk with a 9 year old feels a bit unreasonable.

4.6 x 2 is 9.2 (see I paid some attention in math class!) and figure 30 MPG, gas per gallon $3.59. Roughly guessing 1/3 of a gallon of gas will be used that'd be about $1.20 I'd save by biking or walking. Then consider the time to bike or walk and factor that into already being light on free time ....

I'd like to bike to work, but 12.7 miles one way might take too long. I'd have to figure out if I want to give up working out at 5am, or get up at 3:30am to work out, then bike to work.

I suppose you'll respond back saying I didn't pay attention in communications class because I'm not knocking on neighbors doors asking if they need groceries and if so, let's car pool--- right? Wait, everyone in my neighborhood speaks Spanish, so there I go failing once again because I didn't take Spanish in high school. lol


Again, I agree, we all could and in my opinion should be less dependent on fuel consumption. Sometimes the issues that arise are --- at what cost? I do appreciate zombieslayer attempt to answer the original question which was me failing to understand the NEED for gas prices to be so high,, its done because ... they can because WE let them, which I think is exactly what he's saying. Which I already knew as it's pretty damn obvious. I think there is no NEED for it, but as mentioned before, we are not doing anything to deter them from continuing to increase the prices. We still buy the big ass Hummer's and whatever else. Each Hummer sold, oil exec's get $$ in their eyes.

I could be wrong though because I didn't pay attention during high school language. 😛
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
No, you have it correct, Kevin.

That was actually my point (zombieslayer just said it more clearly). High prices for gas (and other petroleum based products), and the high oil company profits and high oil company executive compensation, all derive from the amount of our demand for those petroleum-based problems.

If people want those prices, profits, and compensation to go down, there's only one way to do it: find a way to reduce that demand.

Me, I'm not going to be more sustainable (sorry, zombieslayer) until the price goes up farther yet. Because the costs of carpooling, solar energy, whatever, is still even higher to me. Because, right now, oil, and even more so, coal, is still cheaper than the alternatives for my own "energy/paint/etc" needs. But that's a different question.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
dfosterf (9h) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (11h) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (12h) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.